Upgraded Q -> M from #201 [1671458492331]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 201 as M risk. The relevant finding follows: Deposit function is not compatible with deflationary token The actual deposited amount might be lower than the specified depositAmount of the function parameter. This would lead to wrong interest rate calculations on...

Meta’s Tricky Quest to Protect Your Account

How do you keep Facebook easy to use without being trivial to exploit? The company is trying to chart a middle ground...

Upgraded Q -> M from #366 [1670366212013]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 366 as M risk. The relevant finding follows: 1. Not support fee-on-transfer tokens Every tokens of credit line will be transferred from lender to LineOfCredit first, then to borrower later. These 2-transfer steps will make the tax for some fee-on-transfer token...

PirexERC4626 and PirexGmx doesn't support erc20 tokens with fee on transfer

Lines of code Vulnerability details PirexERC4626 and PirexGmx doesn't support erc20 tokens with fee on transfer Vulnerability details There are ERC20 tokens that charge fee for every transfer / transferFrom. Different functions assumes assumes that the received amount is the same as the transfer...

SLOT owners lose half their value when there is no sETH deposited to the Syndicate.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description The Syndicate contract uses total balance as collateral for both sETH accumulatedETHPerFreeFloatingShare and SLOT rewards accumulatedETHPerCollateralizedSlotPerKnot. They are updated in the following function: function updateAccruedETHPerShares publ...

withdrawETHForKnot is vulnerable to reentrancy attack

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The withdrawETHForKnot is vulnerable to reentrancy because the transfer is done before an important state change. Proof of Concept function withdrawETHForKnotaddress recipient, bytes calldata blsPublicKeyOfKnot external requirerecipient != address0, "Zer...

CVE-2022-43323

EyouCMS V1.5.9-UTF8-SP1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery CSRF via the Top Up Balance component under the Edit Member module...

CVE-2022-43323

EyouCMS V1.5.9-UTF8-SP1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery CSRF via the Top Up Balance component under the Edit Member module...

PT-2022-26848 · Eyoucms · Eyoucms

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: EyouCMS version 1.5.9-UTF8-SP1 Description: A Cross-Site Request Forgery CSRF issue was discovered in the Top Up Balance component under the Edit Member module. This allows for malicious requests to be made without the user's knowledge or...

CVE-2022-43323: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

EyouCMS V1.5.9-UTF8-SP1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery CSRF via the Top Up Balance component under the Edit Member module...

CVE-2022-43323

CVE-2022-43323 affects EyouCMS version 1.5.9-UTF8-SP1. The issue is a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the Top Up Balance component within the Edit Member module. Root cause detail is CSRF in the specific Top Up Balance functionality; exploitation details are not elaborated beyond the CSRF la...

EyouCms 跨站请求伪造漏洞

Zanzan Network Technology EyouCms Eyou CMS is an open source content management system CMS based on ThinkPHP by China Zanzan Network Technology. A security vulnerability exists in EyouCms version V1.5.9-UTF8-SP1, which originates from the Top Up Balance component of its Edit Member module that...

CVE-2022-43323

EyouCMS V1.5.9-UTF8-SP1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery CSRF via the Top Up Balance component under the Edit Member module...

Exchange refund operation will return all ETH stored in the contract instead of the remaining amount from the exchange operation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Exchange refund operation will return all ETH stored in the contract instead of the remaining amount from the exchange operation The function that refunds remaining ETH in the Exchange contract will send back all the balance present in the contract instead of...

CVE-2022-43323

EyouCMS V1.5.9-UTF8-SP1 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery CSRF via the Top Up Balance component under the Edit Member module...

calling execute() may lead to stealing funds if some ETH is stuck on the contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact if some Ether is sent erroneously or not to the contract, anyone that calls correctly LooksRareAggregator.execute will be able to steal those coins. to execute the function using ethers as payment, these conditions must be true: there is at least a trade...

CVE-2022-3947

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in eolinker gokulite. This affects an unknown part of the file /balance/service/list. The manipulation of the argument route/keyword leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the...

CVE-2022-3947: Improper Neutralization

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in eolinker gokulite. This affects an unknown part of the file /balance/service/list. The manipulation of the argument route/keyword leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the...

PT-2022-24972 · Unknown · Eolinker Goku Lite

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: eolinker goku lite affected versions not specified Description: A critical issue has been found in eolinker goku lite, affecting an unknown part of the file /balance/service/list. The manipulation of the route/keyword argument leads to SQL...

Eolinker SQL注入漏洞

Eolinker, an API management solution from Eolinker China, is vulnerable to SQL injection, which stems from a lack of validation of external input SQL statements in the file /balance/service/list. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by gaining access to database information...