All the funds will be lost if the destination bridge is paused

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Destination bridge is pausable, so if for a chain a destination bridge is paused, all the funds being bridged from different source bridges from different chains will be lost. Proof of Concept Destination bridge inherits from the openzeppelin pausable.so...

The rUSDY.transferFrom function can cause reentrancy if is a contract been approved

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The rUSDY.transferFrom function can cause reentrancy if is a contract been approved, the function looks like: function transferFrom address sender, address recipient, uint256 amount public returns bool uint256 currentAllowance = allowancessendermsg.sende...

Tokens transferred with bridge can get lost if destination transaction can’t be executed

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User could lost his tokens, if tx on destination chain will failrevert. There is no option to recover the tokens on source chain. Revert could be cause by function attachThreshold. This function finds the correspondence between the amount and threshhold...

Updating closed ranges with overrideRange() causes incorrect prevRangeClosePrice.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Incorrect starting prices for ranges Incorrect historical price derivations Loss of accurate price data history Proof of Concept updating closed ranges with overrideRange can cause an incorrect prevRangeClosePrice value. Here is a more detailed...

_execute can be reorder a batch of commands while executing

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Lets see what is written in by Axelar: AxelarGatewayMultisig.execute takes a signed batch of commands. Each command has a corresponding commandID. This is guaranteed to be unique from the Axelar network. execute intentionally allows retrying a commandID ...

Incorrect calculation of totalSupply(), balanceOf() in rUSDY.sol if the rate is unlinked from $1

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In rUSDY.sol, the functions totalSupply, balanceOf are calculated. totalSupply : function totalSupply public view returns uint256 return totalShares oracle.getPrice / 1e18 BPSDENOMINATOR; balanceOf : function balanceOfaddress account public view returns...

Precision Error in getPrice due to Omission of Last Day's Interest

Lines of code Vulnerability details The code attempts to calculate the price based on the interest from the previous day by using range.end - 1. However, if the last day represented by range.end has fully passed, the interest for this day is never taken into account. Over time, these slight...

Rounding in the unwrap function in rUSDY may cause fund loss for users.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Rouding with BPSDENOMINATOR in function unwrap in rUSDY.sol may cause users to be transfered back less than expected USDY. POC The rUSDY.sol contract provides a way to wrap an amount of USDY as shares in order to gain profit in rUSDY. This is done throug...

Critical Reentrancy Vulnerability in _mintIfThresholdMet Function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The mintIfThresholdMet function contains a severe reentrancy vulnerability that can be exploited by malicious contracts. When the TOKEN.mint function is called and tokens are minted for txn.sender, the txn.amount is subsequently set to 0 by deleting...

The user will receive more/less funds when calling unwrap() if the price of USDY falls/rises than expected

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There is a wrap function called by users to wrap their USDY tokens . In the future, to withdraw tokens, the user calls the unwrap function . However, in the unwrap function, the user can have more funds in case the price of USDY falls. Based on the case...

In case of accrual of additional income for holding rUSDY tokens, the protocol is subject to a flashloan attack

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact rUSDY is the rebasing variant of USDY token, and is heavily based on other rebasing tokens such as stETH. Users are able to acquire rUSDY tokens by calling the wrapuint256 function on the contract. Where as the price of a single USDY token varies over...

Maybe you get the same txnHash for different transactions in DestinationBridge._execute()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact DestinationBridge.execute is a function that is executed when contract is called by Axelar Gateway -L114. The function calculates bytes32 txnHash = keccak256payload. txnHash is calculated based on payload. However, srcChain is not taken into account in...

CVE-2023-4015

A use-after-free flaw was found in the Linux kernel's netfilter: nftables component, which can be exploited to achieve local privilege escalation. On an error when building a nftables rule, deactivating immediate expressions in nftimmediatedeactivate can unbind the chain and objects can be...

CVE-2023-3777

A use-after-free flaw was found in the Linux kernel's netfilter: nftables component, which can be exploited to achieve local privilege escalation. When nftablesdelrule is flushing table rules, it is not checked whether the chain is bound, and the chain's owner rule can release the objects in...

CISA Releases Update to Threat Actors Exploiting Citrix CVE-2023-3519 to Implant Webshells

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA has released an update to a previously published Cybersecurity Advisory CSA, Threat Actors Exploiting Citrix CVE-2023-3519 to Implant Webshells. The CSA—originally released to warn network defenders of critical infrastructure organizations...

medialabs.asia Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-3651658

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...

CVE-2022-48174

A vulnerability was found in the BusyBox package. This issue occurs via a stack overflow vulnerability in ash.c in BusyBox, which may allow arbitrary code execution. Mitigation Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options don't meet the Red Hat Product...

Zero Redemption Amount in RdpxDecayingBonds Contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The redeem function, as described, checks whether the assets to be redeemed assets are not zero. This check is in place to ensure that a user isn't redeeming a non-zero amount of rdpxAmount tokens in exchange for zero assets. Such a check is essential to...

The order of decreasing total stake for the old delegate and increasing for the new delegate could lead to issues if one reverts but not the other.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Proof of Concept The potential issue is: decreaseTotalStake succeeds in decreasing the old delegate's stake increaseTotalStake reverts and does not increase the new delegate's stake This would incorrect...

Calling withdraw on a delegated amount of WETH doesn't subtract from totalWethDelegated

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The contract's WETH amount gets permanently bricked. Proof of Concept A user can call addToDelegate and give WETH, that other people can use for bonding with their rDPX in exchange for a certain percentage appointed by the delegatee. Delegate memory...