Lucene search
+L

4620 matches found

Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2019/01/09 12:00 a.m.•9 views

CVE-2018-16172: Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames

Improper countermeasure against clickjacking attack in client certificates management screen was discovered in Cybozu Remote Service 3.0.0 to 3.1.8, that allows remote attackers to trick a user to delete the registered client certificate...

6.5CVSS5.8AI score0.006EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2019/01/09 12:00 a.m.•6 views

PT-2019-9237

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Cybozu Remote Service versions 3.0.0 through 3.1.8 Description An issue was found in the client certificates management screen, where an improper countermeasure against clickjacking attacks was discovered. This allows remote attackers to trick...

6.5CVSS0.006EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Japan Vulnerability Notes
Japan Vulnerability Notes
•added 2018/12/26 3:09 a.m.•12 views

Clickjacking Vulnerability in Hitachi Automation Director

Overview A Clickjacking Vulnerability was found in Hitachi Automation Director. Impact Regarding the impact of the vulnerability, please refer to the vendor advisory. Solution Please refer to the 'Vendor Information' section for the official countermeasure and take appropriate action...

4.3CVSS6.7AI score
SaveExploits0References2
Hacker One
Hacker One
•added 2018/12/25 9:03 p.m.•17 views

Mail.ru: Make user buy items via clickjacking possibility

Clickjacking attack could allow to force user to buy some item on lootdog.io...

4.2AI score
SaveExploits0
Tenable Nessus
Tenable Nessus
•added 2018/12/21 12:00 a.m.•502 views

IBM BigFix Platform 9.2.x < 9.2.15 / 9.5.x < 9.5.10 Multiple Vulnerabilities

According to its self-reported version, the IBM BigFix Platform application running on the remote host is 9.2.x prior to 9.2.15, or 9.5.x prior to 9.5.10. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities : - IBM BigFix Platform is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks, caused by...

7.5CVSS6.5AI score0.18596EPSS
SaveExploits0References9
Github Security Blog
Github Security Blog
•added 2018/12/20 10:02 p.m.•47 views

Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames in Apache nifif

The X-Frame-Options headers were applied inconsistently on some HTTP responses, resulting in duplicate or missing security headers. Some browsers would interpret these results incorrectly, allowing clickjacking attacks. Mitigation: The fix to consistently apply the security headers was applied on...

6.5CVSS2AI score0.0268EPSS
SaveExploits0References5Affected Software1
osv_ghsa
osv_ghsa
•added 2018/12/20 10:02 p.m.•51 views

GHSA-2XPP-75VR-22VQ Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames in Apache nifif

The X-Frame-Options headers were applied inconsistently on some HTTP responses, resulting in duplicate or missing security headers. Some browsers would interpret these results incorrectly, allowing clickjacking attacks. Mitigation: The fix to consistently apply the security headers was applied on...

6.5CVSS6.4AI score0.0268EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
Veracode
Veracode
•added 2018/12/20 4:29 a.m.•43 views

Clickjacking Attack

nifi-web-api is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks. The vulnerability exists due to the way the X-Frame-Options headers were inconsistently applied on HTTP responses. This results in different outcomes such as duplicate, or missing security headers, causing some browsers to insecurely interpret t...

6.5CVSS6.3AI score0.02758EPSS
SaveExploits0References8Affected Software2
osv_cve
osv_cve
•added 2018/12/19 2:29 p.m.•36 views

CVE-2018-17192

The X-Frame-Options headers were applied inconsistently on some HTTP responses, resulting in duplicate or missing security headers. Some browsers would interpret these results incorrectly, allowing clickjacking attacks. Mitigation: The fix to consistently apply the security headers was applied on...

6.5CVSS6.9AI score0.0268EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Prion
Prion
•added 2018/12/19 2:29 p.m.•34 views

Design/Logic Flaw

The X-Frame-Options headers were applied inconsistently on some HTTP responses, resulting in duplicate or missing security headers. Some browsers would interpret these results incorrectly, allowing clickjacking attacks. Mitigation: The fix to consistently apply the security headers was applied on...

4.3CVSS6.5AI score0.0268EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
NVD
NVD
•added 2018/12/19 2:29 p.m.•38 views

CVE-2018-17192

The X-Frame-Options headers were applied inconsistently on some HTTP responses, resulting in duplicate or missing security headers. Some browsers would interpret these results incorrectly, allowing clickjacking attacks. Mitigation: The fix to consistently apply the security headers was applied on...

6.5CVSS6.5AI score0.0268EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2018/12/19 2:00 p.m.•43 views

CVE-2018-17192

The X-Frame-Options headers were applied inconsistently on some HTTP responses, resulting in duplicate or missing security headers. Some browsers would interpret these results incorrectly, allowing clickjacking attacks. Mitigation: The fix to consistently apply the security headers was applied on...

6.5AI score0.0268EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Mend
Mend
•added 2018/12/19 2:00 p.m.•6 views

CVE-2018-17192

The X-Frame-Options headers were applied inconsistently on some HTTP responses, resulting in duplicate or missing security headers. Some browsers would interpret these results incorrectly, allowing clickjacking attacks. Mitigation: The fix to consistently apply the security headers was applied on...

7.1CVSS0.0268EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
CVE
CVE
•added 2018/12/19 2:00 p.m.•113 views

CVE-2018-17192

CVE-2018-17192 affects Apache NiFi where the X-Frame-Options headers were inconsistently applied on HTTP responses, leading to duplicate or missing security headers and potential clickjacking. The issue is documented across multiple sources, with mitigations indicating that a fix was applied in N...

6.5CVSS6.4AI score0.0268EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2018/12/19 12:00 a.m.•13 views

CVE-2018-17192: Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames

The X-Frame-Options headers were applied inconsistently on some HTTP responses, resulting in duplicate or missing security headers. Some browsers would interpret these results incorrectly, allowing clickjacking attacks. Mitigation: The fix to consistently apply the security headers was applied on...

6.5CVSS5.8AI score0.0268EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2018/12/19 12:00 a.m.•7 views

PT-2018-13943

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Apache NiFi versions prior to 1.8.0 Description The issue arises from inconsistent application of the X-Frame-Options headers in HTTP responses, leading to potential clickjacking attacks due to incorrect interpretation by some browsers...

6.5CVSS0.0268EPSS
SaveExploits0References7
Hacker One
Hacker One
•added 2018/12/17 2:00 p.m.•425 views

Kaspersky: URL Advisor component in KIS products family is vulnerable to Universal XSS

Summary In Microsoft Edge, URL Advisor UI is served as first-party content on every domain. So the XSS vulnerability I found in this UI automatically applies to all websites, it allows running code in the context of any domain. Description URL Advisor frame is located under...

SaveExploits0
Hacker One
Hacker One
•added 2018/12/17 10:02 a.m.•29 views

Kaspersky: Certificate warnings and similar UI elements in Web protection of Anti-Virus products family are susceptible to clickjacking

Summary Clickjacking can be used to trick users into overriding certificate warnings, disabling Safe Money functionality or phishing alerts. Description On certificate warning pages, a single click is sufficient to trigger overriding a wrong certificate. While an additional warning is displayed...

SaveExploits0
CNVD
CNVD
•added 2018/12/14 12:00 a.m.•19 views

Mozilla Firefox 'feed preview' page clickjacking vulnerability

Mozilla Firefox is an open source web browser developed by the Mozilla Foundation in the United States. A security vulnerability exists in the embedded feed preview page in Mozilla Firefox versions prior to 64. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to trick a user into downloading and...

8.8CVSS8.7AI score0.01179EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
CNVD
CNVD
•added 2018/12/14 12:00 a.m.•18 views

IBM Security Access Manager Clickjacking Vulnerability

IBM Security Access Manager is a product for information security management applications from IBM, USA. The product enables access management control through integrated devices for web, mobile and cloud computing. A clickjacking vulnerability exists in IBM Security Access Manager versions 9.0.1....

6.1CVSS9AI score0.01183EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Rows per page
Query Builder