Controlling the ERC20 Token contract from symbol is not secure

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact BaseV1-periphery.solL491 in the getUnderlyingPrice function , the correctness of the CToken contract received from the instance is done with if compareStringssymbol, "cCANTO" on line BaseV1-periphery.solL490 This is not a safe way, fake contracts similar...

USE SAME SYMBOL CAN GET FAKED PRICE OF TOKEN

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact it compare symbol to identify token，it can be exploit to produce fake price of token. Proof of Concept attacker can create a token which is like cToken and has symbol of cNOTE .When somebody call comptroller’s liquidateCalculateSeizeTokens ，it will give ...

CVE-2022-36061

Elrond go is the go implementation for the Elrond Network protocol. In versions prior to 1.3.35, read only calls between contracts can generate smart contracts results. For example, if contract A calls in read only mode contract B and the called function will make changes upon the contract's B...

Code injection

Elrond go is the go implementation for the Elrond Network protocol. In versions prior to 1.3.35, read only calls between contracts can generate smart contracts results. For example, if contract A calls in read only mode contract B and the called function will make changes upon the contract's B...

CVE-2022-36061 Elrond go can execute on same context checks in VM

Elrond go is the go implementation for the Elrond Network protocol. In versions prior to 1.3.35, read only calls between contracts can generate smart contracts results. For example, if contract A calls in read only mode contract B and the called function will make changes upon the contract's B...

CVE-2022-36061

CVE-2022-36061 (Elrond-go) affects the Go implementation of the Elrond Network. In versions prior to 1.3.35, read‑only contract calls can produce smart contract results and alter the state of the callee (contract B) as if the call were not read‑only. This violates read‑only semantics and can caus...

CVE-2022-36061 Elrond go can execute on same context checks in VM

Elrond go is the go implementation for the Elrond Network protocol. In versions prior to 1.3.35, read only calls between contracts can generate smart contracts results. For example, if contract A calls in read only mode contract B and the called function will make changes upon the contract's B...

CVE-2022-36061 Elrond go can execute on same context checks in VM

Elrond go is the go implementation for the Elrond Network protocol. In versions prior to 1.3.35, read only calls between contracts can generate smart contracts results. For example, if contract A calls in read only mode contract B and the called function will make changes upon the contract's B...

Improper Initialization

Elrond go is the go implementation for the Elrond Network protocol. In versions prior to 1.3.35, read only calls between contracts can generate smart contracts results. For example, if contract A calls in read only mode contract B and the called function will make changes upon the contract's B...

FBI Warns Investors to Take Precautions with Decentralized Financial Platforms

The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI on Monday warned of cyber criminals increasingly exploiting flaws in decentralized finance DeFi platforms to plunder cryptocurrency. "The FBI has observed cyber criminals exploiting vulnerabilities in the smart contracts governing DeFi platforms to ste...

quorumvotes() on LogicV2 changed its signature.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The team states: // NounsDAOLogicV2 removes: // - quorumVotes has been replaced by quorumVotesuint256 proposalId. But the signature of the function changed. It is a read-only function and it is hard to imagine a bad transaction flow with it. But is a bad...

Voting power determined by proposal creation block enables inherent voting manipulation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The voting power for a Nouns holder for a given proposal is calculated as the number of Nouns held at the time of proposal creation. This creates an opportunity for voting manipulation by the proposal creator because they can specifically choose the time...

GHSA-F92V-GRC2-W2FG Ethermint vulnerable to DoS through unintended Contract Selfdestruct

Vulnerability Report Impact Smart contract applications that make use of the selfdestruct functionality and their end-users. Classification The vulnerability has been classified as high with a CVSS score of 8.2. It has the potential to create a denial-of-service to all contracts that can invoke t...

GHSA-XRC4-737V-9Q75 OpenZeppelin Contracts's GovernorVotesQuorumFraction updates to quorum may affect past defeated proposals

Impact This issue concerns instances of Governor that use the module GovernorVotesQuorumFraction, a mechanism that determines quorum requirements as a percentage of the voting token's total supply. In affected instances, when a proposal is passed to lower the quorum requirement, past proposals ma...

Different SafeERC20 contracts are being used

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Two different contracts with the name SafeERC20 are being used. Proof of Concept Tools Used Vim Recommended Mitigation Steps Use a different name for the contract. --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: 👎 1 0xA5DF react...

Use of transfer() instead of call() to send eth

Lines of code Vulnerability details Use of transfer instead of call to send eth Impact OZSafeERC20.safeTransfer relies on transfer at the end, but with a check of the returning value. Same happens with OZSafeERC20.safeTransferFrom and transferFrom. However, the use of transfer might render ETH...

CVE-2022-35961

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The functions ECDSA.recover and ECDSA.tryRecover are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issu...

Format string

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The functions ECDSA.recover and ECDSA.tryRecover are vulnerable to a kind of signature malleability due to accepting EIP-2098 compact signatures in addition to the traditional 65 byte signature format. This is only an issu...

Single-step ownership change for contracts is risky

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details The owner addresses can be changed in a single-step in VotingEscrow. If set to the wrong address this could lead to loss/lock of funds or allow a malicious smart contract to interact with the protocol. When privileged roles are being...

[H1] Some admins functions are unusable because of misuse of variables in upgradeable contracts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact ​ Admin functions in NFTCollectionFactor.sol are unusable through a proxy Proof of Concept ​ Upgradeable contracts cannot use neither constructors nor use immutable variables. The reason for that is they work behind a proxy which calls them using...