OPENSUSE-SU-2020:1001-1 Security update for rubygem-puma

This update for rubygem-puma to version 4.3.5 fixes the following issues: - CVE-2020-11077: Fixed a HTTP smuggling issue related to proxy usage bsc1172175. - CVE-2020-11076: Fixed a HTTP smuggling issue when using an invalid transfer-encoding header bsc1172176. - Disabled TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1...

OPENSUSE-SU-2020:0990-1 Security update for rubygem-puma

This update for rubygem-puma to version 4.3.5 fixes the following issues: - CVE-2020-11077: Fixed a HTTP smuggling issue related to proxy usage bsc1172175. - CVE-2020-11076: Fixed a HTTP smuggling issue when using an invalid transfer-encoding header bsc1172176. - Disabled TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1...

Security update for rubygem-puma (moderate)

openSUSE Security Update: Security update for rubygem-puma Announcement ID: openSUSE-SU-2020:1001-1 Rating: moderate References: 1172175 1172176 Cross-References: CVE-2020-11076 CVE-2020-11077 Affected Products: openSUSE Leap 15.2 An update that fixes two vulnerabilities is now available...

Security update for rubygem-puma (moderate)

openSUSE Security Update: Security update for rubygem-puma Announcement ID: openSUSE-SU-2020:0990-1 Rating: moderate References: 1172175 1172176 Cross-References: CVE-2020-11076 CVE-2020-11077 Affected Products: openSUSE Leap 15.1 An update that fixes two vulnerabilities is now available...

SUSE-SU-2020:1919-1 Security update for rubygem-puma

This update for rubygem-puma to version 4.3.5 fixes the following issues: - CVE-2020-11077: Fixed a HTTP smuggling issue related to proxy usage bsc1172175. - CVE-2020-11076: Fixed a HTTP smuggling issue when using an invalid transfer-encoding header bsc1172176. - Disabled TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1...

CVE-2020-1350 Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution (SigRed)

A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Windows Domain Name System servers when they fail to properly handle requests, aka ‘Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability’. Recent assessments: gwillcox-r7 at July 14, 2020 6:11pm UTC reported: Important Update: This is now supposed...

HTTP Request Smuggling

Overview tinyhttp is a Low level HTTP server library Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to HTTP Request Smuggling. HTTP pipelining issues and request smuggling attacks might be possible due to incorrect Transfer encoding header parsing. It is possible conduct HTTP request smuggling...

UBUNTU-CVE-2018-21245

Pound before 2.8 allows HTTP request smuggling, a related issue to CVE-2016-10711...

Apache Traffic Server - HTTP Smuggling and Cache poisoning

According to the result of a remote check, the target Apache Traffic Server does not have a patch applied to mitigate HTTP Smuggling and HTTP cache poisoning which was put in place in versions greater than 6.2.3 and 7.1.4. A remote unauthenticated attacker could exploit this to gain access to...

UBUNTU-CVE-2020-10719

A flaw was found in Undertow in versions before 2.1.1.Final, regarding the processing of invalid HTTP requests with large chunk sizes. This flaw allows an attacker to take advantage of HTTP request smuggling...

netty: HTTP request smuggling

A HTTP smuggling flaw was found in HttpObjectDecoder.java in Netty in versions prior to version 4.1.44. HTTP headers with an invalid fold, in this case CRLF carriage return, line feed without being followed by SP space or HTAB horizontal tab, result in situations where headers can be misread. Dat...

Puma Environment Error Vulnerability (CNVD-2020-31666)

Puma is a web server for highly concurrent applications. Puma suffers from an environment error vulnerability. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to conduct HTTP smuggling attacks with an invalid transfer-encoding header...

CVE-2020-11077 HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...

GHSA-W64W-QQPH-5GXM HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

Impact This is a similar but different vulnerability to the one patched in 3.12.5 and 4.3.4. A client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via...

HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

Impact This is a similar but different vulnerability to the one patched in 3.12.5 and 4.3.4. A client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via...

GHSA-X7JG-6PWG-FX5H HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

Impact By using an invalid transfer-encoding header, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response. Originally reported by @ZeddYu, who has our thanks for the detailed report. Patches The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4. For more information If you have any questions or comments...

HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

Impact By using an invalid transfer-encoding header, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response. Originally reported by @ZeddYu, who has our thanks for the detailed report. Patches The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4. For more information If you have any questions or comments...

CVE-2020-11076 HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.4 and 3.12.5, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response, by using an invalid transfer-encoding header. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4...

CVE-2020-11076

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.4 and 3.12.5, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response, by using an invalid transfer-encoding header. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4...

HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

Impact This is a similar but different vulnerability to the one patched in 3.12.5 and 4.3.4. A client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via...