Lucene search
+L

11078 matches found

RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
added 2026/04/20 7:23 p.m.20 views

CVE-2026-32690

Secrets in Variables saved as JSON dictionaries were not properly redacted - in case thee variables were retrieved by the user the secrets stored as nested fields were not masked. If you do not store variables with sensitive values in JSON form, you are not affected. Otherwise please upgrade to...

3.7CVSS5.8AI score0.00421EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
added 2026/04/20 7:23 p.m.13 views

CVE-2026-40476

graphql-go is a Go implementation of GraphQL. In versions 15.31.4 and below, the OverlappingFieldsCanBeMerged validation rule performs On² pairwise comparisons of fields sharing the same response name. An attacker can send a query with thousands of repeated identical fields, causing excessive CPU...

7.5CVSS5.8AI score0.00485EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
NVD
NVD
added 2026/04/20 7:16 p.m.9 views

CVE-2026-6248

The wpForo Forum plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Deletion in versions up to and including 3.0.5. This is due to two compounding flaws: the Members::update method does not validate or restrict the value of file-type custom profile fields, allowing authenticated users to store ...

8.1CVSS0.00593EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2026/04/20 6:31 p.m.40 views

CVE-2026-6248 wpForo Forum <= 3.0.5 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Arbitrary File Deletion via Custom Profile Field File Path

The wpForo Forum plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Deletion in versions up to and including 3.0.5. This is due to two compounding flaws: the Members::update method does not validate or restrict the value of file-type custom profile fields, allowing authenticated users to store ...

8.1CVSS0.00593EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
CVE
CVE
added 2026/04/20 6:31 p.m.25 views

CVE-2026-6248

The CVE-2026-6248 entry concerns the wpForo Forum plugin for WordPress (versions up to 3.0.5) and describes an Arbitrary File Deletion vulnerability. Root cause: two flaws allow an authenticated user with subscriber-level access to delete arbitrary server files via a crafted file-type custom prof...

8.1CVSS6.6AI score0.00593EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
ATTACKERKB
ATTACKERKB
added 2026/04/20 6:31 p.m.9 views

CVE-2026-6248

The wpForo Forum plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Deletion in versions up to and including 3.0.5. This is due to two compounding flaws: the Members::update method does not validate or restrict the value of file-type custom profile fields, allowing authenticated users to store ...

8.1CVSS6.6AI score0.00593EPSS
SaveExploits0References6
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
added 2026/04/20 6:31 p.m.6 views

CVE-2026-6248 wpForo Forum <= 3.0.5 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Arbitrary File Deletion via Custom Profile Field File Path

The wpForo Forum plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Deletion in versions up to and including 3.0.5. This is due to two compounding flaws: the Members::update method does not validate or restrict the value of file-type custom profile fields, allowing authenticated users to store ...

8.1CVSS6.6AI score0.00593EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
OSV
OSV
added 2026/04/20 4:07 p.m.15 views

CLSA-2026-1776701249 libssh: Fix of CVE-2026-0968

CVE-2026-0968: sanitize input handling in sftpparselongname to prevent OOB read when processing malformed SFTP longname fields, add unit tests...

3.1CVSS5.8AI score0.00442EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Patchstack
Patchstack
added 2026/04/20 3:49 p.m.18 views

WordPress Advanced Product Fields (Product Addons) for WooCommerce plugin <= 1.6.19 - PHP Object Injection vulnerability

PHP Object Injection vulnerability discovered by daroo in WordPress Plugin Advanced Product Fields Product Addons for WooCommerce versions = 1.6.19...

5.8AI score0.00446EPSS
SaveExploits0Affected Software1
GithubExploit
GithubExploit
added 2026/04/20 2:07 p.m.126 views

Exploit for CVE-2025-68999

CVE-2025-68999 Happy Addons for Elementor = 3.20.4 —...

8.5CVSS5.9AI score0.00263EPSS
SaveExploits2
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
added 2026/04/20 12:00 a.m.18 views

PT-2026-33866

OpenClaw before 2026.3.28 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the chat.send gateway method where ACP-only provenance fields are gated by self-declared client metadata from WebSocket handshake rather than verified authorization state. Authenticated operator clients can spoof ACP...

