Lucene search
+L

50183 matches found

NVD
NVD
•added 2026/07/07 3:16 p.m.•29 views

CVE-2026-53878

An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16. DomainNameValidator does not prohibit newlines in domain names unless used via a form field, since CharField strips newlines. If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Djan...

6.1CVSS0.00327EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
osv_pysec
osv_pysec
•added 2026/07/07 3:16 p.m.•20 views

PYSEC-2026-2092

An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16. DomainNameValidator does not prohibit newlines in domain names unless used via a form field, since CharField strips newlines. If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Djan...

5.3CVSS6.4AI score0.00327EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
PyPA
PyPA
•added 2026/07/07 3:16 p.m.•33 views

PYSEC-2026-2092

An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16.DomainNameValidator does not prohibit newlines in domain names unless used via a form field, since CharField strips newlines. If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Djang...

6.1CVSS6.5AI score0.00327EPSS
SaveExploits0References4Affected Software1
osv_ubuntu
osv_ubuntu
•added 2026/07/07 3:16 p.m.•27 views

UBUNTU-CVE-2026-53878

An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16. DomainNameValidator does not prohibit newlines in domain names unless used via a form field, since CharField strips newlines. If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Djan...

6.1CVSS6.4AI score0.00327EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
UbuntuCve
UbuntuCve
•added 2026/07/07 3:16 p.m.•26 views

CVE-2026-53878

An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16. DomainNameValidator does not prohibit newlines in domain names unless used via a form field, since CharField strips newlines. If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Djan...

6.1CVSS6.4AI score0.00327EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
SUSE CVE
SUSE CVE
•added 2026/07/07 3:13 p.m.•30 views

SUSE CVE-2026-54764

Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to v2.11.51, v3.6.22, and v3.7.6, Traefik's ForwardAuth middleware, even when configured with trustForwardHeader: false, derives the X-Forwarded-Port header sent to the authentication service from the original incoming request instead of t...

5.3CVSS5.5AI score0.00281EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
osv_pysec
osv_pysec
•added 2026/07/07 2:34 p.m.•70 views

PYSEC-2026-1433 Gunicorn HTTP Request/Response Smuggling vulnerability

Gunicorn version 21.2.0 does not properly validate the value of the 'Transfer-Encoding' header as specified in the RFC standards, which leads to the default fallback method of 'Content-Length,' making it vulnerable to TE.CL request smuggling. This vulnerability can lead to cache poisoning, data...

7.5CVSS7.1AI score0.00806EPSS
SaveExploits0References9
osv_pysec
osv_pysec
•added 2026/07/07 2:34 p.m.•29 views

PYSEC-2026-1995 urllib3's Proxy-Authorization request header isn't stripped during cross-origin redirects

When using urllib3's proxy support with ProxyManager, the Proxy-Authorization header is only sent to the configured proxy, as expected. However, when sending HTTP requests without using urllib3's proxy support, it's possible to accidentally configure the Proxy-Authorization header even though it...

4.4CVSS6.5AI score0.01141EPSS
SaveExploits2References10
PyPA
PyPA
•added 2026/07/07 2:34 p.m.•29 views

urllib3's Proxy-Authorization request header isn't stripped during cross-origin redirects

When using urllib3's proxy support with ProxyManager, the Proxy-Authorization header is only sent to the configured proxy, as expected.However, when sending HTTP requests without using urllib3's proxy support, it's possible to accidentally configure the Proxy-Authorization header even though it...

6.5CVSS6.5AI score0.01141EPSS
SaveExploits2References10Affected Software1
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/07/07 2:12 p.m.•62 views

CVE-2026-59709 Ghostfolio - Unauthorized Portfolio Holding Tag Modification via Missing Permission Check

Ghostfolio's PUT /api/v1/portfolio/holding/:dataSource/:symbol/tags endpoint fails to verify Access.permissions field when processing the Impersonation-Id header, allowing read-only access grantees to modify portfolio holding tags. Attackers with valid read-only share tokens can assign or remove...

