8558 matches found
PT-2026-54417
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Google Chrome versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 Description An inappropriate implementation in Extensions allows a remote attacker who has compromised the renderer process to perform UI spoofing using a crafted HTML page. UI spoofing is a...
PT-2026-54275
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Google Chrome versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 Description Insufficient validation of untrusted input within the Extensions component allows an attacker to perform UI spoofing. This occurs when a user is convinced to install a specially crafted...
PT-2026-54233
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Google Chrome versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 Description Incorrect security UI in Extensions allows an attacker to inject arbitrary scripts or HTML via a crafted HTML page. This occurs when a user is convinced to install a malicious extension...
PT-2026-54328
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Google Chrome versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 Description Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions allows a remote attacker who has compromised the renderer process to leak cross-origin data through a crafted HTML page. Recommendations...
PT-2026-54165
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Google Chrome versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 Description A use after free issue exists within the Extensions component. This flaw allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox by inducing the user to visit a specially...
PT-2026-54322
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Google Chrome versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 Description Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions allows an attacker to bypass the content security policy if a user is convinced to install a malicious extension. This is achieved through ...
PT-2026-54273
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Google Chrome on Android versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 Description Incorrect security UI in Extensions allows a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page if a user is convinced to engage in specific UI gestures. UI...
PT-2026-54221
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Google Chrome on Linux versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 Description Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions allows an attacker to perform UI spoofing through a crafted Chrome Extension, provided they can convince a user to install the...
PT-2026-54224
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Google Chrome versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 Description Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions allows an attacker to perform UI spoofing through a crafted Chrome Extension if a user is convinced to install the malicious extension...
PT-2026-54168
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Google Chrome versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 Description Insufficient validation of untrusted input within the Extensions component allows a remote attacker who has already compromised the renderer process to achieve privilege escalation. Thi...
PT-2026-54101
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Google Chrome versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 Description Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions allows a remote attacker who has compromised the renderer process to perform privilege escalation through a crafted HTML page...
PT-2026-54196
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Google Chrome versions prior to 150.0.7871.47 Description Insufficient policy enforcement in Extensions allows a remote attacker who has compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation by using a crafted HTML page. Site isolation is ...
Microsoft Removes 119 Edge Extensions That Hid Malware in Images and Fonts
Microsoft has shut down a long-running malicious extension operation on the Edge Add-ons store that hid its payloads inside ordinary image and font files, then woke up days after install to steal credentials and run ad fraud. The company calls it StegoAd, a mash-up of steganography and adware, an...
OPENSUSE-SU-2026:21163-1 Security update for yt-dlp
This update for yt-dlp fixes the following issues: Changes in yt-dlp: - Update to version 2026.06.09 Fixed CVE-2026-50019: File Downloader cookie leak with curl Fixed CVE-2026-50023: Dangerous file type creation via insufficient filename sanitization Fixed CVE-2026-50574: Arbitrary code execution...
About the security content of Safari 26.5.2
About the security content of Safari 26.5.2 This update delivers security fixes that were first made available in the macOS Tahoe 26.6 beta. This document describes the security content of Safari 26.5.2. About Apple security updates For our customers' protection, Apple doesn't disclose, discuss, ...
The vulnerability of the BIND DNS-Sec DNS server’s verification module allows a attacker to cause a service failure.
The vulnerability of the BIND DNS-server’s DNSSEC verification module lies in the lack of checks on input data for cyclic operations. Exploiting this vulnerability allows a malicious actor to cause service failures...
HPESBHF05019 rev.1 - Certain HPE SimpliVity Servers Using Certain Intel Processors, INTEL-SA-01397, 2026.1 IPU, Intel Trust Domain Extensions (Intel TDX) module Advisory, Multiple Vulnerabilities
Potential Security Impact: Local: Denial of Service DoS, Disclosure of Information, Escalation of Privilege SUPPORTED SOFTWARE VERSIONS: ONLY impacted versions are listed. HPE SimpliVity 380 Gen11 - Prior to SimpliVity Gen11 Support Pack SVTSP 2026-0605 CVSS Scores: | CVE | CVSS Vector | Base Sco...
[SECURITY] Fedora 43 Update: ldns-1.9.2-1.fc43
ldns is a library with the aim to simplify DNS programming in C. All low-level DNS/DNSSEC operations are supported. We also define a higher level API which allows a programmer to for instance create or sign packets...
EUVD-2026-31395
golang.org/x/crypto/ssh: FIDO/U2F security key physical presence check can be bypassed...
golang.org/x/crypto: FIDO/U2F security key physical presence check can be bypassed
The Verify method for FIDO/U2F security key types [email protected], [email protected] did not check the User Presence flag. Signatures generated without physical touch were accepted, allowing unattended use of a hardware security key. To restore the previous behavior,...