CVE-2026-1111-Smart-Contract-Cross-Function-Reentrancy

CVE-2026-1111 – 스마트 계약 교차 함수 재진입 프로그램 코드 Solidity + Python // VulnerableBank.sol - Simplified reentrancy example with cross-function bypass pragma solidity ^0.8.0; contract VulnerableBank mappingaddress = uint256 public balances; function deposit public payable balancesmsg.sender += msg.value;...

Exploit for Path Traversal in Publiccms

--- CVE-2026-1111 – Smart Contract Cross‑Function Reentrancy...

GHSA-5824-CM3X-3C38 Vyper has incorrectly allocated named re-entrancy locks

Impact In versions 0.2.15, 0.2.16 and 0.3.0, named re-entrancy locks are allocated incorrectly. Each function using a named re-entrancy lock gets a unique lock regardless of the key, allowing cross-function re-entrancy in contracts compiled with the susceptible versions. A specific set of...

PT-2023-26896 · Vyper · Vyper

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Vyper versions 0.2.15 through 0.3.0 Description: The issue arises from the incorrect allocation of named re-entrancy locks in Vyper versions 0.2.15, 0.2.16, and 0.3.0. Each function using a named re-entrancy lock gets a unique lock regardless...

In the lend() function state updates are made after the callback

Handle jayjonah8 Vulnerability details Impact In TimeswapPair.sol, the lend function has a callback to the msg.sender in the middle of the function while there are still updates to state that take place after the callback. The lock modifier guards against reentrancy but not against cross function...