Apache Traffic Server (ATS) Multiple Vulnerabilities

Apache Traffic Server is prone to multiple vulnerabilities. SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2017 Greenbone AG Some text descriptions might be excerpted from a referenced sources, and are Copyright C by the respective right holders. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only CPE = "cpe:/a:apache:trafficserver"...

Design/Logic Flaw

Apache Traffic Server 6.0.0 to 6.2.0 are affected by an HPACK Bomb Attack...

CVE-2016-5396

Apache Traffic Server 6.0.0 to 6.2.0 are affected by an HPACK Bomb Attack...

CVE-2016-5396

Apache Traffic Server 6.0.0 to 6.2.0 are affected by an HPACK Bomb Attack...

DEBIAN-CVE-2016-5396

Apache Traffic Server 6.0.0 to 6.2.0 are affected by an HPACK Bomb Attack...

CVE-2016-5396

Apache Traffic Server 6.0.0 to 6.2.0 are affected by an HPACK Bomb Attack...

CVE-2016-5396

Apache Traffic Server (ATS) versions 6.0.0–6.2.0 are affected by an HPACK Bomb Attack. The CVE notes a network-accessible vulnerability with a high impact on availability (CVSS v3 base score 7.5). The related documents consistently describe HPACK Bomb as the issue; no concrete remediation, patch ...

CVE-2016-5396

Apache Traffic Server 6.0.0 to 6.2.0 are affected by an HPACK Bomb Attack...

CVE-2016-5396

Apache Traffic Server 6.0.0 to 6.2.0 are affected by an HPACK Bomb Attack...

CVE-2016-6581

A HTTP/2 implementation built using any version of the Python HPACK library between v1.0.0 and v2.2.0 could be targeted for a denial of service attack, specifically a so-called "HPACK Bomb" attack. This attack occurs when an attacker inserts a header field that is exactly the size of the HPACK...

PYSEC-2017-87

A HTTP/2 implementation built using any version of the Python HPACK library between v1.0.0 and v2.2.0 could be targeted for a denial of service attack, specifically a so-called "HPACK Bomb" attack. This attack occurs when an attacker inserts a header field that is exactly the size of the HPACK...

Design/Logic Flaw

A HTTP/2 implementation built using any version of the Python HPACK library between v1.0.0 and v2.2.0 could be targeted for a denial of service attack, specifically a so-called "HPACK Bomb" attack. This attack occurs when an attacker inserts a header field that is exactly the size of the HPACK...

DEBIAN-CVE-2016-6581

A HTTP/2 implementation built using any version of the Python HPACK library between v1.0.0 and v2.2.0 could be targeted for a denial of service attack, specifically a so-called "HPACK Bomb" attack. This attack occurs when an attacker inserts a header field that is exactly the size of the HPACK...

CVE-2016-6581

A HTTP/2 implementation built using any version of the Python HPACK library between v1.0.0 and v2.2.0 could be targeted for a denial of service attack, specifically a so-called "HPACK Bomb" attack. This attack occurs when an attacker inserts a header field that is exactly the size of the HPACK...

CVE-2016-6581

A HTTP/2 implementation built using any version of the Python HPACK library between v1.0.0 and v2.2.0 could be targeted for a denial of service attack, specifically a so-called "HPACK Bomb" attack. This attack occurs when an attacker inserts a header field that is exactly the size of the HPACK...

HTTP2. 0 Protocol is aeration 4 high-risk vulnerabilities can cause server to crash-bug warning-the black bar safety net

! If you think that HTTP2. 0 Protocol than the standard HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol more secure, then you're wrong. Researchers spent 4 months in HTTP2. 0 Protocol found 4 vulnerabilities that! Last 2 month, Google put their SPDY project bundled into HTTP2. 0, intended to strengthen the page...

4 Flaws hit HTTP/2 Protocol that could allow Hackers to Disrupt Servers

If you think that the HTTP/2 protocol is more secure than the standard HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, then you might be wrong, as it took researchers just four months to discover four flaws in the HTTP/2 protocol. HTTP/2 was launched properly just in May last year after Google bundled its SPDY...