Code injection

Besu is a Java-based Ethereum client. In versions newer than 22.1.3 and prior to 22.7.1, Besu is subject to an Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types. An error in 32 bit signed and unsigned types in the calculation of available gas in the CALL operations including DELEGATECALL results in...

Design/Logic Flaw

Frontier is an Ethereum compatibility layer for Substrate. Prior to commit d3beddc6911a559a3ecc9b3f08e153dbe37a8658, the worst case weight was always accounted as the block weight for all cases. In case of large EVM gas refunds, this can lead to block spamming attacks -- the adversary can constru...

CVE-2022-36025

Besu (Java-based Ethereum client) contains a numeric conversion bug in gas calculation for CALL/DELEGATECALL, affecting versions after 22.1.3 and before 22.7.1. The error in 32-bit signed/unsigned arithmetic can pass incorrect gas to called contracts and return gas, potentially causing a differin...

CVE-2022-36025 Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types in Besu Ethereum Client

Besu is a Java-based Ethereum client. In versions newer than 22.1.3 and prior to 22.7.1, Besu is subject to an Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types. An error in 32 bit signed and unsigned types in the calculation of available gas in the CALL operations including DELEGATECALL results in...

CVE-2022-36025 Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types in Besu Ethereum Client

Besu is a Java-based Ethereum client. In versions newer than 22.1.3 and prior to 22.7.1, Besu is subject to an Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types. An error in 32 bit signed and unsigned types in the calculation of available gas in the CALL operations including DELEGATECALL results in...

CVE-2022-36025 Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types in Besu Ethereum Client

Besu is a Java-based Ethereum client. In versions newer than 22.1.3 and prior to 22.7.1, Besu is subject to an Incorrect Conversion between Numeric Types. An error in 32 bit signed and unsigned types in the calculation of available gas in the CALL operations including DELEGATECALL results in...

CVE-2022-39242

CVE-2022-39242 affects Frontier, an Ethereum compatibility layer for Substrate. The root cause is that the worst-case weight was always counted as the block weight in all cases, allowing large EVM gas refunds to enable block spamming and inflate chain gas prices. The impact is limited: attack cos...

CVE-2022-39242 Incorrect Calculation in Frontier leads to inflated Ethereum chain gas prices

Frontier is an Ethereum compatibility layer for Substrate. Prior to commit d3beddc6911a559a3ecc9b3f08e153dbe37a8658, the worst case weight was always accounted as the block weight for all cases. In case of large EVM gas refunds, this can lead to block spamming attacks -- the adversary can constru...

CVE-2022-39242 Incorrect Calculation in Frontier leads to inflated Ethereum chain gas prices

Frontier is an Ethereum compatibility layer for Substrate. Prior to commit d3beddc6911a559a3ecc9b3f08e153dbe37a8658, the worst case weight was always accounted as the block weight for all cases. In case of large EVM gas refunds, this can lead to block spamming attacks -- the adversary can constru...

CVE-2022-39242 Incorrect Calculation in Frontier leads to inflated Ethereum chain gas prices

Frontier is an Ethereum compatibility layer for Substrate. Prior to commit d3beddc6911a559a3ecc9b3f08e153dbe37a8658, the worst case weight was always accounted as the block weight for all cases. In case of large EVM gas refunds, this can lead to block spamming attacks -- the adversary can constru...

GHSA-4456-W38R-M53X Besu VM vulnerable to gas allocation error in CALL operations

Impact An error in 32 bit signed and unsigned types in the calculation of available gas in the CALL operations including DELEGATECALL results in incorrect gas being passed into called contracts and incorrect gas being returned after call execution. Where the amount of gas makes a difference in th...

Besu VM vulnerable to gas allocation error in CALL operations

Impact An error in 32 bit signed and unsigned types in the calculation of available gas in the CALL operations including DELEGATECALL results in incorrect gas being passed into called contracts and incorrect gas being returned after call execution. Where the amount of gas makes a difference in th...

Evoh NFT EvohClaimable 安全漏洞

Evoh NFT EvohClaimable is a public smart contract running in the ethereum blockchain by eVoh Personal Developers. Evoh NFT EvohClaimable suffers from a security vulnerability. A remote attacker exploiting this vulnerability could perform fraudulent NFT transmissions...

The vulnerability of the Geth client library of the Ethereum programming language GO in Go Ethereum allows a hacker to trigger a service failure.

The vulnerability of the Geth client library for the Ethereum protocol, written in the Go programming language, is related to the occurrence of interpretation conflicts. Exploiting this vulnerability can allow a malicious actor to cause service failures...

FIRST DEPOSITOR CAN BREAK MINTING OF SHARES

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The attack vector and impact is the same as TOB-YEARN-003, where users may not receive shares in exchange for their deposits if the total asset amount has been manipulated through a large “donation”. In the SemiFungibleVault.sol file, the allocation of...

[H3] Deposit ETH is not working as expected

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Deposit ETH deposit to msg.sender but not to receiver as stated in docs Proof of Concept Function depositETH at Vault.sol is not working as described in docs. @param receiver address of the receiver of the shares provided by this function, that represent...

Problems with PegOracle

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There are at least a few problems with the PegOracle. I am grouping them into one submission because some of them are not that significant but the last one I believe deserves a higher severity. 1. Function latestRoundData queries getOracle2Price but...

CVE-2022-40769

profanity through 1.60 has only four billion possible RNG initializations. Thus, attackers can recover private keys from Ethereum vanity addresses and steal cryptocurrency, as exploited in the wild in June 2022...

CVE-2022-40769

profanity through 1.60 has only four billion possible RNG initializations. Thus, attackers can recover private keys from Ethereum vanity addresses and steal cryptocurrency, as exploited in the wild in June 2022...

Design/Logic Flaw

profanity through 1.60 has only four billion possible RNG initializations. Thus, attackers can recover private keys from Ethereum vanity addresses and steal cryptocurrency, as exploited in the wild in June 2022...