11983 matches found
CVE-2024-40592
An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability CWE-347 in FortiClient MacOS version 7.4.0, version 7.2.4 and below, version 7.0.10 and below, version 6.4.10 and below may allow a local authenticated attacker to swap the installer with a malicious package via a race condition...
CVE-2024-46889
A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS All versions V1.0 SP2 Update 3. The affected application uses hard-coded cryptographic key material to obfuscate configuration files. This could allow an attacker to learn that cryptographic key material through reverse engineering of the applicati...
CVE-2024-46889
A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS All versions V1.0 SP2 Update 3. The affected application uses hard-coded cryptographic key material to obfuscate configuration files. This could allow an attacker to learn that cryptographic key material through reverse engineering of the applicati...
CVE-2024-46889
CVE-2024-46889 affects Siemens SINEC INS (all versions
CVE-2024-46889
A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS All versions V1.0 SP2 Update 3. The affected application uses hard-coded cryptographic key material to obfuscate configuration files. This could allow an attacker to learn that cryptographic key material through reverse engineering of the applicati...
Moderate: Red Hat Security Advisory: libgcrypt security update
An update for libgcrypt is now available for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9. Red Hat Product Security has rated this update as having a security impact of Moderate. A Common Vulnerability Scoring System CVSS base score, which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from...
CVE-2024-49394
In mutt and neomutt the In-Reply-To email header field is not protected by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker to reuse an unencrypted but signed email message to impersonate the original sender...
CVE-2024-49394
In mutt and neomutt the In-Reply-To email header field is not protected by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker to reuse an unencrypted but signed email message to impersonate the original sender...
DEBIAN-CVE-2024-49394
In mutt and neomutt the In-Reply-To email header field is not protected by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker to reuse an unencrypted but signed email message to impersonate the original sender...
CVE-2024-49393
In neomutt and mutt, the To and Cc email headers are not validated by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker that intercepts a message to change their value and include himself as a one of the recipients to compromise message confidentiality...
CVE-2024-49393
In neomutt and mutt, the To and Cc email headers are not validated by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker that intercepts a message to change their value and include himself as a one of the recipients to compromise message confidentiality...
CVE-2024-49394 Mutt: neomutt: in-reply-to email header field it not protected by cryptograpic signing
In mutt and neomutt the In-Reply-To email header field is not protected by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker to reuse an unencrypted but signed email message to impersonate the original sender...
CVE-2024-49394
In mutt and neomutt the In-Reply-To email header field is not protected by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker to reuse an unencrypted but signed email message to impersonate the original sender...
CVE-2024-49394 Mutt: neomutt: in-reply-to email header field it not protected by cryptograpic signing
In mutt and neomutt the In-Reply-To email header field is not protected by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker to reuse an unencrypted but signed email message to impersonate the original sender...
CVE-2024-49394
CVE-2024-49394 affects mutt and neomutt: the In-Reply-To header is not cryptographically signed, enabling an attacker to impersonate the sender by reusing an unencrypted but signed email. Public references in the connected documents show multiple advisories addressing this issue and releasing fix...
CVE-2024-49393 Mutt: neomutt: to and cc email header fields are not protected by cryptographic signing
In neomutt and mutt, the To and Cc email headers are not validated by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker that intercepts a message to change their value and include himself as a one of the recipients to compromise message confidentiality...
CVE-2024-49393 Mutt: neomutt: to and cc email header fields are not protected by cryptographic signing
In neomutt and mutt, the To and Cc email headers are not validated by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker that intercepts a message to change their value and include himself as a one of the recipients to compromise message confidentiality...
CVE-2024-49393
In neomutt and mutt, the To and Cc email headers are not validated by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker that intercepts a message to change their value and include himself as a one of the recipients to compromise message confidentiality...
PT-2024-33505
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions mutt and neomutt affected versions not specified Description The issue concerns the In-Reply-To email header field in mutt and neomutt, which is not protected by cryptographic signing. This allows an attacker to reuse an unencrypted but signed...
ALSA-2024:9404 Moderate: libgcrypt security update
The libgcrypt library provides general-purpose implementations of various cryptographic algorithms. Security Fixes: libgcrypt: vulnerable to Marvin Attack CVE-2024-2236 For more details about the security issues, including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information,...