20422 matches found
Check if the token of projectId matches the projectToken of the JBXBuybackDelegate
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact At line 202, the amountReceived returned by the swap function is based on the projectToken defined in JBXBuybackDelegate. This will incorrectly trigger the mint function and because there is no verification of projectToken, it will mistakenly mint...
If, as a result of the calculation, _tokenCount = 0, then this may lead to incorrect execution of the _mint function(_data, _tokenCount).
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If the payParams function receives null values in data, then uint256 tokenCount = PRBMath.mulDivdata.amount.value, data.weight, 10 18 may result in a null value. Proof of Concept If, as a result of the calculation, tokenCount = 0, then this may lead to...
Malicious user can Mint infinite amount of project tokens as anyone can call payParams function through malicious input and set the _tokenCount .
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Malicious user can Mint infinite amount of project tokens as anyone can call payParams function through malicious input and set the tokenCount. The payparams function calculates the tokenCount variable which refers to the amount of token to be minted or...
JBXBuybackDelegate.didPay() allows for positive slippage theft
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The JBXBuybackDelegate.didPay calls swap which utilizes the Uniswap's swap function. JBXBuybackDelegate incorporates a negative slippage check in uniswapV3SwapCallback. However, it fails to consider the deadline parameter of the transaction. The deadline...
Anyone can front-rundidPay calling payParams to grief swaps and mints
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The payParams function in the IJBPayDelegate contract does not currently have any form of access control implemented. This could allow a malicious user to manipulate the mintedAmount and reservedRate state variable, which can interfere with the correct...
contract might not function due to lack of funds
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact when the contract receives a Uniswap pool callback the contract performs some checks before it proceeds to call the weth.deposit with a msg.value that is equal to amountToSend to wrap eth and transfer it to the pool, however the contract is not guarantee...
WETH transfer may fail silently in 'uniswapV3SwapCallback' function and execution may stop without any reverts or notification.
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact WETH transfer may fail silently in 'uniswapV3SwapCallback' function and execution may stop without any reverts or notification. Proof of Concept In the 'uniswapV3SwapCallback' function There's no checks if the WETH transfer have failed or not . If the...
Return values of weth.transfer() not checked
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Return values of weth.transfer not checked Proof of Concept The function weth.transfer has a boolean return value function transferaddress dst, uint wad public returns bool return transferFrommsg.sender, dst, wad; and they indicate errors that way instea...
Invalid conversion uint256 -> int256
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Invalid conversion uint256 - int256 in pool.swap.... The number may be incorrectly converted uint256 data.amount.value - int256 amountSpecified. As a result, number truncation may occur. Proof of Concept typeuint256.max =...
CVE-2023-20882: Gorouter pruning via client disconnect resulting in DOS | Cloud Foundry
Severity High Vendor Cloud Foundry Foundation Description A bug in the gorouter process for the versions from 0.262.0 and prior to 0.266.0 of routing-release can lead to a denial of service of applications hosted on Cloud Foundry. Under the right circumstances, when client connections are closed...
Unsafe cast in swap and uniswapV3SwapCallback functions can lead to attack
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The swap and uniswapV3SwapCallback functions performs an unsafe cast of a uint256 type to a signed integer. amountReceived = uint256-projectTokenIsZero ? amount0 : amount1; Note that amount is chosen by the caller and when choosing amount = 2256 - 1, thi...
Minting exposes beneficiaries to unlimited slippage while minting the token out, sending back the token in the terminal.
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The amount of tokens minted/assets received when minting can be manipulated to an unlimited extent by manipulating the reserves of the pool. Proof of Concept Here the mint function mints the tokens out to the beneficiary. However the Delegate can't speci...
The return value of an external transfer call is not checked on the function uniswapV3SwapCallback in the contract named JBXBuybackDelegate
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Several tokens do not revert in case of failure and return false. If one of these tokens is used in MyBank, deposit will not revert if the transfer fails, and an attacker can call deposit for free...
Always mint 1 wei when _data.preferClaimedTokens is false
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact File: JBXBuybackDelegate.sol 183 function didPayJBDidPayData calldata data external payable override --skip-- 188 uint256 tokenCount = mintedAmount; 189 mintedAmount = 1; --skip-- 200 if data.preferClaimedTokens --skip-- 206 else 207 mintdata, tokenCount...
CVE-2023-31655
A vulnerability was found in the Redis package. This security flaw causes a segmentation violation in redisraft.c. Mitigation Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deploymen...
Attacker can front-run didPay() by calling payParams() to set mintedAmount & reservedRate, reducing output amount
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Attacker can front-run didPay by calling payParams to set mintedAmount & reservedRate. This will reduce the output amount the caller to didPay was expecting to receive. Proof of Concept Anyone can call payParams and provide arbitrary input to set...
TEST-medium
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Proof of Concept Provide direct links to all referenced code in GitHub. Add screenshots, logs, or any other relevant proof that illustrates the concept. Tools Used Recommended Mitigation Steps Assessed...
New finding
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Proof of Concept Provide direct links to all referenced code in GitHub. Add screenshots, logs, or any other relevant proof that illustrates the concept. Tools Used Recommended Mitigation Steps Assessed...
TEST-high risk
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Proof of Concept Provide direct links to all referenced code in GitHub. Add screenshots, logs, or any other relevant proof that illustrates the concept. Tools Used Recommended Mitigation Steps Assessed...
CVE-2023-32313
A flaw was found in the vm2. After making a vm, the inspect method is read-write for console.log, which allows an attacker to edit options for console.log. This issue impacts the integrity by changing the log subsystem. Mitigation After creating a vm, make the inspect method readonly with...