Xerver HTTP Response Splitting

The version of Xerver running on the remote host has an HTTP response splitting vulnerability due to its failure to sanitize specially encoded carriage return and newline characters. A remote attacker could exploit this by tricking a user into requesting a maliciously crafted URL, resulting in th...

Xerver HTTP Response Splitting Vulnerability

Xerver is prone to an HTTP response-splitting vulnerability because it fails to sufficiently sanitize user-supplied data. Attackers can leverage this issue to influence or misrepresent how web content is served, cached, or interpreted. This could aid in various attacks that try to entice client...

Xerver 4.31, 4.32 HTTP Response Splitting

Discovered: 04-10-08 By: SecureState R&D Team - sasquatch Vendor Notified: 04-11-08 Vendor Response: 04-13-08 Vendor Notified: 10-07-09 Vendor Response: NONE Published: 11-18-09 Proof of Concept:...

cups: Several XSS flaws in forms processed by CUPS web interface

The web interface in CUPS before 1.4.2, as used on Apple Mac OS X before 10.6.2 and other platforms, does not properly handle 1 HTTP headers and 2 HTML templates, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting XSS attacks and HTTP response splitting attacks via vectors related to a...

Xerver 4.31/4.32 - HTTP Response Splitting

Xerver 4.31, 4.32 HTTP Response Splitting Discovered: 04-10-08 By: SecureState R&D Team - sasquatch Vendor Notified: 04-11-08 Vendor Response: 04-13-08 New version also vulnerable: 10-07-09 Tested Win32 v4.32 Vendor Notified: 10-07-09 Vendor Response: NONE Published: 11-18-09 Proof of Concept:...

Xerver 4.314.32 - HTTP Response Splitting

Xerver 4.314.32 - HTTP Response Splitting Xerver 4.31, 4.32 HTTP Response Splitting Discovered: 04-10-08 By: SecureState R&D Team - sasquatch Vendor Notified: 04-11-08 Vendor Response: 04-13-08 New version also vulnerable: 10-07-09 Tested Win32 v4.32 Vendor Notified: 10-07-09 Vendor Response: NON...

Xerver 4.31 4.32 HTTP Response Splitting

No description provided by source. Xerver 4.31, 4.32 HTTP Response Splitting Discovered: 04-10-08 By: SecureState R&D Team - sasquatch Vendor Notified: 04-11-08 Vendor Response: 04-13-08 New version also vulnerable: 10-07-09 Tested Win32 v4.32 Vendor Notified: 10-07-09 Vendor Response: NONE...

Xerver 4.31, 4.32 HTTP Response Splitting

Exploit for unknown platform in category web applications ========================================= Xerver 4.31, 4.32 HTTP Response Splitting ========================================= Xerver 4.31, 4.32 HTTP Response Splitting Discovered: 04-10-08 By: SecureState R&D Team - sasquatch Vendor...

CVE-2009-2820

The web interface in CUPS before 1.4.2, as used on Apple Mac OS X before 10.6.2 and other platforms, does not properly handle 1 HTTP headers and 2 HTML templates, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting XSS attacks and HTTP response splitting attacks via vectors related to a...

CVE-2009-2820

The web interface in CUPS before 1.4.2, as used on Apple Mac OS X before 10.6.2 and other platforms, does not properly handle 1 HTTP headers and 2 HTML templates, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting XSS attacks and HTTP response splitting attacks via vectors related to a...

Cross site scripting

The web interface in CUPS before 1.4.2, as used on Apple Mac OS X before 10.6.2 and other platforms, does not properly handle 1 HTTP headers and 2 HTML templates, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting XSS attacks and HTTP response splitting attacks via vectors related to a...

CVE-2009-2820

The web interface in CUPS before 1.4.2, as used on Apple Mac OS X before 10.6.2 and other platforms, does not properly handle 1 HTTP headers and 2 HTML templates, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting XSS attacks and HTTP response splitting attacks via vectors related to a...

CVE-2009-2820

The web interface in CUPS before 1.4.2, as used on Apple Mac OS X before 10.6.2 and other platforms, does not properly handle 1 HTTP headers and 2 HTML templates, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting XSS attacks and HTTP response splitting attacks via vectors related to a...

CVE-2009-2820

CVE-2009-2820 affects CUPS (web interface) prior to 1.4.2 on macOS X

Apple Plugs 58 Holes in Monster Mac OS X Update

Apple has dropped another mega-patch to cover a total of 58 documented vulnerabilities affecting the Mac OS X ecosystem. The majority of the flaws could allow a remote attacker to gain complete control of an unpatched system, meaning that this update carries an “extremely critical rating.” It...

RHEL 3 / 4 / 5 : flash-plugin (RHSA-2007:1126)

An updated Adobe Flash Player package that fixes a security issue is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 Extras, 4 Extras, and 5 Supplementary. This update has been rated as having critical security impact by the Red Hat Security Response Team. The flash-plugin package contains a...

FormMail 1.92 Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities

Exploit for unknown platform in category web applications ============================================= FormMail 1.92 Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities ============================================= FormMail 1.92 Multiple Vulnerabilities Name Multiple Vulnerabilities in FormMail Systems Affected...

formmail 1.92 - Multiple Vulnerabilities

formmail 1.92 - Multiple Vulnerabilities FormMail 1.92 Multiple Vulnerabilities Name Multiple Vulnerabilities in FormMail Systems Affected FormMail 1.92 and possibly earlier versions Severity Medium Impact CVSSv2 Medium 4.3/10, vector: AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N Vendor...

Cacti < 0.8.7b Multiple Input Validation Vulnerabilities

Cacti is prone to multiple unspecified input-validation vulnerabilities. Copyright C 2009 Greenbone Networks GmbH Some text descriptions might be excerpted from a referenced sources, and are Copyright C by the respective right holders. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later This program is fre...

Cacti Multiple Input Validation Vulnerabilities

Cacti is prone to multiple unspecified input-validation vulnerabilities, including: - Multiple cross-site scripting vulnerabilities - Multiple SQL-injection vulnerabilities - An HTTP response-splitting vulnerability. Attackers may exploit these vulnerabilities to influence or misrepresent how web...