CVE-2023-0296

The Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers flaw CVE-2016-2183 was reported for the health checks port 9979 on etcd grpc-proxy component. Even though the CVE-2016-2183 has been fixed in the etcd components, to enable periodic health checks from kubelet, it was necessary to open up a new port...

Design/Logic Flaw

The Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers flaw CVE-2016-2183 was reported for the health checks port 9979 on etcd grpc-proxy component. Even though the CVE-2016-2183 has been fixed in the etcd components, to enable periodic health checks from kubelet, it was necessary to open up a new port...

Moderate: Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.12.0 bug fix and security update

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform release 4.12.0 is now available with updates to packages and images that fix several bugs and add enhancements. This release includes a security update for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4.12. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a...

CVE-2023-0296

The Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers flaw CVE-2016-2183 was reported for the health checks port 9979 on etcd grpc-proxy component. Even though the CVE-2016-2183 has been fixed in the etcd components, to enable periodic health checks from kubelet, it was necessary to open up a new port...

PT-2023-16151 · Red Hat · Openshift

‼ CVE-2023-0296 ‼ The Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers flaw CVE-2016-2183 was reported for the health checks port 9979 on etcd grpc-proxy component. Even though the CVE-2016-2183 has been fixed in the etcd components, to enable periodic health checks from kubelet, it was necessary to...

CVE-2023-0296

The Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers flaw CVE-2016-2183 was reported for the health checks port 9979 on etcd grpc-proxy component. Even though the CVE-2016-2183 has been fixed in the etcd components, to enable periodic health checks from kubelet, it was necessary to open up a new port...

CVE-2023-0296

Technical details for CVE-2023-0296 are not provided in the supplied documents. No affected products, root cause, or remediation specifics are present here. Monitor for updates in connected feeds to obtain concrete information.

CVE-2023-0296

The Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers CVE-2016-2183 was reported for the health checks port 9979 on the etcd grpc-proxy component. Even though the CVE-2016-2183 has been fixed in the etcd components, to enable periodic health checks from kubelet, it was necessary to open up a new port...

CVE-2021-4235 affecting package etcd 3.5.1-6

CVE-2021-4235 affecting package etcd 3.5.1-6. An upgraded version of the package is available that resolves this issue...

CVE-2022-3064 affecting package etcd 3.5.1-6

CVE-2022-3064 affecting package etcd 3.5.1-6. An upgraded version of the package is available that resolves this issue...

Exploit for Authentication Bypass by Spoofing in Apache Apisix

POCs Collected POCs CVE-2022-24112 To create a test...

Information Disclosure

etcd is vulnerable to information disclosure. The vulnerability is due to the CheckDirPermission function, the WAL log files are not properly validated in access permissions, allowing the attacker to gain access to sensitive information...

Denial Of Service (DoS)

github.com/etcd-io/etcd is vulnerable to denial of service. The vulnerability exists in multiple functions of discovery.go because the negative values can be passed as the cluster size which results in an index out-of-bound causing an application crash during service discovery...

etcd having a negative value for cluster node size results in an index out-of-bound panic during service discovery

Vulnerability type Data Validation Detail When an etcd instance attempts to perform service discovery, if a cluster size is provided as a negative value, the etcd instance will panic without recovery. References Find out more on this vulnerability in the security audit report For more information...

GHSA-9GP7-6833-WV89 etcd having a negative value for cluster node size results in an index out-of-bound panic during service discovery

Vulnerability type Data Validation Detail When an etcd instance attempts to perform service discovery, if a cluster size is provided as a negative value, the etcd instance will panic without recovery. References Find out more on this vulnerability in the security audit report For more information...

etcd user credentials are stored in WAL logs in plaintext

Vulnerability type Data Exposure Workarounds The etcd assumes that the on disk files are secure. The possible fixes have been provided, however, it is the responsibility of the etcd users to make sure that the etcd server WAL log files are secure. The etcd doesn't encrypt key/value data stored on...

GHSA-528J-9R78-WFFX etcd user credentials are stored in WAL logs in plaintext

Vulnerability type Data Exposure Workarounds The etcd assumes that the on disk files are secure. The possible fixes have been provided, however, it is the responsibility of the etcd users to make sure that the etcd server WAL log files are secure. The etcd doesn't encrypt key/value data stored on...

etcd has no minimum password length

Vulnerability type Access Control Workarounds The etcdctl and etcd API do not enforce a specific password length during user creation or user password update operations. It is the responsibility of the administrator to enforce these requirements. Detail etcd does not perform any password length...

GHSA-H8G9-6GVH-5MRC etcd vulnerable to TOCTOU of gateway endpoint authentication

Vulnerability type Authentication Workarounds Refer to the gateway documentation. The vulnerability was spotted due to unclear documentation of how the gateway handles endpoints validation. Detail The gateway only authenticates endpoints detected from DNS SRV records, and it only authenticates th...

GHSA-M332-53R6-2W93 etcd's WAL `ReadAll` method vulnerable to an entry with large index causing panic

Vulnerability type Data Validation Detail In the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime...