Security Bulletin: Multiple vulnerabilities in IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty may affect IBM Storage Protect Backup-Archive Client

Summary IBM Storage Protect Backup-Archive Client can be affected by security flaws in IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability using a certificate issued by a trusted authority to obtain sensitive information, as described in the "Vulnerability...

JetBrains TeamCity 安全漏洞

JetBrains TeamCity is a set of distributed build management and continuous integration tools from the Czech company JetBrains. The tool provides continuous unit testing, code quality analysis and build problem analysis reports and other features. An information disclosure vulnerability exists in...

PT-2024-9851 · Jetbrains · Teamcity

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: JetBrains TeamCity versions prior to 2024.12 Description: The issue is related to the exposure of user credentials and session cookies in backup files. This is due to incorrect removal of critical data. An attacker could exploit this to revea...

Discourse 3.4.x < 3.4.0.beta4 Multiple Vulnerabilities

Discourse is prone to multiple vulnerabilities. SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2024 Greenbone AG Some text descriptions might be excerpted from a referenced sources, and are Copyright C by the respective right holders. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only CPE = "cpe:/a:discourse:discourse"; ifdescripti...

CVE-2024-53991

Discourse backup file disclosure via default Nginx configuration (CVE-2024-53991) affects Discourse instances using FileStore::LocalStore for local uploads/backups. Attackers who know a backup filename can trick nginx into serving the backup file, exposing complete backups with sensitive data. Th...

CVE-2024-53991 Potential Backup file leaked via Nginx in Discourse

Discourse is an open source platform for community discussion. This vulnerability only impacts Discourse instances configured to use FileStore::LocalStore which means uploads and backups are stored locally on disk. If an attacker knows the name of the Discourse backup file, the attacker can trick...

CVE-2024-53991 Potential Backup file leaked via Nginx in Discourse

Discourse is an open source platform for community discussion. This vulnerability only impacts Discourse instances configured to use FileStore::LocalStore which means uploads and backups are stored locally on disk. If an attacker knows the name of the Discourse backup file, the attacker can trick...

Veeam Product Upgrade Guides

Upgrade Guides This article provides a list with links to the upgrade guides available within each product's user guide. Veeam Data Platform Veeam Backup & Replication Veeam ONE Veeam Recovery Orchestrator Veeam Plug-ins for Enterprise Applications Veeam Plug-in for SAP HANA Veeam Plug-in for...

WordPress WP SuperBackup plugin <= 2.3.3 - Unauthenticated Backup File Download Vulnerability

Unauthenticated Backup File Download Vulnerability discovered by Dave Jong Patchstack in WordPress Plugin WP SuperBackup versions = 2.3.3...

CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...

DEBIAN-CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...

UBUNTU-CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...

The vulnerability of Veeam Backup & Replication’s virtual and physical systems arises from the limited ability to restrict the path name to the restricted access directory. This allows attackers to compromise the integrity and accessibility of the protected information.

The vulnerability of Veeam Backup & Replication virtual and physical systems is related to the limited ability to access the directory. Exploiting this vulnerability can allow a malicious actor to influence the integrity and accessibility of the protected information...

Vulnerability of Veeam Backup & Replication virtual and physical systems, related to incorrect verification of the TLS certificate, allows attackers to execute a “man-in-the-middle” attack.

The vulnerability in Veeam Backup & Replication and physical systems exists due to incorrect verification of the TLS certificate. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow a malicious actor to carry out a “man-in-the-middle” attack...

The vulnerability in virtual and physical systems of Veeam Backup & Replication lies in the insufficient protection of registration data, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary codes.

The vulnerability of virtual and physical systems managed by Veeam Backup & Replication is related to insufficient protection of registration data. Exploiting these vulnerabilities could allow a malicious actor, operating remotely, to execute arbitrary code...

CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...

CVE-2024-56169

Fort Validator (Fort) versions up to 1.6.4 are affected by a validation integrity issue where the backup cache is only used to save bandwidth, and there is no viable fallback if a fetch fails or yields incorrect files. This leads to incomplete route-origin validation data. Upgrading to 2.0.0 or l...

CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...

CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...

Vulnerability of Veeam Backup & Replication virtual and physical systems, due to authentication procedures that lack sufficient protection. This allows attackers to alter multi-factor authentication parameters and circumvent existing security restrictions.

The vulnerability of virtual and physical systems managed by Veeam Backup & Replication is related to deficiencies in authentication procedures. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow attackers to alter the parameters of Multi-Factor Authentication MFA and circumvent existing security...