Lucene search
+L

4528 matches found

Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2018/06/25 11:00 a.m.27 views

CVE-2018-12083

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GOAL Bonanza GOAL, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

7.5AI score0.0089EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
CVE
CVE
added 2018/06/25 11:00 a.m.47 views

CVE-2018-12078

The CVE-2018-12078 entry describes a vulnerability in the mintToken function of PolyAI (AI), an ERC20 smart contract, where there is no period constraint. This allows the owner to arbitrarily increase the total supply, enabling profit through dilution. The provided documents do not include exploi...

7.5CVSS7.5AI score0.0089EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
CVE
CVE
added 2018/06/25 11:00 a.m.64 views

CVE-2018-12068

The CVE-2018-12068 issue concerns a math overflow in the sell() function of the Target Coin (TGT) ERC20 contract. The vulnerability arises from overflow in multiplying the argument amount by a manipulable sellPrice, enabling a potential trap (tradeTrap) that could cause financial damage to the se...

7.5CVSS7.5AI score0.0089EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
CVE
CVE
added 2018/06/25 11:00 a.m.43 views

CVE-2018-12062

SwftCoin (SWFTC), an ERC20 token, has a tradeTrap vulnerability in its sell function. The root cause is a multiplication overflow involving the argument amount and a manipulable sellPrice, enabling an attacker to cause financial damage to the seller. The issue is documented across multiple source...

7.5CVSS7.5AI score0.0089EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2018/06/25 11:00 a.m.37 views

CVE-2018-12082

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Fujinto NTO, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

7.5AI score0.0089EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2018/06/25 11:00 a.m.27 views

CVE-2018-12081

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin TGT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

7.5AI score0.0089EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
CVE
CVE
added 2018/06/25 11:00 a.m.43 views

CVE-2018-12081

CVE-2018-12081 affects the Target Coin (TGT) ERC20 token. The mintToken function has no period constraint, allowing the owner to arbitrarily increase total supply, enabling profit via inflation of assets. The vulnerability is defined in the NVD description and corroborated by multiple feeds; no e...

7.5CVSS7.5AI score0.0089EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
CVE
CVE
added 2018/06/25 11:00 a.m.54 views

CVE-2018-12080

The CVE describes a vulnerability in the Internet Node Token (INT) ERC20 contract where the mintToken function has no period constraint. This allows the owner to arbitrarily increase total supply, enabling potential profit manipulation. Documents confirm the affected component is the mintToken fu...

7.5CVSS7.5AI score0.0089EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2018/06/25 11:00 a.m.33 views

CVE-2018-12079

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

7.5AI score0.0089EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2018/06/25 11:00 a.m.32 views

CVE-2018-12084

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BitAsean BAS, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

7.5AI score0.0089EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
CVE
CVE
added 2018/06/25 11:00 a.m.58 views

CVE-2018-12079

CVE-2018-12079 affects Substratum (SUB) ERC20 token contracts. The mintToken function lacks a period constraint, allowing the owner to arbitrarily increase total supply (tradeTrap), enabling potential profit extraction. Documented impact indicates ability to inflate supply without explicit period...

7.5CVSS7.5AI score0.0089EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
CVE
CVE
added 2018/06/25 11:00 a.m.51 views

CVE-2018-12084

The CVE-2018-12084 case concerns BitAsean (BAS), a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token. The vulnerability resides in the smart-contract mintToken function, which has no period/expiration constraint, enabling the owner to arbitrarily inflate the total supply and profit. Documents confirm the issue as th...

7.5CVSS7.5AI score0.0089EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
CVE
CVE
added 2018/06/25 11:00 a.m.42 views

CVE-2018-12083

The CVE-2018-12083 entry concerns GOAL Bonanza (GOAL), an Ethereum ERC20 token whose smart-contract mintToken function has no period constraint, enabling the owner to arbitrarily increase total supply. This minting oversight creates a supply manipulation risk described as the tradeTrap. Affected ...

7.5CVSS7.5AI score0.0089EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2018/06/25 11:00 a.m.35 views

CVE-2018-12078

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PolyAI AI, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...

7.5AI score0.0089EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
CVE
CVE
added 2018/06/25 11:00 a.m.58 views

CVE-2018-11446

CVE-2018-11446 describes a tradeTrap in the Gold Reward (GRX) ERC20 contract where the buy() path multiplies amount by buyPrice without SafeMath, enabling an overflow that can trap funds. The owner can set buyPrice via setPrices(), potentially manipulating prices and enabling arbitrage-like explo...

7.5CVSS7.5AI score0.0089EPSS
SaveExploits1References1Affected Software1
NVD
NVD
added 2018/06/25 10:29 a.m.29 views

CVE-2018-12703

The approveAndCallcode function of a smart contract implementation for Block 18 18T, an tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows attackers to steal assets e.g., transfer the contract's balances into their account because the callcode i.e., spender.callextraData is not verified, aka the "evilReflex"...

7.5CVSS7.4AI score0.01094EPSS
SaveExploits2References2
Prion
Prion
added 2018/06/25 10:29 a.m.19 views

Design/Logic Flaw

The approveAndCallcode function of a smart contract implementation for Block 18 18T, an tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows attackers to steal assets e.g., transfer the contract's balances into their account because the callcode i.e., spender.callextraData is not verified, aka the "evilReflex"...

5CVSS7.4AI score0.01094EPSS
SaveExploits2References2
Prion
Prion
added 2018/06/25 10:29 a.m.18 views

Design/Logic Flaw

The approveAndCallcode function of a smart contract implementation for Globalvillage ecosystem GVE, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows attackers to steal assets e.g., transfer the contract's balances into their account because the callcode i.e., spender.callextraData is not verified, aka the...

5CVSS7.4AI score0.01094EPSS
SaveExploits2References2
CVE
CVE
added 2018/06/25 10:00 a.m.57 views

CVE-2018-12703

The CVE-2018-12703 vulnerability affects the approveAndCallcode flow in Block 18 (18T) ERC20 contracts. The issue is that _spender.call(_extraData) is not verified, enabling an attacker to hijack the callback and trigger arbitrary contract calls from the vulnerable contract. According to the Seeb...

7.5CVSS7.4AI score0.01094EPSS
SaveExploits2References2Affected Software1
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2018/06/25 10:00 a.m.37 views

CVE-2018-12702

The approveAndCallcode function of a smart contract implementation for Globalvillage ecosystem GVE, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows attackers to steal assets e.g., transfer the contract's balances into their account because the callcode i.e., spender.callextraData is not verified, aka the...

7.5AI score0.01094EPSS
SaveExploits2References2
Rows per page
Query Builder