CVE-2018-13543

The CVE-2018-13543 entry concerns GemstoneToken, an Ethereum token implemented as a smart contract. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the stated vulnerability and impact. The provided connec...

CVE-2018-13567

The CVE-2018-13567 entry describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of a smart-contract implementation for SDR, an Ethereum token. The underlying issue allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, implying a balance manipulation vulnerability. The connec...

CVE-2018-13473

CVE-2018-13473 affects the ohni_2 (OHNI) Ethereum token. The mintToken function in OHNI’s smart contract has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Connected CNVD entry confirms this root cause and impact as an overflow vulnerability in...

CVE-2018-13678

CVE-2018-13678 concerns a vulnerability in the Lottery Ethereum token contract. The mintToken function has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The root cause and impact are described in the sources; however, the connected documents d...

CVE-2018-13465

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PaulyCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13663

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BSCToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13531

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MaxHouse, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13513

CVE-2018-13513 concerns Ubiou’s Ethereum token smart contract where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow, allowing the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The issue is described consistently across sources (CNVD-2018-13186, NVD/CVE-2018-13513, CNVD varia...

CVE-2018-13713

CVE-2018-13713 concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Tradesman, an Ethereum token, where an integer overflow allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The description and linked sources confirm the vulnerability class (integer...

CVE-2018-13760

CVE-2018-13760 concerns MoneyChainNet (MCN) as an Ethereum token with a vulnerable mintToken function in its smart contract. The root cause is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. Documents confirm that this could enable ownershi...

CVE-2018-13652

CVE-2018-13652 affects TheGoDigital’s Ethereum token smart contract. The mintToken function has an integer overflow, enabling the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. Public disclosures from NVD summarize the vulnerability as an overflow in mintToken that grants ow...

CVE-2018-13555

CVE-2018-13555 concerns a JaxBox smart contract where the mintToken function has an integer overflow, allowing the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is documented across multiple sources (NVD/CNVD/PRION) as a token balance manipulation vulnerability in the mintT...

CVE-2018-13485

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BitcoinAgileToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13741

The CVE concerns ABLGenesisToken, an Ethereum ERC20-like token. The mintToken function has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is described across multiple sources (NVD/CNVD entries) as the root cause and impact. The documents d...

CVE-2018-13738

The CVE-2018-13738 issue concerns the PELOCoinToken Ethereum token. The mintToken function has an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Root cause: overflow in balance assignment within mintToken. Impact: owner-controlled balances can be...

CVE-2018-13555

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for JaxBox, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13660

The CVE-2018-13660 issue affects the BillionRewardsToken Ethereum token. The vulnerability is a flaw in the contract’s mint function that allows an attacker with the contract owner role to exploit an integer overflow and set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This directly impacts the toke...

CVE-2018-13472

The mint function of a smart contract implementation for CloutToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13626

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for SemainToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13776

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for AppleToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...