PT-2024-36807 · Fort · Fort

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Fort versions 1.6.3 through 1.6.4 Description: An integer underflow was discovered in Fort, allowing a malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor to serve a Manifest RPKI object containing an empty fileList. This caus...

CVE-2024-56375

An integer underflow was discovered in Fort 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 before 1.6.5. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP a Manifest RPKI object containing an empty fileList. Fort dereferences and, shortly afterwards, writes to this array during a...

CVE-2024-56375

An integer underflow was discovered in Fort 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 before 1.6.5. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP a Manifest RPKI object containing an empty fileList. Fort dereferences and, shortly afterwards, writes to this array during a...

CVE-2024-56170

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent...

CVE-2024-56170

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent...

DEBIAN-CVE-2024-56170

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent...

CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...

DEBIAN-CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...

UBUNTU-CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...

UBUNTU-CVE-2024-56170

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent...

PT-2024-36728 · Fort +1 · Fort +1

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Fort versions 1.6.4 and earlier, up to but not including 2.0.0 Description: A validation integrity issue was discovered in the product. RPKI Relying Parties, such as Fort, are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data, which...

CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...

CVE-2024-56170

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent...

CVE-2024-56170

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent...

CVE-2024-56170

Fort Validator (Fort) versions up to 1.6.4 prior to 2.0.0 contain a validation integrity issue in RPKI manifest handling. The root cause is that the system does not compare the up-to-dateness of the most recently fetched manifest against the cached one, allowing a rollback to a valid outdated man...

CVE-2024-56170

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent...

CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...

PT-2024-36729 · Fort +1 · Fort +1

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Fort versions 1.6.4 and earlier, before 2.0.0 Description: A validation integrity issue was discovered in the product. RPKI manifests, which are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify, contain the manifestNumber and...

FORT Validator 安全漏洞

FORT Validator is a NICMx open source RPKI dependency and RTR server. A security vulnerability exists in FORT Validator version 1.6.4 and earlier, which stems from a validation integrity issue that could lead to incomplete routing origin validation data...

CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...