Lucene search
+L

40 matches found

RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
added 3 days ago5 views

CVE-2026-16318

A flaw was found in s2n-tls, a Transport Layer Security TLS implementation. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit a memory leak in the QUIC transport parameters extension handler. By repeatedly forcing HelloRetryRequests during a TLS 1.3 connection, an attacker can cause the server proce...

6.9CVSS5.5AI score0.00388EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
NVD
NVD
added 4 days ago4 views

CVE-2026-16318

The QUIC transport parameters extension handler in s2n-tls incorrectly uses s2nalloc instead of s2nrealloc to store the peer's transport parameters. When a TLS 1.3 connection goes through a HelloRetryRequest, the handler is called twice on the same connection. On the second call, s2nalloc zeroes...

6.9CVSS0.00388EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 4 days ago22 views

CVE-2026-16318 QUIC Transport Parameters Memory Leak During HelloRetryRequest in s2n-tls

The QUIC transport parameters extension handler in s2n-tls incorrectly uses s2nalloc instead of s2nrealloc to store the peer's transport parameters. When a TLS 1.3 connection goes through a HelloRetryRequest, the handler is called twice on the same connection. On the second call, s2nalloc zeroes...

6.9CVSS0.00388EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
EUVD
EUVD
added 4 days ago6 views

EUVD-2026-46402

The QUIC transport parameters extension handler in s2n-tls incorrectly uses s2nalloc instead of s2nrealloc to store the peer's transport parameters. When a TLS 1.3 connection goes through a HelloRetryRequest, the handler is called twice on the same connection. On the second call, s2nalloc zeroes...

6.9CVSS5.3AI score0.00388EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CVE
CVE
added 4 days ago9 views

CVE-2026-16318

The CVE-2026-16318 issue affects server-side QUIC deployments using s2n-tls, where the QUIC transport parameters extension handler uses s2n_alloc instead of s2n_realloc. During TLS 1.3 HelloRetryRequest, the handler runs twice on the same connection; on the second run it zeroes the existing point...

6.9CVSS5.3AI score0.00388EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
OSV
OSV
added 4 days ago4 views

CVE-2026-16318 QUIC Transport Parameters Memory Leak During HelloRetryRequest in s2n-tls

The QUIC transport parameters extension handler in s2n-tls incorrectly uses s2nalloc instead of s2nrealloc to store the peer's transport parameters. When a TLS 1.3 connection goes through a HelloRetryRequest, the handler is called twice on the same connection. On the second call, s2nalloc zeroes...

6.9CVSS5.3AI score0.00388EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
added 4 days ago5 views

PT-2026-62072

The QUIC transport parameters extension handler in s2n-tls incorrectly uses s2n alloc instead of s2n realloc to store the peer's transport parameters. When a TLS 1.3 connection goes through a HelloRetryRequest, the handler is called twice on the same connection. On the second call, s2n alloc zero...

6.9CVSS5.3AI score0.00388EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
OSV
OSV
added 2026/07/14 9:41 p.m.13 views

JLSEC-2026-704 Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in...

Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...

2.7CVSS6.1AI score0.00209EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
added 2026/03/20 4:9 p.m.6 views

CVE-2026-3230

A flaw was found in wolfSSL. A remote attacker could exploit a missing cryptographic step in the Transport Layer Security TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic. By sending a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension, an...

2.7CVSS5.8AI score0.00209EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Snyk
Snyk
added 2026/03/19 10:45 p.m.4 views

Missing Cryptographic Step

Overview Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Missing Cryptographic Step due to missing validation in the keyshare process during the TLS 1.3 HelloRetryRequest handshake. An attacker can compromise the confidentiality of encrypted communications by sending a crafted HelloRetryReque...

2.7CVSS5.8AI score0.00209EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
NVD
NVD
added 2026/03/19 9:17 p.m.9 views

CVE-2026-3230

Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...

2.7CVSS0.00209EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
OSV
OSV
added 2026/03/19 9:17 p.m.16 views

UBUNTU-CVE-2026-3230

Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...

2.7CVSS5.8AI score0.00209EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
UbuntuCve
UbuntuCve
added 2026/03/19 9:17 p.m.5 views

CVE-2026-3230

Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...

2.7CVSS5.9AI score0.00209EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
CVE
CVE
added 2026/03/19 8:59 p.m.18 views

CVE-2026-3230

wolfSSL’s TLS 1.3 client logic is affected by an improper key_share handling during HelloRetryRequest, allowing a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello without the key_share extension to derive predictable traffic secrets from the (EC)DHE shared secret. Affected component: TLS hands...

2.7CVSS5.8AI score0.00209EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
added 2026/03/19 8:59 p.m.4 views

CVE-2026-3230 Improper key_share validation in TLS 1.3 HelloRetryRequest

Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...

2.1CVSS5.8AI score0.00209EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
AlpineLinux
AlpineLinux
added 2026/03/19 8:59 p.m.7 views

CVE-2026-3230

Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required keyshare extension,...

2.7CVSS5.8AI score0.00209EPSS
SaveExploits0
CNNVD
CNNVD
added 2026/03/19 12:0 a.m.15 views

wolfSSL(CyaSSL) 安全漏洞

wolfSSL CyaSSL is a small, portable embedded SSL programming library developed by the American company wolfSSL, designed for developers working with embedded systems. wolfSSL CyaSSL contains a security vulnerability. This vulnerability stems from the lack of necessary encryption steps in the TLS...

2.7CVSS5.8AI score0.00209EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
added 2026/03/19 12:0 a.m.16 views

PT-2026-26366

Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key share extension,...

2.1CVSS5.8AI score0.00209EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Tenable Nessus
Tenable Nessus
added 2026/03/16 12:0 a.m.12 views

OpenSSL 3.6.0 < 3.6.2 Multiple Vulnerabilities

The version of OpenSSL installed on the remote host is prior to 3.6.2. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the 3.6.2 advisory. - Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group...

9.8CVSS7.5AI score0.01202EPSS
SaveExploits0References27
SUSE CVE
SUSE CVE
added 2026/03/15 12:25 a.m.8 views

SUSE CVE-2026-2673

Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes the default by using the 'DEFAULT' keyword. Impact summary: A less preferred key exchange may be used even when a more preferred group is...

5.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00435EPSS
SaveExploits0References7
Rows per page
Query Builder