Buffer overflow

Buffer overflow in BL4 SMTP Server 0.1.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service crash or execute arbitrary code via a long argument to the 1 EHLO, 2 MAIL FROM, and 3 RCPT TO commands...

CVE-2005-1013

The SMTP service in MailEnable Enterprise 1.04 and earlier and Professional 1.54 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service server crash via an EHLO command with a Unicode string...

CVE-2005-1013

CVE-2005-1013 affects MailEnable Enterprise 1.04 and earlier and MailEnable Professional 1.54 and earlier. The issue is a denial-of-service via an EHLO command containing a Unicode string, which can crash the SMTP service. Connected documents corroborate a MailEnable SMTP DoS vector related to ma...

CVE-2005-1013: Undefined Security Weakness

The SMTP service in MailEnable Enterprise 1.04 and earlier and Professional 1.54 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service server crash via an EHLO command with a Unicode string...

CVE-2004-1638

CVE-2004-1638: MailCarrier 2.51 SMTP service contains a buffer overflow that can be triggered by sending an overly long EHLO command (and possibly HELO), enabling remote code execution. Public exploit references exist (e.g., Metasploit module for MailCarrier SMTP EHLO overflow) and multiple advis...

CVE-2004-1638

Buffer overflow in MailCarrier 2.51 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long 1 EHLO and possibly 2 HELO command...

CVE-2004-1638: Undefined Security Weakness

Buffer overflow in MailCarrier 2.51 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long 1 EHLO and possibly 2 HELO command...

CVE-2004-1638

Buffer overflow in MailCarrier 2.51 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long 1 EHLO and possibly 2 HELO command...

MS02-037: Microsoft Exchange EHLO Long Hostname Overflow

A security vulnerability results because of an unchecked buffer in the IMC code that generates the response to the EHLO protocol command. If the buffer were overrun with data it would result in either the failure of the IMC or could allow the attacker to run code in the security context of the IM...