94248 matches found
CVE-2025-32750
Technical details are not publicly available in the provided documents. The CVE affects Dell PowerFlex Manager (≤4.6.2) with an Information Disclosure through Directory Listing; monitor Dell advisories for patches and updates.
CVE-2025-32750
Dell PowerFlex Manager, versions =4.6.2, contains an Exposure of Information Through Directory Listing vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information exposure...
EUVD-2025-209907
Dell PowerFlex Manager, versions =4.6.2, contains an Exposure of Information Through Directory Listing vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information exposure...
MAL-2026-4569 Malicious code in gator-client (npm)
--- -= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=- Source: amazon-inspector 1925735d02fb91f74a11718c3402ad0b10f551eecb8c6d88f02d475b3e0a799f On npm install via scripts.install: node index.js and on every require'gator-client', lib/core.js collects os.userInfo.username, os.hostname, and the...
Malicious code in gator-client (npm)
--- -= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=- Source: amazon-inspector 1925735d02fb91f74a11718c3402ad0b10f551eecb8c6d88f02d475b3e0a799f On npm install via scripts.install: node index.js and on every require'gator-client', lib/core.js collects os.userInfo.username, os.hostname, and the...
Malicious code in rendezvous-js (npm)
--- -= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=- Source: amazon-inspector 5b4a03eaa6b09e5b9e291dd450f58e49a639c3efd8fa952f5ac48f9aea04aba4 On npm install scripts.install runs node index.js and on require'rendezvous-js', lib/core.js collects os.userInfo.username, os.hostname, and the...
CVE-2026-3039
BIND servers that are configured to use TKEY-based authentication via GSS-API tokens are vulnerable to excessive memory consumption when receiving and processing maliciously-constructed packets. Typically these servers will be found in Active Directory integrated DNS deployments and/or...
ALPINE-CVE-2026-3039
BIND servers that are configured to use TKEY-based authentication via GSS-API tokens are vulnerable to excessive memory consumption when receiving and processing maliciously-constructed packets. Typically these servers will be found in Active Directory integrated DNS deployments and/or...
CVE-2026-3039
BIND servers that are configured to use TKEY-based authentication via GSS-API tokens are vulnerable to excessive memory consumption when receiving and processing maliciously-constructed packets. Typically these servers will be found in Active Directory integrated DNS deployments and/or...
MAL-2026-4495 Malicious code in banana-stand (npm)
--- -= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=- Source: amazon-inspector ab14273a518e66f357d229806e82cb2f4ce211cae4bc5de0f2d15eeab67fb720 On npm install, the package's install lifecycle hook runs node index.js, which loads lib/core.js. That module reads os.userInfo.username, os.hostname...
CVE-2026-3039
CVE-2026-3039 affects BIND 9.x when TKEY-based authentication via GSS-API tokens is used; the issue is a memory-exhaustion vulnerability triggered by malicious packets in Active Directory/Kerberos DNS setups. Affected versions span 9.0.0–9.16.50, 9.18.0–9.18.48, 9.20.0–9.20.22, 9.21.0–9.21.21, pl...
CVE-2026-3039
BIND servers that are configured to use TKEY-based authentication via GSS-API tokens are vulnerable to excessive memory consumption when receiving and processing maliciously-constructed packets. Typically these servers will be found in Active Directory integrated DNS deployments and/or...
CVE-2026-3039
BIND servers that are configured to use TKEY-based authentication via GSS-API tokens are vulnerable to excessive memory consumption when receiving and processing maliciously-constructed packets. Typically these servers will be found in Active Directory integrated DNS deployments and/or...
EUVD-2026-31103
BIND servers that are configured to use TKEY-based authentication via GSS-API tokens are vulnerable to excessive memory consumption when receiving and processing maliciously-constructed packets. Typically these servers will be found in Active Directory integrated DNS deployments and/or...
CVE-2026-9064
A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. The getldapmessagecontrolsext function in the LDAP server does not enforce an upper bound on the number of controls per LDAP message. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a specially crafted LDAP request containing hundreds of thousands of minimal controls...
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-9064
A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. The getldapmessagecontrolsext function in the LDAP server does not enforce an upper bound on the number of controls per LDAP message. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a specially crafted LDAP request containing hundreds of thousands of minimal controls...
CVE-2026-9064
A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. The getldapmessagecontrolsext function in the LDAP server does not enforce an upper bound on the number of controls per LDAP message. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a specially crafted LDAP request containing hundreds of thousands of minimal controls...
Malicious code in nolimit-x (npm)
--- -= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=- Source: amazon-inspector 92a244ab5171edadc3082bc97d5b0834c4cfe98f2e5b6437503a30a7c1ac38aa nolimit-x ships an entirely obfuscator.io-packed runtime 45 files under.ad/, including the x0.js entrypoint with no readable source, and...
MAL-2026-4621 Malicious code in nolimit-x (npm)
--- -= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=- Source: amazon-inspector 92a244ab5171edadc3082bc97d5b0834c4cfe98f2e5b6437503a30a7c1ac38aa nolimit-x ships an entirely obfuscator.io-packed runtime 45 files under.ad/, including the x0.js entrypoint with no readable source, and...
CVE-2026-9064 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: unbounded ldap controls count in get_ldapmessage_controls_ext() causes cpu and heap amplification (remote dos)
A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. The getldapmessagecontrolsext function in the LDAP server does not enforce an upper bound on the number of controls per LDAP message. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can send a specially crafted LDAP request containing hundreds of thousands of minimal controls...