Lucene search
+L

658 matches found

vulnersOsv
vulnersOsv
•added 2022/08/18 6:48 p.m.•6 views

4337-snap (>=0.1.0, <=0.1.1), @0xabcdefg/smart-order-router (>=1.0.0, <=1.0.5) +1183 more potentially affected by CVE-2022-31198 via @openzeppelin/contracts (>=4.3.0, <=4.7.1)

@openzeppelin/contracts NPM version =4.3.0, =0.1.0, =1.0.0, =1.0.0, =3.24.7, =1.7.2, =1.0.0, =0.2.0, =1.0.2, =4.0.0-prerelease, =4.0.1-alpha, =2.0.0-beta.1, =2.0.3, =2.1.0 and more Source cves: CVE-2022-31198 Source advisory: OSV:GHSA-XRC4-737V-9Q75...

7.5CVSS7.2AI score0.00765EPSS
SaveExploits0
Github Security Blog
Github Security Blog
•added 2022/08/18 6:48 p.m.•46 views

OpenZeppelin Contracts's GovernorVotesQuorumFraction updates to quorum may affect past defeated proposals

Impact This issue concerns instances of Governor that use the module GovernorVotesQuorumFraction, a mechanism that determines quorum requirements as a percentage of the voting token's total supply. In affected instances, when a proposal is passed to lower the quorum requirement, past proposals ma...

7.5CVSS7.3AI score0.00765EPSS
SaveExploits0References5Affected Software2
OSV
OSV
•added 2022/08/18 6:48 p.m.•59 views

GHSA-XRC4-737V-9Q75 OpenZeppelin Contracts's GovernorVotesQuorumFraction updates to quorum may affect past defeated proposals

Impact This issue concerns instances of Governor that use the module GovernorVotesQuorumFraction, a mechanism that determines quorum requirements as a percentage of the voting token's total supply. In affected instances, when a proposal is passed to lower the quorum requirement, past proposals ma...

7.5CVSS7.4AI score0.00765EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/08/17 12:00 a.m.•28 views

Not calling approve(0) before setting a new approval might cause reverts when used with Tether (USDT)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some tokens do not implement the ERC20 standard properly but are still accepted by most code that accepts ERC20 tokens. For example Tether USDT's approve function will revert if the current approval is not zero, to protect against front-running changes o...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Veracode
Veracode
•added 2022/08/16 5:11 p.m.•31 views

Authorization Bypass

OpenZeppelin contracts are vulnerable to authorization bypass. The vulnerability is due to functions ECDSA.recover and ECDSA.tryRecover accepting EIP-2098 and 65-byte signatures. Affected contracts have signature reuse or replay protection, implemented by marking the signature as used rather than...

7.9CVSS6.3AI score0.00428EPSS
SaveExploits0References3Affected Software2
NVD
NVD
•added 2022/08/15 11:21 a.m.•55 views

CVE-2022-35961

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The functions ECDSA.recover and ECDSA.tryRecover are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issu...

7.9CVSS0.00428EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Prion
Prion
•added 2022/08/15 11:21 a.m.•47 views

Format string

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The functions ECDSA.recover and ECDSA.tryRecover are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issu...

4CVSS6.5AI score0.00428EPSS
SaveExploits0References3Affected Software2
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/08/15 12:00 a.m.•19 views

FETH.sol is susceptible to ERC20 approve functionality front-running exploit

Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of concept The problem is perfectly described here The tldr; is that if you approved a person to spend 100 tokens and then you want to decrease his allowance to 50, if he spends his 100 tokens allowance before you set his allowance to 50 he will be able t...

6.6AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/08/15 12:00 a.m.•19 views

_safeMint() should be used rather than _mint() wherever possible

Lines of code Vulnerability details safeMint should be used rather than mint wherever possible Impact In NFTCollections.sol and NFTDropCollection, eventually it is called ERC721 mint. Calling mint this way does not ensure that the receiver of the NFT is able to accept them, making possible to los...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/08/15 12:00 a.m.•14 views

[H1] Protocol is unusable with some ERC20 tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact ​ Protocol unusable for USDT and other bad tokens Proof of Concept ​ Some ERC20 tokens do not implement correctly EIP-20 standard. They just do not return a boolean in transfer/transferFrom functions and just return void. Asking them for a boolean will...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/08/15 12:00 a.m.•18 views

Unsafe use of transfer()/transferFrom() with IERC20

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some tokens do not implement the ERC20 standard properly but are still accepted by most code that accepts ERC20 tokens. For example Tether USDT's transfer and transferFrom functions do not return booleans as the specification requires, and instead have n...

7.1AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/08/15 12:00 a.m.•15 views

Using StableMath and SafeCast

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. import "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeCast.sol"; Wrappers over Solidity’s uintXX/intXX casting operators with added overflow checks. Downcasting from uint256/int256 in Solidity does not revert ...

