Mint amount calculation in deposit is incorrect

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary The calculation in the deposit function of the DepositPool contract is flawed as it factors the deposited amount into the RSETH price to calculate the amount to mint. Impact When a user deposits in the DepositPool contract, the amount of RSETH to mint i...

Missing slippage check in deposit function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary Users depositing in the protocol have no control over the amount of RSETH minted in return for their deposit. Impact The depositAsset function present in the LRTDepositPool contract allows users to deposit any of the supported assets into the protocol i...

mint with sales option 3 doesn't work as expected

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary lastMintDatecol is set to be higher than expected, which can lead to the minting process being blocked for some time. Vulnerability Details In the mint function in the MintContract if the salesOption of the collection is set to 3 then we can only mint 1...

Adversary can reenter mint to bypass max allowance.

Lines of code github.com/code-423n4/2023-10-nextgen/blob/main/smart-contracts/NextGenCore.solL189-L200 Vulnerability details Description MinterContract.mint calls NextGenCore.mint, which variables that accounts the amount of tokens each user minted is changed only after mintProcessing, that has a...

Limits on mint and redeem per block of USDe will lead to paralysis

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Since the number of mint and redeem per block is limited, attackers can use scripts to squeeze out the quota with their own addresses. Thena cannot determine whether it is a normal user address or an attack address, causing the contract to be paralyzed. ...

Users will retain possession of their USDe after redeeming collateral

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Users will retain possession of their USDe after redeeming their collateral this can lead to theft/loss of funds. Proof of Concept See belo for the coded POC. The benefactor and the beneficiary in the Order struct containing order details and confirmatio...

When Creating a Safe Via ODSafeManager::openSAFE, the User Proxy Is Wrongly Set As the Safe Owner

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact We can observe from Vault721::mint function that the input usr in ODSafeManager::openSAFE function needs to be a previously built proxy of the user address. function mintaddress proxy, uint256 safeId external requiremsg.sender == addresssafeManager, 'V72...

Prime.sol: stakedAt value is not deleted when manually issuing an irrevocable token

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Protocol specifications state that a user cannot have less than the minimum xvs staked if they are not irrevocable prime token users. In other words, only holders of irrevocables prime tokens can have less than the minimum xvs staked. The problem arises...

pendingScoreUpdates counts may be corrupted

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details Prime.pendingScoreUpdates is used to record the number of users whose score needs to be recalculated when addMarket , updateAlpha , updateMultipliers occurs. Record pendingScoreUpdates=totalIrrevocable + totalRevocable when the above metho...

potential overflow in max.Deposit&maxMint; and max.redeem&max;.withdraw

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact there is potential overflow in max.deposit and max.mint Proof of Concept there is only way to decrease max.deposit and max.mint is deposit to be excuted . function deposituint128 trancheTokenAmount, uint128 currencyAmount, address liquidityPool, address...

Missing Ownership Check in mint Function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description: The mint function in the PrincipalToken contract lacks a crucial ownership check before allowing token minting. While it correctly checks if the caller is the delegateToken contract to restrict minting to authorized contracts, it doesn't verify if...

Stealing extra mint fund by applying reentrancy attack on _execute with calling approve() again due to external call before crucial state update

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact By applying reentrancy attack involving the function mintIfThresholdMet, an user can steal extra amount of mint fund. Proof of Concept The functions mintIfThresholdMet make external mint call prior to updating the txnHashToTransaction state. If the real...

PT-2023-8023

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Linux Mint Xreader affected versions not specified Description This issue allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Linux Mint Xreader. User interaction is required to exploit this issue, where the target...

PT-2023-26348 · Linux Mint +2 · Linuxmint +2

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: No vulnerable software or affected versions specified. Description: The issue is not considered a security issue. Recommendations: At the moment, there is no information about a newer version that contains a fix for this issue...

Time Manipulation attack on reliance on block.timestamp for time-sensitive operations.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The block.timestamp allows a miner to call the mint function before the intended starting time mintingAllowedAfter which could lead to time manipulation. Contract name: ArcadeToken.sol Code link: Code line: function mintaddress to, uint256 amount externa...

StandardizedToken can be setup multiple times by anyone. Causing unlimited mint by anyone.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact StandardizedToken can be setup multiple times by anyone. Causing unlimited mint by anyone. Proof of Concept function setupbytes calldata params external override onlyProxy address distributor; address tokenManager; string memory tokenName; tokenManager,...

Addresses in modifier not set correctly

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. Addresses that are mintlimiter but not governance will revert thus being able not to call some functions as intended. Proof of Concept In the comment it was stated that it is either mint limiter or...

balanceOf method can be manipulate to liquidated vault

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Deriving price from balanceOf can be manipulated to liquidate vault see example Attacker can provide ERC20 token to the vaultAsset and mint vault shares. The deposited tokens will then be withdrawn with having same shares in the vault. The shares then wi...

Anyone can mint to themselves type(uint96).max if _isVaultCollateralized() returns true

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There is no check that ensures the caller to mint is a trusted one. Moreover, there is a flaw which lets anyone to mint typeuint96.max number of shares Proof of Concept First, the mint function does not implement any check for the caller to be someone wi...

Decimal is not correct in fee calculation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The decimal doesn't match in the fee calculation, so this will break the fee calculation. Since fee calculation is very important in Mint/Burn actions, this problem can ruin the core functionality of transmuter. Proof of Concept This is the non-exact min...