5.3CVSS0.00336EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/07/07 2:12 p.m.•44 views

CVE-2026-59709

Ghostfolio CVE-2026-59709 affects the PUT /api/v1/portfolio/holding/:dataSource/:symbol/tags endpoint. The root cause is a missing verification of Access.permissions when processing the Impersonation-Id header, allowing read-only access grantees to modify portfolio holding tags. Attackers with va...

5.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00336EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/07/07 2:12 p.m.•29 views

EUVD-2026-42046

Ghostfolio's PUT /api/v1/portfolio/holding/:dataSource/:symbol/tags endpoint fails to verify Access.permissions field when processing the Impersonation-Id header, allowing read-only access grantees to modify portfolio holding tags. Attackers with valid read-only share tokens can assign or remove...

5.3CVSS5.9AI score0.00336EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
osv_cve
osv_cve
•added 2026/07/07 2:12 p.m.•20 views

CVE-2026-59709 Ghostfolio - Unauthorized Portfolio Holding Tag Modification via Missing Permission Check

Ghostfolio's PUT /api/v1/portfolio/holding/:dataSource/:symbol/tags endpoint fails to verify Access.permissions field when processing the Impersonation-Id header, allowing read-only access grantees to modify portfolio holding tags. Attackers with valid read-only share tokens can assign or remove...

5.3CVSS5.9AI score
SaveExploits0References6
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/07/07 2:12 p.m.•16 views

CVE-2026-59709 Ghostfolio - Unauthorized Portfolio Holding Tag Modification via Missing Permission Check

Ghostfolio's PUT /api/v1/portfolio/holding/:dataSource/:symbol/tags endpoint fails to verify Access.permissions field when processing the Impersonation-Id header, allowing read-only access grantees to modify portfolio holding tags. Attackers with valid read-only share tokens can assign or remove...

5.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00336EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
attackerkb
attackerkb
•added 2026/07/07 2:12 p.m.•23 views

CVE-2026-59709

Ghostfolio's PUT /api/v1/portfolio/holding/:dataSource/:symbol/tags endpoint fails to verify Access.permissions field when processing the Impersonation-Id header, allowing read-only access grantees to modify portfolio holding tags. Attackers with valid read-only share tokens can assign or remove...

5.3CVSS5.9AI score0.00336EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/07/07 2:10 p.m.•17 views

CVE-2026-53878 Header injection possibility since DomainNameValidator accepted newlines in input

An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16. DomainNameValidator does not prohibit newlines in domain names unless used via a form field, since CharField strips newlines. If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Djan...

6.1CVSS6.4AI score0.00327EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
osv_cve
osv_cve
•added 2026/07/07 2:10 p.m.•27 views

CVE-2026-53878 Header injection possibility since DomainNameValidator accepted newlines in input

An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16. DomainNameValidator does not prohibit newlines in domain names unless used via a form field, since CharField strips newlines. If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Djan...

5.3CVSS5.8AI score
SaveExploits0References7
Mend
Mend
•added 2026/07/07 2:10 p.m.•5 views

CVE-2026-53878

An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16. "DomainNameValidator" does not prohibit newlines in domain names unless used via a form field, since "CharField" strips newlines. If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur...

6.1CVSS6.4AI score0.00327EPSS
SaveExploits0References14
Debian CVE
Debian CVE
•added 2026/07/07 2:10 p.m.•36 views

CVE-2026-53878

An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16. DomainNameValidator does not prohibit newlines in domain names unless used via a form field, since CharField strips newlines. If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Djan...

6.1CVSS6.4AI score0.00327EPSS
SaveExploits0
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/07/07 2:10 p.m.•25 views

EUVD-2026-42045

An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.7 and 5.2 before 5.2.16. DomainNameValidator does not prohibit newlines in domain names unless used via a form field, since CharField strips newlines. If an application uses values with newlines in an HTTP response, header injection can occur. Djan...

6.1CVSS6.4AI score0.00327EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Rows per page
Query Builder