CVE-2018-13077

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CTB, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13084

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Good Time Coin GTY, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13328

The transfer, transferFrom, and mint functions of a smart contract implementation for PFGc, an Ethereum token, have an integer overflow...

CVE-2019-15078

An issue was discovered in a smart contract implementation for AIRDROPX BORN through 2019-05-29, an Ethereum token. The name of the constructor has a typo wrong case: XBornID versus XBORNID that allows an attacker to change the owner of the contract and obtain cryptocurrency for free...

CVE-2018-13092

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Reimburse Token REIM, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13082

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MODI Token MODI, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13073

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ETHEREUMBLACK ETCBK, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13072

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Coffeecoin COFFEE, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-14087

An issue was discovered in a smart contract implementation for EUC EUC, an Ethereum token. The contract has an integer overflow. If the owner sets the value of buyPrice to a large number in setPrices then the "msg.value buyPrice" will cause an integer overflow in the fallback function...

CVE-2018-13089

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Universal Coin UCOIN, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13074

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for FIBToken FIB, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13071

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CCindex10 T10, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2021-34272

A security flaw in the 'owned' function of a smart contract implementation for RobotCoin RBTC, a tradeable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows attackers to hijack victim accounts and arbitrarily increase the digital supply of assets...

Ethereum token 安全漏洞

The Ethereum token is a digital currency of the Ether Ethereum community. The Ethereum token suffers from a security vulnerability that stems from an issue discovered in the function addMeByRC in the smart contract implementation of the Ethereum token RC, which allows an attacker to transfer an...

Ethereum token 输入验证错误漏洞

Ethereum token is a digital currency of the Ether Ethereum community. An input validation error vulnerability exists in Ethereum token, which stems from an integer overflow vulnerability in a function of Ethereum token...

Code injection

The sellTokenForLRC function in the vault protocol in the smart contract implementation for Loopring LRC, an Ethereum token, lacks access control for fee swapping and thus allows price manipulation...

CVE-2021-3006

The CVE-2021-3006 entry concerns the Seal Finance (Seal) Ethereum token. The breed function in its smart contract lacks access control, enabling price manipulation. Exploitation occurred in the wild during December 2020 and January 2021. The available documents confirm the root cause (unauthorize...

CVE-2021-3006

The breed function in the smart contract implementation for Farm in Seal Finance Seal, an Ethereum token, lacks access control and thus allows price manipulation, as exploited in the wild in December 2020 and January 2021...

Design/Logic Flaw

The deposit function in the smart contract implementation for Stable Yield Credit yCREDIT, an Ethereum token, has certain incorrect calculations. An attacker can obtain more yCREDIT tokens than they should...

CVE-2021-3004

The deposit function in the smart contract implementation for Stable Yield Credit yCREDIT, an Ethereum token, has certain incorrect calculations. An attacker can obtain more yCREDIT tokens than they should...