CVE-2025-14873

The CVE-2025-14873 CSRF vulnerability exists in LatePoint for WordPress (up to version 5.2.5). It arises because call_by_route_name does not enforce nonce verification, allowing unauthenticated attackers to induce site administrators to perform actions via forged requests. Remediation: update to ...

CVE-2025-14873

The LatePoint – Calendar Booking Plugin for Appointments and Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.2.5. This is due to the 'callbyroutename' function in the routing layer only validating user capabilities without enforcing...

CVE-2025-14873 LatePoint – Calendar Booking Plugin for Appointments and Events <= 5.2.5 - Cross-Site Request Forgery

The LatePoint – Calendar Booking Plugin for Appointments and Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.2.5. This is due to the 'callbyroutename' function in the routing layer only validating user capabilities without enforcing...

CVE-2026-1983

The SEATT: Simple Event Attendance plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the event deletion functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary...

CVE-2026-1983

CVE-2026-1983 concerns the SEATT: Simple Event Attendance plugin for WordPress. The Wordfence entry states this vuln is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) flaw present in all versions up to 1.5.0, caused by missing nonce validation on event deletion. This enables unauthenticated attackers to tri...

CVE-2026-1983 SEATT: Simple Event Attendance <= 1.5.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary Event Deletion

The SEATT: Simple Event Attendance plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the event deletion functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary...

CVE-2026-1983: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The SEATT: Simple Event Attendance plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the event deletion functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary...

PT-2026-8074

The WP Quick Contact Us plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings vi...

CVE-2025-14852: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The MDirector Newsletter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.8. This is due to missing nonce verification on the mdirectorNewsletterSave function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's...

PT-2026-8058

The MDirector Newsletter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.8. This is due to missing nonce verification on the mdirectorNewsletterSave function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's...

PT-2026-8059

The LatePoint – Calendar Booking Plugin for Appointments and Events plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.2.5. This is due to the 'call by route name' function in the routing layer only validating user capabilities without enforci...

PT-2026-8073

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions midi-Synth plugin for WordPress versions up to and including 1.1.0 Description The midi-Synth plugin for WordPress is susceptible to arbitrary file uploads because of a lack of file type and file extension validation within the 'export' AJAX...

CVE-2026-1394: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

The WP Quick Contact Us plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings vi...

CVE-2025-15520

The RegistrationMagic WordPress plugin before 6.0.7.2 checks nonces but not capabilities, allowing for the disclosure of some sensitive data to subscribers and above...

CVE-2025-15520 RegistrationMagic <= 6.0.7.2 - Subscriber+ Sensitive Data Disclosure

The RegistrationMagic WordPress plugin before 6.0.7.2 checks nonces but not capabilities, allowing for the disclosure of some sensitive data to subscribers and above...

CVE-2025-15520 RegistrationMagic <= 6.0.7.2 - Subscriber+ Sensitive Data Disclosure

The RegistrationMagic WordPress plugin before 6.0.7.2 checks nonces but not capabilities, allowing for the disclosure of some sensitive data to subscribers and above...

CVE-2025-15520

The RegistrationMagic WordPress plugin before 6.0.7.2 checks nonces but not capabilities, allowing for the disclosure of some sensitive data to subscribers and above...

Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2026-26014

The Linux/Unix host has one or more packages installed that are impacted by a vulnerability without a vendor supplied patch available. - Pion DTLS is a Go implementation of Datagram Transport Layer Security. Pion DTLS versions v1.0.0 through v3.0.10 and 3.1.0 use random nonce generation with AES...

CVE-2026-1215

The MMA Call Tracking plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.3.15. This is due to missing nonce validation when saving plugin configuration on the mmacalltrackingmenu admin page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers...

CVE-2026-26014

A vulnerability has been identified in the Pion DTLS implementation where the use of random nonce generation with AES-GCM ciphers does not adhere to recommended cryptographic practices. Under certain conditions, this may allow remote attackers to more easily derive or reuse encryption...