Lucene search
+L

10093 matches found

Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2023/08/15 6:25 p.m.•18 views

CVE-2023-4338 Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable due to insecure default of HTTP configuration that does not provide X-Content-Type-Options Headers

Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable due to insecure default of HTTP configuration that does not provide X-Content-Type-Options Headers...

7.1AI score0.00703EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2023/08/15 6:25 p.m.•41 views

CVE-2023-4338 Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable due to insecure default of HTTP configuration that does not provide X-Content-Type-Options Headers

Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable due to insecure default of HTTP configuration that does not provide X-Content-Type-Options Headers...

9.6AI score0.00703EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
CNNVD
CNNVD
•added 2023/08/15 12:00 a.m.•18 views

Broadcom RAID Controller Security Vulnerability

The Broadcom RAID Controller is a series of RAID controllers from Broadcom Corporation USA. A security vulnerability exists in the Broadcom RAID Controller that stems from the lack of an HTTP X-Content-Type-Options header in the web interface, which makes the product susceptible to attack...

9.8CVSS6.7AI score0.00703EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2023/08/15 12:00 a.m.•17 views

PT-2023-28815 · Broadcom · Broadcom Raid Controller

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Broadcom RAID Controller affected versions not specified Description: The Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable due to an insecure default HTTP configuration that does not provide X-Content-Type-Options Headers. This issue...

9.8CVSS9.3AI score0.00703EPSS
SaveExploits0References6
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2023/08/15 12:00 a.m.•4 views

CVE-2023-4338: Undefined Security Weakness

Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable due to insecure default of HTTP configuration that does not provide X-Content-Type-Options Headers...

9.8CVSS8.2AI score0.00703EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
OSV
OSV
•added 2023/08/14 10:15 p.m.•17 views

CVE-2023-21234

In launchConfirmationActivity of ChooseLockSettingsHelper.java, there is a possible way to enable developer options without the lockscreen PIN due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is no...

5.5CVSS5.9AI score0.00079EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
NVD
NVD
•added 2023/08/14 10:15 p.m.•37 views

CVE-2023-21234

In launchConfirmationActivity of ChooseLockSettingsHelper.java, there is a possible way to enable developer options without the lockscreen PIN due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is no...

5.5CVSS5.8AI score0.00079EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2023/08/14 9:10 p.m.•37 views

CVE-2023-21234

In launchConfirmationActivity of ChooseLockSettingsHelper.java, there is a possible way to enable developer options without the lockscreen PIN due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is no...

6.5AI score0.00079EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
CNNVD
CNNVD
•added 2023/08/14 12:00 a.m.•15 views

Google Wear OS Security Vulnerability

Google Wear OS is a Google-developed operating system from Google, Inc. designed for use in smartwatches, smart bands, and other wearable devices. Google Wear OS suffers from a security vulnerability that stems from a lack of permission checking in the launchConfirmationActivity module of...

5.5CVSS6.5AI score0.00079EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2023/08/14 12:00 a.m.•4 views

CVE-2023-21234: Missing Authorization

In launchConfirmationActivity of ChooseLockSettingsHelper.java, there is a possible way to enable developer options without the lockscreen PIN due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is no...

5.5CVSS6.1AI score0.00079EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2023/08/14 12:00 a.m.•22 views

PT-2023-18020 · Google · Android

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Android affected versions not specified Description: The issue is related to a missing permission check in the launchConfirmationActivity of ChooseLockSettingsHelper.java. This could allow enabling developer options without the lockscreen PIN...

5.5CVSS5.5AI score0.00079EPSS
SaveExploits0References8
SUSE CVE
SUSE CVE
•added 2023/08/12 2:10 a.m.•6 views

SUSE CVE-2023-40267

GitPython before 3.1.32 does not block insecure non-multi options in clone and clonefrom. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2022-24439...

6.7CVSS6.9AI score0.01182EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2023/08/11 8:52 a.m.•31 views

CVE-2023-38325

The cryptography package before 41.0.2 for Python mishandles SSH certificates that have critical options...

7.5CVSS7.1AI score0.00732EPSS
SaveExploits1References4
NVD
NVD
•added 2023/08/11 7:15 a.m.•31 views

CVE-2023-40267

GitPython before 3.1.32 does not block insecure non-multi options in clone and clonefrom. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2022-24439...

9.8CVSS9AI score0.01182EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
OSV
OSV
•added 2023/08/11 7:15 a.m.•6 views

DEBIAN-CVE-2023-40267

GitPython before 3.1.32 does not block insecure non-multi options in clone and clonefrom. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2022-24439...

9.8CVSS8.3AI score0.01182EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Prion
Prion
•added 2023/08/11 7:15 a.m.•41 views

Code injection

GitPython before 3.1.32 does not block insecure non-multi options in clone and clonefrom. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2022-24439...

7.5CVSS9.4AI score0.05652EPSS
SaveExploits2References4Affected Software1
OSV
OSV
•added 2023/08/11 7:15 a.m.•15 views

PYSEC-2023-137

GitPython before 3.1.32 does not block insecure non-multi options in clone and clonefrom. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2022-24439...

9.8CVSS5.8AI score0.01182EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
GitLab Advisory Database
GitLab Advisory Database
•added 2023/08/11 12:00 a.m.•48 views

Improper Input Validation

GitPython before 3.1.32 does not block insecure non-multi options in clone and clonefrom. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2022-24439...

9.8CVSS6.9AI score0.05652EPSS
SaveExploits2References3Affected Software1
Mend
Mend
•added 2023/08/11 12:00 a.m.•4 views

CVE-2023-40267

GitPython before 3.1.32 does not block insecure non-multi options in clone and clonefrom. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2022-24439...

9.8CVSS0.01182EPSS
SaveExploits0References12
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2023/08/11 12:00 a.m.•72 views

CVE-2023-40267

GitPython before 3.1.32 does not block insecure non-multi options in clone and clonefrom. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2022-24439...

9.8AI score0.01182EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Rows per page
Query Builder