8007 matches found
aleksis (>=2022.6.0.post0 <=2023.6.1), aleksis-app-alsijil (>=2.0.0 <=3.0.1) +96 more potentially affected by CVE-2025-65431 via django-allauth (>=0.24.1 <=65.12.1)
django-allauth PYPI version =0.24.1, =2022.6.0.post0, =2.0.0, =1.0.0, =2.0.0, =2.1.0, =2.0.0, =1.0.0.dev0, =0.1.0, =2.0.0, =2.0.0, =0.1.0, =2.0.0, =1.0.0, =0.1.1, =2.0.0.dev0, =2.0.0.dev2 and more Source cves: CVE-2025-65431 Source advisory: OSV:GHSA-8M3C-C723-H4P4...
EUVD-2025-203377
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. IdP: marking a user as isactive=False after having handed tokens for that user while the account was still active had no effect. Fixed the access/refresh tokens are now rejected...
GHSA-8M3C-C723-H4P4 django-allauth's Okta and NetIQ implementations used a mutable identifier for authorization decisions
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferredusername as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead...
django-allauth's Okta and NetIQ implementations used a mutable identifier for authorization decisions
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferredusername as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead...
GHSA-QHMC-3MVR-F2J4 django-allauth does not reject access tokens for inactive users
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. IdP: marking a user as isactive=False after having handed tokens for that user while the account was still active had no effect. Fixed the access/refresh tokens are now rejected...
django-allauth does not reject access tokens for inactive users
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. IdP: marking a user as isactive=False after having handed tokens for that user while the account was still active had no effect. Fixed the access/refresh tokens are now rejected...
Improper Certificate Validation
Overview django-allauth is an integrated set of Django applications addressing authentication, registration, account management as well as 3rd party social account authentication. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Certificate Validation via the preferredusername field...
django-daiquiri (>=1.3.0 <=1.3.1), django-jwt-allauth (>=1.0.3 <=1.2.0) +5 more potentially affected by CVE-2025-65431 via django-allauth (>=65.0.1 <=65.12.1)
django-allauth PYPI version =65.0.1, =1.3.0, =1.0.3, =0.3.8, =4.0.0, =2.0.0, =1.1.1, =1.1.2 Source cves: CVE-2025-65431 Source advisory: SNYK:PYTHON-DJANGOALLAUTH-14425069...
django-daiquiri (>=1.3.0 <=1.3.1), django-jwt-allauth (>=1.0.3 <=1.2.0) +5 more potentially affected by CVE-2025-65430 via django-allauth (>=65.0.1 <=65.12.1)
django-allauth PYPI version =65.0.1, =1.3.0, =1.0.3, =0.3.8, =4.0.0, =2.0.0, =1.1.1, =1.1.2 Source cves: CVE-2025-65430 Source advisory: SNYK:PYTHON-DJANGOALLAUTH-14425438...
Insufficient Session Expiration
Overview django-allauth is an integrated set of Django applications addressing authentication, registration, account management as well as 3rd party social account authentication. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Insufficient Session Expiration due to the improper handling of...
PYSEC-2025-111
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferredusername as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead...
CVE-2025-65431
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferredusername as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead...
aleksis (>=2022.6.0.post0 <=2023.6.1), aleksis-app-alsijil (>=2.0.0 <=3.0.1) +96 more potentially affected by CVE-2025-65430 via django-allauth (>=0.24.1 <=65.12.1)
django-allauth PYPI version =0.24.1, =2022.6.0.post0, =2.0.0, =1.0.0, =2.0.0, =2.1.0, =2.0.0, =1.0.0.dev0, =0.1.0, =2.0.0, =2.0.0, =0.1.0, =2.0.0, =1.0.0, =0.1.1, =2.0.0.dev0, =2.0.0.dev2 and more Source cves: CVE-2025-65430 Source advisory: OSV:PYSEC-2025-110...
CVE-2025-65430
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. IdP: marking a user as isactive=False after having handed tokens for that user while the account was still active had no effect. Fixed the access/refresh tokens are now rejected...
PYSEC-2025-110
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. IdP: marking a user as isactive=False after having handed tokens for that user while the account was still active had no effect. Fixed the access/refresh tokens are now rejected...
aleksis (>=2022.6.0.post0 <=2023.6.1), aleksis-app-alsijil (>=2.0.0 <=3.0.1) +96 more potentially affected by CVE-2025-65431 via django-allauth (>=0.24.1 <=65.12.1)
django-allauth PYPI version =0.24.1, =2022.6.0.post0, =2.0.0, =1.0.0, =2.0.0, =2.1.0, =2.0.0, =1.0.0.dev0, =0.1.0, =2.0.0, =2.0.0, =0.1.0, =2.0.0, =1.0.0, =0.1.1, =2.0.0.dev0, =2.0.0.dev2 and more Source cves: CVE-2025-65431 Source advisory: OSV:PYSEC-2025-111...
PYSEC-2025-111
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferredusername as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead...
CVE-2025-65431
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferredusername as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead...
PYSEC-2025-110
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. IdP: marking a user as isactive=False after having handed tokens for that user while the account was still active had no effect. Fixed the access/refresh tokens are now rejected...
CVE-2025-65430
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. IdP: marking a user as isactive=False after having handed tokens for that user while the account was still active had no effect. Fixed the access/refresh tokens are now rejected...