4219 matches found
CVE-2025-64642 Mirion Medical EC2 Software NMIS BioDose Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource
NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries...
Incorrect Default Permissions
Overview caffeinated-whale-cli is an A CLI tool to help manage Frappe Docker instances. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Incorrect Default Permissions due to insecure file permissions. The cache directory and database file are created without enforcing restrictive access...
PT-2025-48780
NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries...
SUSE CVE-2025-45311
Insecure permissions in fail2ban-client v0.11.2 allows attackers with limited sudo privileges to perform arbitrary operations as root. NOTE: this is disputed by multiple parties because the action for a triggered rule can legitimately be an arbitrary operation as root. Thus, the software is...
CVE-2025-66266
The RupsMon.exe service executable in UPSilon 2000 has insecure permissions, allowing the 'Everyone' group Full Control. A local attacker can replace the executable with a malicious binary to execute code with SYSTEM privileges or simply change the config path of the service to a command; startin...
CVE-2025-66265
CMService.exe creates the C:\\usr directory and subdirectories with insecure permissions, granting write access to all authenticated users. This allows attackers to replace configuration files such as snmp.conf or hijack DLLs to escalate privileges...
EUVD-2025-199734
Insecure permissions in fail2ban-client v0.11.2 allows attackers with limited sudo privileges to perform arbitrary operations as root...
CVE-2025-45311
Insecure permissions in fail2ban-client v0.11.2 allows attackers with limited sudo privileges to perform arbitrary operations as root. NOTE: this is disputed by multiple parties because the action for a triggered rule can legitimately be an arbitrary operation as root. Thus, the software is...
CVE-2025-45311
Insecure permissions in fail2ban-client v0.11.2 allows attackers with limited sudo privileges to perform arbitrary operations as root. NOTE: this is disputed by multiple parties because the action for a triggered rule can legitimately be an arbitrary operation as root. Thus, the software is...
DEBIAN-CVE-2025-45311
Insecure permissions in fail2ban-client v0.11.2 allows attackers with limited sudo privileges to perform arbitrary operations as root. NOTE: this is disputed by multiple parties because the action for a triggered rule can legitimately be an arbitrary operation as root. Thus, the software is...
CVE-2025-66266
The RupsMon.exe service executable in UPSilon 2000 has insecure permissions, allowing the 'Everyone' group Full Control. A local attacker can replace the executable with a malicious binary to execute code with SYSTEM privileges or simply change the config path of the service to a command; startin...
CVE-2025-66266 Insecure SYSTEM Service Permissions in UPSilon2000V6.0 (RupsMon.exe) leading to trivial Local Privilege Escalation
The RupsMon.exe service executable in UPSilon 2000 has insecure permissions, allowing the 'Everyone' group Full Control. A local attacker can replace the executable with a malicious binary to execute code with SYSTEM privileges or simply change the config path of the service to a command; startin...
CVE-2025-66266
CVE-2025-66266 concerns the RupsMon.exe service executable in UPSilon 2000. The vulnerability stems from insecure permissions that grant the Everyone group Full Control, enabling a local attacker to replace the binary with a malicious one to execute code with SYSTEM privileges or to alter the ser...
EUVD-2025-199688
The RupsMon.exe service executable in UPSilon 2000 has insecure permissions, allowing the 'Everyone' group Full Control. A local attacker can replace the executable with a malicious binary to execute code with SYSTEM privileges or simply change the config path of the service to a command; startin...
CVE-2025-66266 Insecure SYSTEM Service Permissions in UPSilon2000V6.0 (RupsMon.exe) leading to trivial Local Privilege Escalation
The RupsMon.exe service executable in UPSilon 2000 has insecure permissions, allowing the 'Everyone' group Full Control. A local attacker can replace the executable with a malicious binary to execute code with SYSTEM privileges or simply change the config path of the service to a command; startin...
CVE-2025-66265
CMService.exe creates the C:\usr directory and subdirectories with insecure permissions, granting write access to all authenticated users. This allows attackers to replace configuration files such as snmp.conf or hijack DLLs to escalate privileges...
CVE-2025-66265 Insecure permissions in configuration directory (C:\\usr)
CMService.exe creates the C:\usr directory and subdirectories with insecure permissions, granting write access to all authenticated users. This allows attackers to replace configuration files such as snmp.conf or hijack DLLs to escalate privileges...
CVE-2025-66265 Insecure permissions in configuration directory (C:\\usr)
CMService.exe creates the C:\usr directory and subdirectories with insecure permissions, granting write access to all authenticated users. This allows attackers to replace configuration files such as snmp.conf or hijack DLLs to escalate privileges...
CVE-2025-66265
The CVE-2025-66265 entry concerns MegaTec ClientMate’s CMService.exe that creates the C:\usr directory and subdirectories with insecure permissions, granting write access to all authenticated users. This enables attackers to replace configuration files (e.g., snmp.conf) or hijack DLLs to escalate...
CVE-2025-45311
Insecure permissions in fail2ban-client v0.11.2 allows attackers with limited sudo privileges to perform arbitrary operations as root. NOTE: this is disputed by multiple parties because the action for a triggered rule can legitimately be an arbitrary operation as root. Thus, the software is...