CVE-2025-13476

CVE-2025-13476 affects Rakuten Viber Cloak mode on Android v25.7.2.0g and Windows v25.6.0.0–v25.8.1.0. The root cause is a consistent, static TLS ClientHello fingerprint with a lack of extension diversity, making DPI systems able to identify and block proxy traffic and undermine censorship circum...

CVE-2025-13476 Rakuten Viber uses broken or risky cryptographic Algorithm

Rakuten Viber Cloak mode in Android v25.7.2.0g and Windows v25.6.0.0–v25.8.1.0 uses a static and predictable TLS ClientHello fingerprint lacking extension diversity, allowing Deep Packet Inspection DPI systems to trivially identify and block proxy traffic, undermining censorship circumvention...

Rakuten Viber Desktop 安全漏洞

Rakuten Viber Desktop is a messaging application developed by Luxembourg-based Viber Inc. There is a security vulnerability in Rakuten Viber Desktop, which stems from the use of a static and predictable TLS ClientHello fingerprint. This vulnerability may lead to the identification and prevention ...

PT-2026-23467

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Rakuten Viber versions 25.6.0.0 through 25.8.1.0 Description Rakuten Viber’s Cloak mode on Android version 25.7.2.0g and Windows versions 25.6.0.0 through 25.8.1.0 employs a consistent TLS ClientHello fingerprint that lacks extension diversity...

GHSA-CRMG-9M86-636R lxd's non-recursive certificate listing bypasses per-object authorization and leaks all fingerprints

Summary The GET /1.0/certificates endpoint non-recursive mode returns URLs containing fingerprints for all certificates in the trust store, bypassing the per-object canview authorization check that is correctly applied in the recursive path. Any authenticated identity — including restricted,...

CVE-2026-0017

In onChange of BiometricService.java, there is a possible way to enable fingerprint unlock due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0017

In onChange of BiometricService.java, there is a possible way to enable fingerprint unlock due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0017

In onChange of BiometricService.java, there is a possible way to enable fingerprint unlock due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0017

In onChange of BiometricService.java, there is a possible way to enable fingerprint unlock due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0017

In onChange of BiometricService.java, there is a possible way to enable fingerprint unlock due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0017

In onChange of BiometricService.java, there is a possible way to enable fingerprint unlock due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0017

CVE-2026-0017 is tied to a logic error in BiometricService.java on the Android platform that could allow enabling fingerprint unlock and cause local elevation of privilege without additional execution privileges or user interaction. The vulnerability appears in the onChange path of BiometricServi...

ASB-A-444673089

In onChange of BiometricService.java, there is a possible way to enable fingerprint unlock due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

GO-2026-4509 Fingerprint vulnerability in uTLS from GREASE ECH mismatch for Chrome parrots in github.com/refraction-networking/utls

Fingerprint vulnerability in uTLS from GREASE ECH mismatch for Chrome parrots in github.com/refraction-networking/utls...

Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2026-27017

The Linux/Unix host has one or more packages installed that are impacted by a vulnerability without a vendor supplied patch available. - uTLS is a fork of crypto/tls, created to customize ClientHello for fingerprinting resistance while still using it for the handshake. Versions 1.6.0 through 1.8....

SUSE CVE-2026-27017

uTLS is a fork of crypto/tls, created to customize ClientHello for fingerprinting resistance while still using it for the handshake. Versions 1.6.0 through 1.8.0 contain a fingerprint mismatch with Chrome when using GREASE ECH, related to cipher suite selection. When Chrome selects the preferred...

CVE-2026-27017

A flaw was found in uTLS. When using GREASE Encrypted ClientHello ECH, uTLS versions 1.6.0 through 1.8.0 may exhibit a fingerprint mismatch with Chrome. This occurs due to an inconsistent selection of cipher suites between the outer ClientHello and the ECH, potentially allowing a remote observer ...

CVE-2026-27017 uTLS has a Chrome Parrot Fingerprint Vulnerability due to GREASE ECH Cipher Suite Mismatch

uTLS is a fork of crypto/tls, created to customize ClientHello for fingerprinting resistance while still using it for the handshake. Versions 1.6.0 through 1.8.0 contain a fingerprint mismatch with Chrome when using GREASE ECH, related to cipher suite selection. When Chrome selects the preferred...

CVE-2026-27017

CVE-2026-27017 affects the uTLS fork of crypto/tls ( Versions 1.6.0–1.8.0 ) with GREASE ECH, causing a fingerprint mismatch with Chrome due to inconsistent cipher-suite selection between the outer ClientHello and ECH. Specifically, uTLS hardcodes AES for the outer cipher suite while randomly sele...

CVE-2026-27017

uTLS is a fork of crypto/tls, created to customize ClientHello for fingerprinting resistance while still using it for the handshake. Versions 1.6.0 through 1.8.0 contain a fingerprint mismatch with Chrome when using GREASE ECH, related to cipher suite selection. When Chrome selects the preferred...