4516 matches found
CVE-2018-13564
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GATcoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13772
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for TheFlashToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13627
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MyOffer, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13490
CVE-2018-13490 concerns the mintToken function of a FILM Ethereum token smart contract. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Impact stated: the owner can arbitrarily inflate balances, enabling manipulation of...
CVE-2018-13578
The CVE-2018-13578 entry concerns a GalaxyCoin Ethereum token smart contract where the mintToken function suffers an integer overflow, allowing the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This is the explicit vulnerability described in the connected NVD entry: affected com...
CVE-2018-13704
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for eddToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13676
The CVE concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementing the Orderbook Presale Token (OBP). The documented issue is an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to a chosen value. The available sources describe the vulnerable compone...
CVE-2018-13547
The CVE-2018-13547 entry concerns Providence Casino Token (ProvidenceCasinoToken) on Ethereum, where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Public sources in connected documents (CNVD/CNVD-2020-22842 and ...
CVE-2018-13731
CVE-2018-13731 concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract for the Ethereum token TokenMACHU. The vulnerability is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The description and linked sources indicate the impact is on balances cont...
CVE-2018-13663
The CVE-2018-13663 entry refers to BSCToken’s mintToken function, where an integer overflow allows the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance. The affected component is the smart contract implementation of BSCToken on Ethereum; the vulnerability’s root cause is an integer overflow i...
CVE-2018-13656
CVE-2018-13656 affects a smart contract for Sample Token (STK) with Contract Name cashBackMintable. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. This results in potential integrity impact (HIGH per CVSSv3)...
CVE-2018-13738
The CVE-2018-13738 issue concerns the PELOCoinToken Ethereum token. The mintToken function has an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Root cause: overflow in balance assignment within mintToken. Impact: owner-controlled balances can be...
CVE-2018-13740
CVE-2018-13740 concerns the OneChain Ethereum token smart contract. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Documents confirm the affected component is the mintToken logic in OneChain’s contract; no vendor/vers...
CVE-2018-13622
The CVE-2018-13622 entry describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ObjectToken (OBJ), an Ethereum token. The overflow allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, enabling potential manipulation of token balances. ...
CVE-2018-13552
The CVE-2018-13552 entry corresponds to Trabet_Coin_PreICO, where the mintToken function of the Ethereum token’s smart contract contains an integer overflow. This overflow allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Connected CNVD entry (Trabet_Coin_PreICO Integer O...
CVE-2018-13771
The CVE-2018-13771 entry concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract for ExacoreContract (an Ethereum token). The flaw is an integer overflow in mintToken that enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This description is supported by NVD references; no e...
CVE-2018-13504
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MMCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13602
The mint function of a smart contract implementation for MiningToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13770
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for UltimateCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13730
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for HEY, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...