7.1CVSS5.8AI score0.00203EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
added 2026/04/20 12:00 a.m.15 views

PT-2026-33825

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions wpForo Forum versions prior to 3.0.6 Description The plugin is subject to arbitrary file deletion. This occurs because the Members::update method fails to validate or restrict values for file-type custom profile fields, enabling authenticated...

8.1CVSS6.4AI score0.00593EPSS
SaveExploits0References8
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2026/04/20 12:00 a.m.43 views

CVE-2026-29649

NEMU contains an implementation flaw in its RISC-V Hypervisor CSR handling where henvcfg7:4 CBIE/CBCFE/CBZE-related fields is incorrectly masked/updated based on menvcfg7:4, so a machine-mode write to menvcfg can implicitly modify the hypervisor's environment configuration. This can lead to...

0.00448EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
EUVD
EUVD
added 2026/04/18 4:18 p.m.39 views

EUVD-2026-23678

protobufjs compiles protobuf definitions into JavaScript JS functions. In versions prior to 8.0.1 and 7.5.5, attackers can inject arbitrary code in the "type" fields of protobuf definitions, which will then execute during object decoding using that definition. Versions 8.0.1 and 7.5.5 patch the...

9.4CVSS6AI score0.00745EPSS
SaveExploits2References5
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
added 2026/04/18 4:18 p.m.6 views

CVE-2026-41242 protobufjs has an arbitrary code execution issue

protobufjs compiles protobuf definitions into JavaScript JS functions. In versions prior to 8.0.1 and 7.5.5, attackers can inject arbitrary code in the "type" fields of protobuf definitions, which will then execute during object decoding using that definition. Versions 8.0.1 and 7.5.5 patch the...

9.4CVSS6AI score0.00745EPSS
SaveExploits2References5
OSV
OSV
added 2026/04/18 4:18 p.m.7 views

CVE-2026-41242 protobufjs has an arbitrary code execution issue

protobufjs compiles protobuf definitions into JavaScript JS functions. In versions prior to 8.0.1 and 7.5.5, attackers can inject arbitrary code in the "type" fields of protobuf definitions, which will then execute during object decoding using that definition. Versions 8.0.1 and 7.5.5 patch the...

9.4CVSS7.2AI score
SaveExploits0References14
Github Security Blog
Github Security Blog
added 2026/04/18 9:30 a.m.21 views

Apache Airflow Exposes Secrets in Variables Saved as JSON Dictionaries

Secrets in Variables saved as JSON dictionaries were not properly redacted - in case the variables were retrieved by the user the secrets stored as nested fields were not masked. If developers do not store variables with sensitive values in JSON form, their projects are not affected. Otherwise...

3.7CVSS5.7AI score0.00421EPSS
SaveExploits0References6Affected Software2
OSV
OSV
added 2026/04/18 7:16 a.m.15 views

PYSEC-2026-19

Secrets in Variables saved as JSON dictionaries were not properly redacted - in case thee variables were retrieved by the user the secrets stored as nested fields were not masked. If you do not store variables with sensitive values in JSON form, you are not affected. Otherwise please upgrade to...

3.7CVSS5.8AI score0.00421EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
EUVD
EUVD
added 2026/04/18 6:22 a.m.10 views

EUVD-2026-23666

Secrets in Variables saved as JSON dictionaries were not properly redacted - in case thee variables were retrieved by the user the secrets stored as nested fields were not masked. If you do not store variables with sensitive values in JSON form, you are not affected. Otherwise please upgrade to...

5.8AI score0.00421EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
ATTACKERKB
ATTACKERKB
added 2026/04/18 6:22 a.m.9 views

CVE-2026-32690

Secrets in Variables saved as JSON dictionaries were not properly redacted - in case thee variables were retrieved by the user the secrets stored as nested fields were not masked. If you do not store variables with sensitive values in JSON form, you are not affected. Otherwise please upgrade to...

5.8AI score0.00421EPSS
SaveExploits0References3Affected Software1
Rows per page
Query Builder