CVE-2018-13648

The CVE-2018-13648 entry concerns the mintToken function of a BGC Ethereum token smart contract. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken, enabling the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. Documents confirm the component and vulnerability but do not provide ex...

CVE-2018-13568

The CVE-2018-13568 entry concerns a smart contract (MktCoin) with a mintToken function that contains an integer overflow. The vulnerability allows the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to any value, revealing a control over user balances via this overflow. The provided sourc...

CVE-2018-13780

The CVE-2018-13780 entry concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ESH (an Ethereum token). The vulnerability is an integer overflow in mintToken that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The provided connected sources confir...

CVE-2018-13605

The CVE-2018-13605 entry concerns the mintToken function in Extreme Token (Extreme Coin) Ethereum contract (ExtremeToken). The root cause is an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance to a chosen value. Documents consistently describe this vulnerabil...

CVE-2018-13725

CVE-2018-13725 concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GlobalSuperGameToken (Ethereum token). The issue is an integer overflow in mintToken that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. Affected component: smart contract token ...

CVE-2018-13658

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for TheGoDgital, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13688

The CVE-2018-13688 entry pertains to a vulnerability in the MallToken Ethereum token where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow. This overflow enables the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to an attacker-controlled value, constituting a serious integrity impac...

CVE-2018-13661

The CVE concerns the APP Ethereum token: its smart contract mintToken has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the stated root cause and affects balance integrity. The documents do not specify exact affected versions or remedi...

CVE-2018-13646

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Datiac, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13472

The mint function of a smart contract implementation for CloutToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13507

The CVE concerns the mintToken function in the SLCAdvancedToken smart contract. A integer overflow vulnerability allows the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance to a chosen value. The affected component is the mintToken implementation within the Ethereum token contract, with the u...

CVE-2018-13723

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for SERVVIZIOToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13777

The CVE-2018-13777 entry concerns a flaw in the mintToken function of a RRToken Ethereum smart contract. The vulnerability is an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This is the concrete impact described across sources (NVD/NVD-derived record...

CVE-2018-13573

CVE-2018-13573 refers to the mintToken function in a TripPay Ethereum token smart contract. The vulnerability is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The connected documents reiterate that the owner can affect balances (no further det...

CVE-2018-13673

The CVE concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GoldTokenERC20 (Ethereum token). The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken that allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. Impact, as described in the sources, is that balance m...

CVE-2018-13607

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ResidualShare, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13666

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for EristicaICO, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13629

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CrimsonShilling, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13532

CVE-2018-13532 concerns the Mindexcoin Ethereum token. The issue is in the contract’s mintToken function, where an integer overflow allows the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance. Public sources in connected documents confirm the vulnerability and its impact: an attacker could in...

CVE-2018-13534

CVE-2018-13534 affects SpeedCashLite (SCSL) Ethereum token. The mintToken function in the smart contract has an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to any value. This is described consistently across multiple sources (e.g., CNVD-2018-13256 and...