Increasing or decreasing totalVotingPower or individualVotingPower will affect current distributions for users that have not yet claimed.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Altering the totalVotingPower or individualVotingPower will lead to unfair distributions among members that have not yet claimed Proof of Concept A member of a party can call PartyGovernancedistribute which will transfer the specified amount to...

All contributions can get locked in the Crowdfund contract, with no means to refund users or finalize.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact ETHCrowdfundBasefinalize assumes that all contributions are intact, but there is an emergencyExecute function that is capable of spending part of crowdfund eth. If as little as one wei gets spent, Users cannot get refunded, and the Crowdfund will not get...

Users can lose eth when contributing.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When contributing in InitialETHCrowdfund, if minting adjusts the voting power for that user to cap it at totalVotingPower, the user does not get refunded the eth he lost. Proof of Concept PartyGovernanceNFTmint caps the mintedVotingPower at...

payable.transfer() call will result in loss of unused Ether

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact batchContribute function carries out funding and transfer in batches by using the payable.transfer call. This is unsafe as transfer has hard coded gas budget and can fail when the user is a smart contract. This way programmatical usage of batchContribute...

Arthimetic operation result in loss of voting power

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Carrying out calculation of voting power in function finalize based on division with value 1e4, then subtracting it with totalContributions and after that multiplying and dividing again will be a resultant that cause large precision error or even loss of...

share update function in OmniToken.sol has accounting issue in transfer

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Transfer share function in OmniToken.sol can be abused Proof of Concept there is a function, transfer in OmniToken.sol function transferuint96 subId, bytes32 to, uint8 trancheId, uint256 shares external nonReentrant returns bool requiretrancheId...

Upgraded Q -> 2 from #165 [1699030231989]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 165 as 2 risk. The relevant finding follows: Clear safeCan in transferSAFEOwnership Links to affected code Impact Old approval remains even if user gets SAFE again. Proof of Concept There is no removal safeCan at transferSAFEOwnership . When the user gets SAFE...

testing submission form - IGNORE

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Proof of Concept Provide direct links to all referenced code in GitHub. Add screenshots, logs, or any other relevant proof that illustrates the concept. Tools Used Recommended Mitigation Steps Assessed...

Risky use of Static Address

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact We see a native token address used as 0xEeeeeEeeeEeEeeEeEeEeeEEEeeeeEeeeeeeeEEeE which is fine to use to denote native ether, but if this contract were to be deployed in another chain like Polygon, this would cause inconsistency issues. Proof of Concept...

Rewards transfer In fail

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact the rewards transfer in will fail when current VESTINGPERIOD is not finished. Proof of Concept "function getUnvestedAmount public view returns uint256" is used to calculate the rest rewards in current VESTINGPERIOD. if the period is finished, the result...

Staking functionality temporary blocking due to lack of address zero check

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Though lack of zero check issue for the addToBlacklist function is already at the automated findings output, I suppose it is necessary to show the importance of this check here. In case of accidental or malicious the BLACKLISTMANAGERROLE behavior the...

Wrong estimation of acceptable risk of the protocol losses

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The protocol losses in case compromised MINTERS or REDEEMERS can be higher than expected due to the GATEKEEPER suppression. Attacker can frontrun the GATEKEEPER and fill block limit with own transactions while it is profitable. Average losses can be more...

Compromised minter can change route to misdirect user funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The current security assumption revolves around the compromise of a minter, wherein they mint 200k USDe tokens for themselves and subsequently redeem them within the contract. Under this assumption, as long as the gatekeeper key remains secure, the minte...

Temporary DOS attack on users minting and redeeming big amount using EthenaMinting.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The users redeeming and minting using EthenaMinting.sol with a large amount can be vulnerable to DOS attack. Proof of Concept There is a limit on the max amount to redeem and mint in a block. This can be crucial to the users that are minting or redeeming...

closeMarket() can only be called by the market controller but the controller has no function to close a market.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description Due to the restriction on the closeMarket function, only the controller is able to use it, but the controller contract has no way to call it. Impact Since the borrower becomes unable to close a market once it opened, it becomes a big issue as the...

Sanction Bypass Through Depositing to Authorized Borrower's Market

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Wildcat protocol provides lending with lender backed collateral considered as reserves and the ratio must be upheld by the borrower. The protocol team has taken certain steps to prevent interaction with sanctioned users. However, sanction status is only...

Usury from simple mistake

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A borrower making a simple mistake might be forced to pay an extortionate interest rate for en extended period of time. Severity rating I was hovering between Medium and High on this one. Medium because it is based on a user mistake. On the other hand, t...

An underflow occurred during the token transfer.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An underflow can occur during a token transfer when there is insufficient allowance. Proof of Concept function transferFrom address from, address to, uint256 amount external virtual nonReentrant returns bool uint256 allowed = allowancefrommsg.sender; //...

Incorrect Order of Operations in nukeFromOrbit Function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact the nukeFromOrbit function, the nonReentrant modifier is correctly applied. This means that the function cannot be reentered while it is already being executed the problem is that The blockAccountstate, accountAddress function is called before...

Missing functionality required to allow others access to safe

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Missing functionality prevents ODProxy from granting other accounts access to the safe. In order to grant access to the particular safe for which specific instance of ODProxy is the owner, it is necessary to call allowSAFE on ODSafeManager. This method...