CVE-2023-30541 TransparentUpgradeableProxy clashing selector calls may not be delegated in @openzeppelin/contracts

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. A function in the implementation contract may be inaccessible if its selector clashes with one of the proxy's own selectors. Specifically, if the clashing function has a different signature with incompatible ABI encoding,...

Protect intellectual property with Govern 365 and Microsoft Purview

This blog post is part of the Microsoft Intelligent Security Association guest blog series. Learn more about MISA. Global supply chains face a broad range of risks, from physical threats to cybersecurity threats. Sharing information with suppliers is essential for the supply chain to function...

OpenZeppelin 安全漏洞

OpenZeppelin is a software application. A standard for secure blockchain applications. A security vulnerability exists in OpenZeppelin Contracts prior to version 4.8.3, which stems from the fact that if conflicting functions have different signatures and incompatible ABI encodings, an agent may...

CVE-2023-30542

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The proposal creation entrypoint propose in GovernorCompatibilityBravo allows the creation of proposals with a signatures array shorter than the calldatas array. This causes the additional elements of the latter to be...

Design/Logic Flaw

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The proposal creation entrypoint propose in GovernorCompatibilityBravo allows the creation of proposals with a signatures array shorter than the calldatas array. This causes the additional elements of the latter to be...

CVE-2023-30542

CVE-2023-30542 concerns OpenZeppelin Contracts’ GovernorCompatibilityBravo: the propose entrypoint may allow a signatures array shorter than the calldatas array, causing extra calldatas to be ignored and potentially executing actions without calldata if the proposal passes. The event reflects wha...

CVE-2023-30542 GovernorCompatibilityBravo may trim proposal calldata

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The proposal creation entrypoint propose in GovernorCompatibilityBravo allows the creation of proposals with a signatures array shorter than the calldatas array. This causes the additional elements of the latter to be...

CVE-2023-30542 GovernorCompatibilityBravo may trim proposal calldata

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The proposal creation entrypoint propose in GovernorCompatibilityBravo allows the creation of proposals with a signatures array shorter than the calldatas array. This causes the additional elements of the latter to be...

CVE-2023-30542 GovernorCompatibilityBravo may trim proposal calldata

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. The proposal creation entrypoint propose in GovernorCompatibilityBravo allows the creation of proposals with a signatures array shorter than the calldatas array. This causes the additional elements of the latter to be...

OpenZeppelin 输入验证错误漏洞

OpenZeppelin is a software application. A standard for secure blockchain applications. An input validation error vulnerability exists in OpenZeppelin Contracts. An attacker exploiting this vulnerability could perform arbitrary actions...

PT-2023-22769 · Openzeppelin · Openzeppelin Contracts

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: OpenZeppelin Contracts versions prior to 4.8.3 Description: The proposal creation entrypoint propose in GovernorCompatibilityBravo allows the creation of proposals with a signatures array shorter than the calldatas array. This causes the...

InitialETHCrowdfund + ReraiseETHCrowdfund: batchContributeFor function may not refund ETH which leads to loss of funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact This vulnerability exists in both the InitialETHCrowdfund and ReraiseETHCrowdfund contracts in exactly the same way. I will continue this report by explaining the issue in only one contract. The mitigation section however contains the fix for both...

[H-01] RETH oracle manipulation allows attacker to steal funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The Asymmetry SafEth protocol aims to help diversify and decentralize liquid staking derivatives, exchanging ether staked in the protocol for staked ether derivative tokens based on some relative weighting. A function exposed by these derivative wrapper...

Reth flashloan attack

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Using a flashloan to manipulate rETH/ETH price a hacker can receive more SafEth shares for the same amount of ether, thus draining all three derivative contracts rETH, SfrxEth and WstEth. Proof of Concept Reth.poolPrice depends on UniswapV3 pool.slot0...

Financial cyberthreats in 2022

Financial gain remains the key driver of cybercriminal activity. In the past year, weve seen multiple developments in this area – from new attack schemes targeting contactless payments to multiple ransomware groups continuing to emerge and haunt businesses. However, traditional financial threats ...

function _nonSystemDeployOnAddress() should try another nonces when getNewAddressCreate() result is in kernel space otherwise some logics would be broken

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function createAccount Deploys a contract account with similar address derivation rules to the EVM's CREATE opcode. the deployed contract address is calculated based on sender deployed nonce. code uses nonSystemDeployOnAddress to deploy the contract to n...

deploying contracts with forceDeployOnAddress will break contracts when callConstructor is false

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact when function forceDeployOnAddress used for deploying contract and callConstructor is false, then contract's bytecodehash would stay in constructing state and calling the contract won't be possible. it can cause protocol and other contracts that are usin...

External calls can be manipulated

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact By making external calls to untrusted contracts, the sender might manipulate the contract's state and cause unintended behavior. Proof of Concept In the tokenURI and mint functions, the contract makes external calls to ERC721nftContract.tokenURInftID and...

User transactions can call system contracts directly

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User transaction can call system contracts directly, which shouldn't be allowed to not invoke potentially dangerous operations. Proof of Concept The DefaultAccount.executeTransaction executes a user transaction after it was validated. The function calls...

EVM Elliptic Curve Recovery Discrepancy

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The Ecrecover.yul file meant to simulate the ecrecover mechanism as executed by traditional ETH 1.0 consensus mechanisms is incorrect. In detail, it does not conform to the "Homestead" update which introduced an upper-bound check for s values of an r, s,...