1209 matches found
CVE-2018-13696
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for RedTicket, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13683
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for exsulcoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13579
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ForeverCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13526
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for WangWangToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13523
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for SmartPayment, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13643
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GCRTokenERC20, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13638
The CVE-2018-13638 issue affects Bitpark’s Ethereum token contract. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value, exposing potential balance manipulation. The root cause is an overflow in balance assignment; impact i...
CVE-2018-13647
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for TrueGoldCoinToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13647
The CVE-2018-13647 entry concerns a vulnerability in a TrueGoldCoinToken smart contract. The affected component is the mintToken function of the token’s Ethereum implementation. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken, which enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance...
CVE-2018-13636
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for TurdCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13481
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for TRIUM, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13515
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for aman, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13562
The CVE-2018-13562 entry concerns BMVCoin, an Ethereum token smart contract. The mintToken function has an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the stated underlying vulnerability and impact in multiple sources (NVD entry, Prion...
CVE-2018-13777
The CVE-2018-13777 entry concerns a flaw in the mintToken function of a RRToken Ethereum smart contract. The vulnerability is an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This is the concrete impact described across sources (NVD/NVD-derived record...
CVE-2018-13631
The CVE-2018-13631 entry concerns a vulnerability in the doccoin Ethereum token smart contract where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow. This overflow enables the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance to a chosen value, representing an integrity risk for balances i...
CVE-2018-13643
The CVE-2018-13643 issue affects the GCRTokenERC20 Ethereum token; its mintToken function has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is documented with CVSS metrics (2.0: 5.0 Medium, Network attack, no auth; 3.0: 7.5 High, Network,...
CVE-2018-13559
CVE-2018-13559 : In UTCT’s Ethereum token, the mintToken function contains an integer overflow in the smart contract, enabling the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This creates an integrity impact on balances and token accounting. The public documents do not provide...
CVE-2018-13534
CVE-2018-13534 affects SpeedCashLite (SCSL) Ethereum token. The mintToken function in the smart contract has an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to any value. This is described consistently across multiple sources (e.g., CNVD-2018-13256 and...
CVE-2018-13679
The CVE-2018-13679 issue affects the ZPEcoin smart contract: the mintToken function incurs an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The vulnerability is described as a mint overflow in the Ethereum token implementation, with no explicit ...
CVE-2018-13499
The CVE-2018-13499 entry concerns a vulnerability in a Crowdsale Ethereum token where the mintToken function is susceptible to an integer overflow. The underlying cause allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, representing a direct control of token balances by th...