wrong calculation in MarketFees._getFees

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact when calculating the royalty the loop start with 1 so creatorShares0 is skipped and not correctly converted his share so he can get more royalty than others creators Proof of Concept Provide direct links to all referenced code in GitHub. Add screenshots,...

Functions quitLock and delegate fundamentally change game theory of VoteEscrow

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Without delegation it is not possible to remove voting power before the end of a lock. Function quitLock now makes this possible, but it does not just affect the user who quits the lock. Any votes that are delegated to them are temporarily lost from the...

Unsafe use of transfer()/transferFrom() with IERC20

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some tokens do not implement the ERC20 standard properly but are still accepted by most code that accepts ERC20 tokens. For example Tether USDT's transfer and transferFrom functions do not return booleans as the specification requires, and instead have n...

User can have full voting power with virtually no lockup using multiple locks and delegation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User receives voting power of max lock but only locks for a minimal amount of time Proof of Concept In VotingEscrow.solcheckpoint, the duration of the delegatee and the total delegated tokens are used to determine the amount of voting power that a lock...

Take over of AdminRole contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Any user can call the grantAdmin or revokeAdmin method and take control of the contract. Proof of Concept The grantAdmin and revokeAdmin methods are not protected by any type of authentication restriction, when they should have the onlyAdmin modifier. So...

MIMOProxy.sol can change owner, but not all contracts expect it. Registry.getCurrentProxy() can give wrong outputs.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Registry.getCurrentProxy is expected to return the individual Proxy.sol for a user EOA. But Proxy.sol can change its owner, and Registry will not know it. Thus Registry.getCurrentProxy only show a deployers, and it means nothing for the project. Also,...

Manager is able to use swapData.dexTxData to Perform Reentrancy

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Reentrancy here allows a manager to perform multiple operations on a given pool beyond the max limit. Proof of Concept A Manager, using swapData.dexTxData, can reenter MIMO actions performed on the vault he is managing. The manager deploys a FAKE token a...

Registry.sol works bad - it fails to delivere expected functionality

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The description of Registry.sol is following: /// Deploys new proxies via the factory and keeps a registry of owners to proxies. Owners can only /// have one proxy at a time. But it is not. There are multiple problems: 1. Proxy owner can change and will...

Project.changeOrder() might reinitialize already completed task.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact changeOrder can be used to change subcontractor. But if a project builder approves the signature by fault or the contractor is delegated, a malicious contractor and subcontractor might reinitialize an already completed task and complete again to receive...

Malicious delegated contractor can block funding tasks or mark tasks as complete

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A malicious delegated contractor can add a huge number of tasks or one task with a huge cost. This would then pose problems in allocateFunds as tasks could not be funded. Builder could remove delegation for the contractor but couldn't replace the...

Lack of check for fee tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The lendToProject function will receive the cost as an argument. However, some tokens will charge a fee, which might cause the balance of the token in the contract mismatch the cost. File: contracts/Project.sol /// @inheritdoc IProject function...

Calculating project cost is vulnerable to reaching block gas-limit

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The function Project.projectCost calculates the project costs by calculating the sum of all project task costs. However, due to the unbound for loop, iterating over a potentially large amount of project tasks, this function can potentially DoS due to...

Possible to create projects with currency=address(0)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Sometimes it is possible to create projects with currency=address0. Proof of Concept if you call createProject before the contract has been initialized, some areas of the Project service might be denied. Nowhere is it checked that the address is empty,...

Builder can reduce his debt more than expected by replaying signature

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A builder can, after it convened with the lender and an external agent to reduce his debt through escrow, reuse the signature and pass it again to escrow many times. This allows him to reduce his debt more than expected, leaving the lender at a loss. Pro...

Attacker can use the same param to call Community.escrow() multiple times and reduce all the debt

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In Community contract, function escrow is used to reduce debt when lender comed in terms with the builder and agent to reduce debt. It checks that all lender, builder and agent are signed the data. But the issue is there is no nonce value in data which...

Use call() instead of transfer() when transferring ETH in DebtToken

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When transferring ETH, use call instead of transfer. The transfer function only allows the recipient to use 2300 gas. If the recipient uses more than that, transfers will fail. In the future gas costs might change increasing the likelihood of that...

Builder can pay only half of the agreed upon interest on his debt by exploiting daily interest accrual

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Project bulder can get away with paying the community owner only half of the agreed upon interest on his debt. Theoretically, the community owner can defend himself from this exploit, if he's aware of this bug, but chances are that he won’t be aware. Pro...

New owner of user proxy can prevent old owner from using the system

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In deployFor, owner is called if there is already an entry for the provided address. This can be exploited by a sophisticated attacker to make the system completely unusable for a user. Proof Of Concept Alice transfers her proxy to Bob through...

Add members to the not yet created community

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There is a addMember function in the Community. The function accepts data that should be signed by the community.owner and newMemberAddr. // Compute hash from bytes bytes32 hash = keccak256data; // Decode params from data uint256 communityID, address...

No check if 'ecrecover()' fails

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact addMember function makes a call to 'ecrecover' to grab the 'community owner' & 'new member'. The problem is that if 'ecrecover' fails it will return a 0 which is currently not guarded against. This was a problem in the famous Polygon Matic token bug. The...