Cross site scripting

The Limit Login Attempts WordPress plugin before 4.0.72 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, leading to malicious users with administrator privileges to store malicious Javascript code leading to Cross-Site Scripting attacks when unfilteredhtml is disallowed for example in multisite...

CVE-2022-1029

The CVE-2022-1029 entry corresponds to a stored XSS in the Limit Login Attempts WordPress plugin prior to 4.0.72. The vulnerability arises from unsanitized/unescaped settings, enabling administrators to inject JavaScript when unfiltered_html is disallowed (e.g., multisite). Connected documents pr...

Set-Cookie denial of service

A malicious server can serve excessive amounts of Set-Cookie: headers in a HTTP response to curl and curl stores all of them. A sufficiently large amount of big cookies make subsequent HTTP requests to this, or other servers to which the cookies match, create requests that become larger than the...

WordPress plugin Limit Login Attempts 跨站脚本漏洞

WordPress and WordPress plugin are both products of the WordPress Foundation. WordPress is a set of blogging platforms developed using the PHP language. The WordPress plugin is an application plugin. versions of the WordPress Limit Login Attempts plugin prior to 4.0.72 have a cross-site scripting...

CVE-2022-1029: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation

The Limit Login Attempts WordPress plugin before 4.0.72 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, leading to malicious users with administrator privileges to store malicious Javascript code leading to Cross-Site Scripting attacks when unfilteredhtml is disallowed for example in multisite...

PT-2022-13602

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Limit Login Attempts WordPress plugin versions prior to 4.0.72 Description The issue allows malicious users with administrator privileges to store malicious Javascript code, leading to Cross-Site Scripting attacks when unfiltered html is...

Call to lend() function can be frontrunned with fee increase

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Malicious admin could frontrun users lend transaction anytime and set feenominator to any value using setFee and bigger fee than user expected. /// @notice sets the admin address /// @param a address of a new admin /// @return bool true if successful...

Sending batch withdrawal requests can possibly DoS

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The function BatchRequests.sendWithdrawalRequests allows calling the sendWithdrawalRequests function on all of the Yieldy contracts at once. However, due to the unbounded for loop, if many Yieldy contracts are added to contracts, this function can...

Reddit: Rate limit is implemented in Reddit , but its not working .

Vulnerability description not provided...

PT-2022-5386

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions libxml2 versions prior to 2.10.3 Description An issue was discovered in libxml2 where certain invalid XML entity definitions can corrupt a hash table key, potentially leading to subsequent logic errors. In one case, a double-free can be...

WEM deletes registry set by a GPO

Administrator restricted some application execution say PowerShell, Command Prompt through Group Policy which sets following registry and WEM delets it. HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\Explorer\DisallowRun...

Office 365 Config Loophole Opens OneDrive, SharePoint Data to Ransomware Attack

Researchers are warning attackers can abuse Microsoft Office 365 functionality to target files stored on SharePoint and OneDrive in ransomware attacks. Those files, stored via “auto-save” and backed-up in the cloud, typically leave end users with the impression data is shielded from a ransomware...

No checks for the input of borrow cap

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact due to lack of input validation of borrowcap , it can be borrowcap for a ctoken can be 0 and value of 0 corresponds to unlimited borrowing Proof of Concept Tools Used manual reveiw Recommended Mitigation Steps add input validation while using it in loop...

CVE-2022-32983

Knot Resolver through 5.5.1 may allow DNS cache poisoning when there is an attempt to limit forwarding actions by filters...

CVE-2022-32983

Knot Resolver through 5.5.1 may allow DNS cache poisoning when there is an attempt to limit forwarding actions by filters...

in reimburseLiquidityFees() of SponserVault contract swaps tokens without slippage limit so its possible to perform sandwich attack and it create MEV

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact when code swaps tokens it should specify slippage but in reimburseLiquidityFees code contract calls tokenExchange.swapExactIn without slippage and it's possible to perform sandwich attack and make contract to swap on bad exchange rates and there is MEV...

Admin can set arbitrarily high exchange fees

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Admins can attack users by frontrunning them Poc In the function setProtocolFeeInfinityExchange.sol function setProtocolFeeuint16 protocolFeeBps external onlyOwner PROTOCOLFEEBPS = protocolFeeBps;@audit medium emit NewProtocolFeeprotocolFeeBps; Admins ca...

Current implementation of arbitrary call execute failure handler may break some use case for example NFT bridge.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Current implementation of arbitrary call execute failure handler may break some use case for example NFT Bridge. In the case of NFT Bridge, NFT may be lost forever. This is likely to be happened in the case of out of gas. Proof of Concept Relayer receive...

NO TIMELOCK ON setProtocolFee() CAN LEAD TO SELLERS LOSING THEIR NFTs

Lines of code Vulnerability details NO TIMELOCK ON setProtocolFee CAN LEAD TO SELLERS LOSING THEIR NFTs In InfinityExchange.sol, there is no timelock on setProtocolFee. This is the fee that is applied in orders, and determines how much the Exchange receives in fee VS how much the seller receives...

Upgraded Q -> M from 119 [1655579861612]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 119 as Medium risk. The relevant finding follows: L01: Use .call instead of .send Line References Description It is recommended to use call instead of send because the former fowards all remaining gas with the call, while the latter has a gas limit of 2300. Thi...