7.2AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2022/08/15 12:00 a.m.•14 views

createLock: User can lose funds by sending a wrong _value parameter

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Users can lose funds by sending a wrong value parameter. The problems relays in casting value to int128. Solidity does not check casting, just math operations. If a user tries to lock an amount greater than 2^128, the transaction won't be reverted and...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
CNNVD
CNNVD
•added 2022/08/15 12:00 a.m.•36 views

OpenZeppelin 安全漏洞

OpenZeppelin is a software application. A standard for secure blockchain applications. A security vulnerability exists in OpenZeppelin Contracts 4.1.0 and earlier versions, which stems from the function ECDSA.recover and vulnerability to a type of signature extensibility...

7.9CVSS6.9AI score0.00428EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
OSV
OSV
•added 2022/08/14 12:25 a.m.•38 views

GHSA-9J3M-G383-29QR OpenZeppelin Contracts's Cross chain utilities for Arbitrum L2 see EOA calls as cross chain calls

Impact Contracts using the cross chain utilies for Arbitrum L2, CrossChainEnabledArbitrumL2 or LibArbitrumL2, will classify direct interactions of externally owned accounts EOAs as cross chain calls, even though they are not started on L1. This is assessed as low severity because any action taken...

5.3CVSS5.1AI score0.00581EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
vulnersOsv
vulnersOsv
•added 2022/08/14 12:25 a.m.•5 views

@aragon/core-contracts (>=0.3.0-alpha, <=3.0.0-alpha), @benddao/bend-downpayment (1.0.0) +21 more potentially affected by CVE-2022-35916 via @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable (>=4.6.0, <=4.7.0)

@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable NPM version =4.6.0, =0.3.0-alpha, =1.2.0, =0.0.2, =0.1.0-rc-1, =0.1.6, =0.1.0, =0.2.0 and more Source cves: CVE-2022-35916 Source advisory: OSV:GHSA-9J3M-G383-29QR...

5.3CVSS5.7AI score0.00581EPSS
SaveExploits0
vulnersOsv
vulnersOsv
•added 2022/08/14 12:25 a.m.•4 views

@0xabcdefg/smart-order-router (>=1.0.0, <=1.0.5), @0xabcdefg/universal-router-sdk (>=1.0.0, <=1.0.2) +838 more potentially affected by CVE-2022-35916 via @openzeppelin/contracts (>=4.6.0, <=4.7.1)

@openzeppelin/contracts NPM version =4.6.0, =1.0.0, =1.0.0, =3.24.7, =1.7.2, =1.0.0, =0.2.0, =2.0.17, =0.0.1, =0.0.1, =0.0.1, =3.53.0, =3.59.0 and more Source cves: CVE-2022-35916 Source advisory: OSV:GHSA-9J3M-G383-29QR...

5.3CVSS6AI score0.00581EPSS
SaveExploits0
Github Security Blog
Github Security Blog
•added 2022/08/14 12:25 a.m.•42 views

OpenZeppelin Contracts's Cross chain utilities for Arbitrum L2 see EOA calls as cross chain calls

Impact Contracts using the cross chain utilies for Arbitrum L2, CrossChainEnabledArbitrumL2 or LibArbitrumL2, will classify direct interactions of externally owned accounts EOAs as cross chain calls, even though they are not started on L1. This is assessed as low severity because any action taken...

5.3CVSS5.4AI score0.00581EPSS
SaveExploits0References5Affected Software2
vulnersOsv
vulnersOsv
•added 2022/08/14 12:23 a.m.•6 views

@0xwen/core (>=0.0.1, <=0.0.3), @0xwen/core-v5 (>=0.0.1, <=0.0.3) +215 more potentially affected by CVE-2022-35915 via @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable (>=3.4.0, <=4.7.0)

@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable NPM version =3.4.0, =0.0.1, =0.0.1, =0.0.2, =0.0.1, =0.2.1-alpha, =0.9.1, =0.19.0-beta.0, =2.0.0-alpha.1, =3.0.0-alpha0, =2.0.0-alpha.0, =3.0.1-alpha, =0.1.0-alpha, =0.24.2, =1.0.0-beta.1, =0.6.0-beta.0, =0.26.0 and more Source cves: CVE-2022-35915 Source...

5.3CVSS5.6AI score0.00776EPSS
SaveExploits0
vulnersOsv
vulnersOsv
•added 2022/08/14 12:23 a.m.•8 views

0x-hunter-core (>=1.0.0-33, <=1.0.0-38), 1155-to-20 (>=1.0.0, <=1.0.2) +3110 more potentially affected by CVE-2022-35915 via @openzeppelin/contracts (>=2.3.0, <=4.7.1)

@openzeppelin/contracts NPM version =2.3.0, =1.0.0-33, =1.0.0, =0.1.0, =1.0.0, =1.0.0, =1.9.1, =3.24.7, =1.7.2, =3.10.3, =0.0.2, =1.4.1, =1.0.0, =1.0.0-alpha.0, =1.1.0-alpha.0 and more Source cves: CVE-2022-35915 Source advisory: OSV:GHSA-7GRF-83VW-6F5X...

5.3CVSS6AI score0.00776EPSS
SaveExploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder