Authorization Bypass

angular-jwt is vulnerable to authorization bypasses. The library's whitelist entries are treated as regular expressions meaning that the . separator will match any character. This allows a malicious user to set up a domain name to bypass the whitelist filter e.g. if the entry is example.entry.io,...

Design/Logic Flaw

Auth0 angular-jwt before 0.1.10 treats whiteListedDomains entries as regular expressions, which allows remote attackers with knowledge of the jwtInterceptorProvider.whiteListedDomains setting to bypass the domain whitelist filter via a crafted domain...

CVE-2018-11537

Auth0 angular-jwt before 0.1.10 treats whiteListedDomains entries as regular expressions, which allows remote attackers with knowledge of the jwtInterceptorProvider.whiteListedDomains setting to bypass the domain whitelist filter via a crafted domain...

CVE-2018-11537

Auth0 angular-jwt before 0.1.10 treats whiteListedDomains entries as regular expressions, which allows remote attackers with knowledge of the jwtInterceptorProvider.whiteListedDomains setting to bypass the domain whitelist filter via a crafted domain...

CVE-2018-11537

Auth0 angular-jwt before 0.1.10 treats whiteListedDomains entries as regular expressions, which allows remote attackers with knowledge of the jwtInterceptorProvider.whiteListedDomains setting to bypass the domain whitelist filter via a crafted domain...

CVE-2018-11537

Auth0 angular-jwt before 0.1.10 treats whiteListedDomains entries as regular expressions, which allows remote attackers with knowledge of the jwtInterceptorProvider.whiteListedDomains setting to bypass the domain whitelist filter via a crafted domain...

CVE-2018-11537

Auth0 angular-jwt (before v0.1.10) is affected: entries in whiteListedDomains are treated as regular expressions, allowing a crafted domain to bypass the domain allowlist/whitelist filter. This misinterpretation can enable unauthorized access by crafting domains that match the regex pattern (e.g....

CVE-2018-11537: Improper Input Validation

Auth0 angular-jwt before 0.1.10 treats whiteListedDomains entries as regular expressions, which allows remote attackers with knowledge of the jwtInterceptorProvider.whiteListedDomains setting to bypass the domain whitelist filter via a crafted domain...

PT-2018-10645

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions angular-jwt versions prior to 0.1.10 Description The issue allows remote attackers with knowledge of the jwtInterceptorProvider.whiteListedDomains setting to bypass the domain allowlist filter via a crafted domain. This is because the...

CVE-2016-10555

Since "algorithm" isn't enforced in jwt.decodein jwt-simple 0.3.0 and earlier, a malicious user could choose what algorithm is sent sent to the server. If the server is expecting RSA but is sent HMAC-SHA with RSA's public key, the server will think the public key is actually an HMAC private key...

CVE-2016-10555

Since "algorithm" isn't enforced in jwt.decodein jwt-simple 0.3.0 and earlier, a malicious user could choose what algorithm is sent sent to the server. If the server is expecting RSA but is sent HMAC-SHA with RSA's public key, the server will think the public key is actually an HMAC private key...

Code injection

Since "algorithm" isn't enforced in jwt.decodein jwt-simple 0.3.0 and earlier, a malicious user could choose what algorithm is sent sent to the server. If the server is expecting RSA but is sent HMAC-SHA with RSA's public key, the server will think the public key is actually an HMAC private key...

CVE-2016-10555

Since "algorithm" isn't enforced in jwt.decodein jwt-simple 0.3.0 and earlier, a malicious user could choose what algorithm is sent sent to the server. If the server is expecting RSA but is sent HMAC-SHA with RSA's public key, the server will think the public key is actually an HMAC private key...

CVE-2016-10555

The CVE-2016-10555 issue affects the jwt-simple library (Node.js). It arises because jwt.decode() does not strictly enforce the algorithm, allowing a malicious user to choose the JWT verification algorithm. If a server expects RSA but receives an HMAC-SHA with RSA’s public key, the public key cou...

CVE-2016-10555

Since "algorithm" isn't enforced in jwt.decodein jwt-simple 0.3.0 and earlier, a malicious user could choose what algorithm is sent sent to the server. If the server is expecting RSA but is sent HMAC-SHA with RSA's public key, the server will think the public key is actually an HMAC private key...

PT-2018-4733

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions jwt-simple versions 0.3.0 and earlier Description The issue allows a malicious user to choose the algorithm sent to the server, potentially bypassing authentication. If the server expects RSA but receives HMAC-SHA with RSA's public key, it may...

CVE-2016-10555: Improper Input Validation

Since "algorithm" isn't enforced in jwt.decodein jwt-simple 0.3.0 and earlier, a malicious user could choose what algorithm is sent sent to the server. If the server is expecting RSA but is sent HMAC-SHA with RSA's public key, the server will think the public key is actually an HMAC private key...

Authentication Bypass

json-jwt is vulnerable to authentication bypasses. The library does not properly validate the GCM auth tag length, allowing a malicious user to require at most 256 attempts to forge a valid auth tag...

Auth tag forgery vulnerability with AES-GCM encrypted JWT

Ruby's OpenSSL bindings do not check the length of the supplied authentication tag when decrypting an authenticated encryption mode such as AES-GCM, leaving this up to the authors of a gem/app to implement for properly validating the message. json-jwt was not checking for the authentication tag...

REST API Penetration Testing: Astra

REST API penetration testing is complex due to continuous changes in existing APIs and newly added APIs. Astra can be used by security engineers or developers as an integral part of their process, so they can detect and patch vulnerabilities early during development cycle. Astra can automatically...