Lucene search
+L

4591 matches found

Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2026/05/05 12:00 a.m.•3 views

PT-2026-41403

Summary ciguard's FastAPI Web UI src/ciguard/web/app.py does not set HTTP defence-in-depth headers. OWASP ZAP baseline scan flagged 11 alerts: missing Content-Security-Policy Medium, X-Frame-Options Medium, Sub-Resource-Integrity on /api/docs Medium, COOP / COEP / CORP Low, Permissions-Policy Low...

4.3CVSS5.8AI score
SaveExploits0References5
IBM Security Bulletins
IBM Security Bulletins
•added 2026/04/17 1:12 p.m.•16 views

Security Bulletin: DevOps Test Performance contains a vulnerability related to use of Spring Security

Summary Due to use of Spring Security, DevOps Test Performance and Rational Performance Tester contain a vulnerability that can potentially result in clickjacking, XSS, and sensitive data exposure via caching. CVE-2026-22732 Vulnerability Details CVEID:CVE-2026-22732 DESCRIPTION: When application...

9.1CVSS8.1AI score0.00489EPSS
SaveExploits3Affected Software1
GithubExploit
GithubExploit
•added 2026/03/27 11:04 p.m.•239 views

websec-payloads

Web Security Payloads & Exploitation Reference Comprehensiv...

5.9AI score
SaveExploits0
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2026/03/27 2:27 p.m.•24 views

CVE-2021-27003

Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.5P18, 9.6P15, 9.7P14, 9.8P5 and 9.9.1 are missing an X-Frame-Options header which could allow a clickjacking attack...

4.7CVSS5.6AI score0.00619EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
osv_ghsa
osv_ghsa
•added 2026/03/25 5:32 p.m.•23 views

GHSA-3MJM-X6GW-2X42 @grackle-ai/server has Missing Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options Headers

Impact The HTTP server does not set Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options headers on any response. This reduces defense-in-depth against XSS, clickjacking, and MIME-sniffing attacks. While the current XSS attack surface is small React-markdown is configured safely, n...

5.3CVSS5.8AI score
SaveExploits0References2
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2026/03/25 12:00 a.m.•3 views

PT-2026-30391

Impact The HTTP server does not set Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options headers on any response. This reduces defense-in-depth against XSS, clickjacking, and MIME-sniffing attacks. While the current XSS attack surface is small React-markdown is configured safely, n...

5.3CVSS5.9AI score
SaveExploits0References3
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2026/03/03 1:37 p.m.•21 views

CVE-2025-58406

The CGM CLININET application respond without essential security HTTP headers, exposing users to client‑side attacks such as clickjacking, MIME sniffing, unsafe caching, weak cross‑origin isolation, and missing transport security controls...

5.3CVSS5.9AI score0.00192EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
RedhatCVE
RedhatCVE
•added 2026/03/03 1:37 p.m.•18 views

CVE-2025-58405

The CGM CLININET application does not implement any mechanisms that prevent clickjacking attacks, neither HTTP security headers nor HTML-based frame‑busting protections were detected. As a result, an attacker can embed the application inside a maliciously crafted IFRAME and trick users into...

6.1CVSS5.9AI score0.00179EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
osv_cve
osv_cve
•added 2026/03/02 12:16 p.m.•20 views

CVE-2025-58406

The CGM CLININET application respond without essential security HTTP headers, exposing users to client‑side attacks such as clickjacking, MIME sniffing, unsafe caching, weak cross‑origin isolation, and missing transport security controls...

4.3CVSS5.9AI score0.00192EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/03/02 12:16 p.m.•26 views

CVE-2025-58406

The CGM CLININET application respond without essential security HTTP headers, exposing users to client‑side attacks such as clickjacking, MIME sniffing, unsafe caching, weak cross‑origin isolation, and missing transport security controls...

5.3CVSS0.00192EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
osv_cve
osv_cve
•added 2026/03/02 12:16 p.m.•24 views

CVE-2025-58405

The CGM CLININET application does not implement any mechanisms that prevent clickjacking attacks, neither HTTP security headers nor HTML-based frame‑busting protections were detected. As a result, an attacker can embed the application inside a maliciously crafted IFRAME and trick users into...

6.1CVSS5.9AI score0.00185EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/03/02 12:16 p.m.•25 views

CVE-2025-58405

The CGM CLININET application does not implement any mechanisms that prevent clickjacking attacks, neither HTTP security headers nor HTML-based frame‑busting protections were detected. As a result, an attacker can embed the application inside a maliciously crafted IFRAME and trick users into...

6.1CVSS0.00179EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/03/02 11:16 a.m.•18 views

CVE-2025-58406 Lack of HTTP Response Headers

The CGM CLININET application respond without essential security HTTP headers, exposing users to client‑side attacks such as clickjacking, MIME sniffing, unsafe caching, weak cross‑origin isolation, and missing transport security controls...

5.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00192EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
attackerkb
attackerkb
•added 2026/03/02 11:16 a.m.•16 views

CVE-2025-58406

The CGM CLININET application respond without essential security HTTP headers, exposing users to client‑side attacks such as clickjacking, MIME sniffing, unsafe caching, weak cross‑origin isolation, and missing transport security controls...

8.8CVSS5.9AI score0.00192EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/03/02 11:16 a.m.•33 views

EUVD-2025-208152

The CGM CLININET application respond without essential security HTTP headers, exposing users to client‑side attacks such as clickjacking, MIME sniffing, unsafe caching, weak cross‑origin isolation, and missing transport security controls...

8.8CVSS5.9AI score0.00192EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/03/02 11:16 a.m.•53 views

CVE-2025-58406 Lack of HTTP Response Headers

The CGM CLININET application respond without essential security HTTP headers, exposing users to client‑side attacks such as clickjacking, MIME sniffing, unsafe caching, weak cross‑origin isolation, and missing transport security controls...

5.3CVSS0.00192EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/03/02 11:16 a.m.•54 views

CVE-2025-58406

Technical details about CVE-2025-58406 are not provided in the supplied documents. For CGM CLININET, specifics such as affected versions, root cause, and fixes are not disclosed here; monitor for updates.

5.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00192EPSS
SaveExploits0References2Affected Software1
attackerkb
attackerkb
•added 2026/03/02 11:16 a.m.•14 views

CVE-2025-58405

The CGM CLININET application does not implement any mechanisms that prevent clickjacking attacks, neither HTTP security headers nor HTML-based frame‑busting protections were detected. As a result, an attacker can embed the application inside a maliciously crafted IFRAME and trick users into...

8.8CVSS5.9AI score0.00185EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/03/02 11:16 a.m.•23 views

EUVD-2025-208151

The CGM CLININET application does not implement any mechanisms that prevent clickjacking attacks, neither HTTP security headers nor HTML-based frame‑busting protections were detected. As a result, an attacker can embed the application inside a maliciously crafted IFRAME and trick users into...

8.8CVSS5.9AI score0.00185EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/03/02 11:16 a.m.•54 views

CVE-2025-58405

The CVE-2025-58405 entry concerns the CGM CLININET application, where the component does not implement any mechanisms to prevent clickjacking. The Red Hat RH CVEs likewise describe the same issue. Technical details indicate a lack of HTTP security headers or frame-busting protections, enabling em...

6.1CVSS5.9AI score0.00179EPSS
SaveExploits0References2Affected Software1
Rows per page
Query Builder