It might not be possible to applyRewards(), if an amount received is less than 0.05 eth

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability Details Upon claiming Votium rewards, applyRewards is intended to be invoked bi-weekly in order to exchange the tokens for eth and put the eth received back into the strategies. Based on the current ratio it either stakes the amount into safETH or...

VotiumStrategyCore.applyRewards can be sandwhiched to make profit

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact VotiumStrategyCore.applyRewards can be sandwhiched to make profit. Proof of Concept VotiumStrategyCore.applyRewards function will swap all rewards of contract into eth and then stake them into safEth or vEth contract. As result price of afEth token will...

The maxMint check should be cumulatively applied to ensure it's effectiveness

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Circumvention of the maximum minting restriction, since all a receiver need to do is not specify the whole amount of tokens in one attempt and then claim more than the maximum amount Proof of Concept Take a look at LiquidityPool.solL145-L157 /// @notice...

New Ward Can Revoke Admin Access

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A Newly added ward can remove all the wards from the system, including the admin one. Proof of Concept There is not a mechanism to prevent newly added wards from removing everyone else access' to the contracts, including the admin. Tools Used Manual...

Relying on string comparisons to determine which parameter to update in the file() function is brittle and could lead to unintended consequences.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact This can allow unintentionally changing sensitive state variables Proof of Concept The vulnerability arises because: file relies on a simple string comparison of the what parameter to determine which state variable to update. A developer could accidental...

lack of failsafe mechanism to replay the failed transaction between source chain and destination chain. This would lead to loss of funds to user when transaction is failed.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When the transaction fails in any of chain source or destination, it never be replayed. This would lead to loss of assets if the the transaction is target for token transfer. Similarly other issue can happen. Proof of Concept Centrifuge used the cross...

Transactions could be frontrun to deposit assets and collect shares between the deposit request and collection

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Attacker can spoof deposit to get free shares. Proof of Concept requestDeposit - Requests a deposit, locks up the assets. collectDeposit - Collects the shares after deposit execution. The vulnerability arises because: requestDeposit locks up the assets,...

No gas payment is done before calling the callContract in the Router.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the Axelar documentation it is specified that before calling callContract or callContractWithToken the user needs to first prepay the relayers gas fee on the source chain, but since the functions are not payable, nor does call...

An attacker can drain all the tokens from UserEscrow contract.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An user who is allowed to invest can maliciously drain all the tokens from the UserEscrow contract from decreaseDepositRequest and decreaseRedeemRequest of LiquidityPool.sol contract. Both functions are first send to the router and when the call is...

InvestmentManager.requestDeposit Arbitrary send erc20

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact InvestmentManager.requestDeposit. In this function, the SafeTransferLib.safeTransferFrom function is called with an arbitrary from address. This means that the attacker can control who the tokens are transferred from. Proof of Concept Tools Used manual...

Unchecked token transfer

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Unchecked token transfer Proof of Concept Since the contract will work with many different ERC721 tokens, and not all of them are based, for instance, on the OZ ERC721 token contract. And some tokens can return False instead of reverting a transaction in...

yryryserywretsh

Lines of code L1 Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Proof of Concept Provide direct links to all referenced code in GitHub. Add screenshots, logs, or any other relevant proof that illustrates the concept. Tools Used Recommended Mitigation Steps Assess...

test

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Proof of Concept Provide direct links to all referenced code in GitHub. Add screenshots, logs, or any other relevant proof that illustrates the concept. Tools Used Recommended Mitigation Steps Assessed...

delegate ID could differ from the expected order hash if the order hash was manipulated

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A malicious user could create an order hash that does not match the actual order data. When the delegate token is created, the actualDelegateId will be different than the requestedDelegateId calculated from the manipulated createOrderHash. But the check...

An attacker can use the flashloan function with an invalid collateral asset

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function flashloan - allows delegate token owner or approved operator to borrow their underlying tokens for the duration of a single atomic transaction. The function uses Structs.FlashInfo calldata info as an input parameter. Failure to call...

GeVault LP calculations do not use scaling and are vulnerable to deposit attacks

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Currently, getTVL counts all token balances in GeVault, and attackers can manipulate getTVL to implement deposit attacks. Secondly, since the calculation of LP does not use scaling, because there is a precision error in the division, the cost for the...

Compound charges are sent to GeVault, making them potentially vulnerable to theft

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the previous version, the compound fee would be saved in the TokenisableRange before being deposited into LP, and would be deposited into LP after reaching 1%. After reconstruction, the fees are sent directly to GeVault for distribution through getTVL...

The onlySeaport is a single point of failure and a centralization risk

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The onlySeaport holds a lot of power within the system, which can compromise the system integrity and it's permission-less nature. Having a single EOA as onlySeaport is a large centralization risk and a single point of failure. A single private key may b...

getActiveTickIndex implementation error

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The implementation of getActiveTickIndex is wrong, and the searched ticks do not meet expectations, causing funds to be incorrectly allocated to edge ticks, and there is basically no staking income. Proof of Concept // if base token is token0, ticks abov...

Loss of token if a smart contract perform a cross-chain transfer using source bridge

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Loss of a token ownership if a smart contract perform a cross-chain transfer using source bridge Proof of Concept When a caller call burnAndCallAxelar, the token is burnt on source chain and the payload is encoded in this way: bytes memory payload =...