300 matches found
CVE-2026-3849
Stack Buffer Overflow in wcHpkeLabeledExtract via Oversized ECH Config. A vulnerability existed in wolfSSL 5.8.4 ECH Encrypted Client Hello support, where a maliciously crafted ECH config could cause a stack buffer overflow on the client side, leading to potential remote execution and client...
CVE-2026-3549
CVE-2026-3549 describes a heap overflow in TLS 1.3 ECH parsing due to an integer underflow while calculating a buffer length in the ECH extension parsing logic. The issue can cause writes beyond allocated buffers. Public sources consistently reference wolfSSL and note that ECH is off by default; ...
CVE-2026-3549 ECH parsing heap buffer overflow
Heap Overflow in TLS 1.3 ECH parsing. An integer underflow existed in ECH extension parsing logic when calculating a buffer length, which resulted in writing beyond the bounds of an allocated buffer. Note that in wolfSSL, ECH is off by default, and the ECH standard is still evolving...
CVE-2026-3549 ECH parsing heap buffer overflow
Heap Overflow in TLS 1.3 ECH parsing. An integer underflow existed in ECH extension parsing logic when calculating a buffer length, which resulted in writing beyond the bounds of an allocated buffer. Note that in wolfSSL, ECH is off by default, and the ECH standard is still evolving...
CVE-2026-3549
Heap Overflow in TLS 1.3 ECH parsing. An integer underflow existed in ECH extension parsing logic when calculating a buffer length, which resulted in writing beyond the bounds of an allocated buffer. Note that in wolfSSL, ECH is off by default, and the ECH standard is still evolving...
CVE-2026-3549 ECH parsing heap buffer overflow
Heap Overflow in TLS 1.3 ECH parsing. An integer underflow existed in ECH extension parsing logic when calculating a buffer length, which resulted in writing beyond the bounds of an allocated buffer. Note that in wolfSSL, ECH is off by default, and the ECH standard is still evolving...
wolfSSL(CyaSSL) 安全漏洞
wolfSSL CyaSSL is a small, portable embedded SSL programming library developed by the American company wolfSSL, designed for developers working with embedded systems. wolfSSL CyaSSL contains security vulnerabilities; one of these vulnerabilities stems from a heap overflow in TLS 1.3 ECH parsing...
PT-2026-26349
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions wolfSSL version 5.8.4 Description A flaw exists in wolfSSL 5.8.4’s Encrypted Client Hello ECH support. A specially crafted ECH configuration from a malicious TLS server can trigger a stack buffer overflow on the client side. This could...
PT-2026-26339
Heap Overflow in TLS 1.3 ECH parsing. An integer underflow existed in ECH extension parsing logic when calculating a buffer length, which resulted in writing beyond the bounds of an allocated buffer. Note that in wolfSSL, ECH is off by default, and the ECH standard is still evolving...
CVE-2025-13476 Rakuten Viber uses broken or risky cryptographic Algorithm
Rakuten Viber Cloak mode in Android v25.7.2.0g and Windows v25.6.0.0–v25.8.1.0 uses a static and predictable TLS ClientHello fingerprint lacking extension diversity, allowing Deep Packet Inspection DPI systems to trivially identify and block proxy traffic, undermining censorship circumvention...
CVE-2025-13476 Rakuten Viber uses broken or risky cryptographic Algorithm
Rakuten Viber Cloak mode in Android v25.7.2.0g and Windows v25.6.0.0–v25.8.1.0 uses a static and predictable TLS ClientHello fingerprint lacking extension diversity, allowing Deep Packet Inspection DPI systems to trivially identify and block proxy traffic, undermining censorship circumvention...
GO-2026-4509 Fingerprint vulnerability in uTLS from GREASE ECH mismatch for Chrome parrots in github.com/refraction-networking/utls
Fingerprint vulnerability in uTLS from GREASE ECH mismatch for Chrome parrots in github.com/refraction-networking/utls...
DEBIAN-CVE-2026-26994
uTLS is a fork of crypto/tls, created to customize ClientHello for fingerprinting resistance while still using it for the handshake. In versions 1.6.7 and below, uTLS did not implement the TLS 1.3 downgrade protection mechanism specified in RFC 8446 Section 4.1.3 when using a uTLS ClientHello spe...
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-27017
uTLS is a fork of crypto/tls, created to customize ClientHello for fingerprinting resistance while still using it for the handshake. Versions 1.6.0 through 1.8.0 contain a fingerprint mismatch with Chrome when using GREASE ECH, related to cipher suite selection. When Chrome selects the preferred...
CVE-2026-26994
uTLS is a fork of crypto/tls, created to customize ClientHello for fingerprinting resistance while still using it for the handshake. In versions 1.6.7 and below, uTLS did not implement the TLS 1.3 downgrade protection mechanism specified in RFC 8446 Section 4.1.3 when using a uTLS ClientHello spe...
CVE-2026-26994
uTLS is a fork of crypto/tls, created to customize ClientHello for fingerprinting resistance while still using it for the handshake. In versions 1.6.7 and below, uTLS did not implement the TLS 1.3 downgrade protection mechanism specified in RFC 8446 Section 4.1.3 when using a uTLS ClientHello spe...
CVE-2026-27017
CVE-2026-27017 affects the uTLS fork of crypto/tls ( Versions 1.6.0–1.8.0 ) with GREASE ECH, causing a fingerprint mismatch with Chrome due to inconsistent cipher-suite selection between the outer ClientHello and ECH. Specifically, uTLS hardcodes AES for the outer cipher suite while randomly sele...
CVE-2026-1584
A flaw was found in gnutls. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted ClientHello message with an invalid Pre-Shared Key PSK binder value during the TLS handshake. This can lead to a NULL pointer dereference, causing the server to crash and...
CVE-2026-24904
CVE-2026-24904 concerns TrustTunnel, an open‑source VPN protocol. The issue arises prior to version 0.9.115 where a rule-by-prefix bypass could occur: in tls_listener.rs, TlsListener::listen() peeks 1024 bytes and calls extract_client_random(...). If parse_tls_plaintext fails (e.g., fragmented/pa...
AZL-78933 CVE-2025-61730 affecting package golang 1.25.7-1
During the TLS 1.3 handshake if multiple messages are sent in records that span encryption level boundaries for instance the Client Hello and Encrypted Extensions messages, the subsequent messages may be processed before the encryption level changes. This can cause some minor information disclosu...