Lucene search
+L

1887 matches found

ATTACKERKB
ATTACKERKB
added 2022/10/18 9:15 p.m.5 views

CVE-2022-39406

Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise Common Components product of Oracle PeopleSoft component: Approval Framework. The supported version that is affected is 9.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise...

8.1CVSS7.4AI score0.00672EPSS
SaveExploits0References2Affected Software1
NVD
NVD
added 2022/10/18 9:15 p.m.20 views

CVE-2022-39406

Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise Common Components product of Oracle PeopleSoft component: Approval Framework. The supported version that is affected is 9.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise...

8.1CVSS0.00672EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Prion
Prion
added 2022/10/18 9:15 p.m.15 views

Design/Logic Flaw

Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise Common Components product of Oracle PeopleSoft component: Approval Framework. The supported version that is affected is 9.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise...

5.5CVSS8.1AI score0.00672EPSS
SaveExploits0References1Affected Software1
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
added 2022/10/18 12:00 a.m.13 views

CVE-2022-39406

Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise Common Components product of Oracle PeopleSoft component: Approval Framework. The supported version that is affected is 9.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise...

8.1CVSS6.9AI score0.00672EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
OSV
OSV
added 2022/10/17 4:15 p.m.5 views

UBUNTU-CVE-2022-3325

Improper access control in the GitLab CE/EE API affecting all versions starting from 12.8 before 15.2.5, all versions starting from 15.3 before 15.3.4, all versions starting from 15.4 before 15.4.1. Allowed for editing the approval rules via the API by an unauthorised user...

4.3CVSS7.3AI score0.00449EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
OSV
OSV
added 2022/10/17 12:00 a.m.23 views

CVE-2022-3325

Improper access control in the GitLab CE/EE API affecting all versions starting from 12.8 before 15.2.5, all versions starting from 15.3 before 15.3.4, all versions starting from 15.4 before 15.4.1. Allowed for editing the approval rules via the API by an unauthorised user...

2.7CVSS4.5AI score
SaveExploits0References4
CNNVD
CNNVD
added 2022/10/17 12:00 a.m.10 views

GitLab 安全漏洞

GitLab is an open source, end-to-end software development platform from GitLab, Inc. with built-in version control, issue tracking, code review, CI/CD Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery and other features. A security vulnerability exists in GitLab CE/EE versions 12.8 through 15.2.5,...

4.3CVSS6AI score0.00449EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
added 2022/10/17 12:00 a.m.7 views

CVE-2022-3325

Improper access control in the GitLab CE/EE API affecting all versions starting from 12.8 before 15.2.5, all versions starting from 15.3 before 15.3.4, all versions starting from 15.4 before 15.4.1. Allowed for editing the approval rules via the API by an unauthorised user...

2.7CVSS7AI score0.00449EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/10/10 12:00 a.m.15 views

ExecutionDelegate can approve arbitrary calling contract

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Owner can steal users' funds and tokens. Proof of Concept The owner of ExecutionDelegate can approve any contract to call it, e.g. a malicious contract which can then drain all funds and tokens approved by users to ExecutionDelegate. Users should only...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/10/10 12:00 a.m.15 views

Griefing of execute transaction sender

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description In function execute from BlurExchange contract there is a call of executeTokenTransfer function. The last one contains the following logic: function executeTokenTransfer address collection, address from, address to, uint256 tokenId, uint256 amount,...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/09/27 12:00 a.m.7 views

Forgetting to delete approval can help attacker mint any legendary gobbler with 0 cost of standard gobblers

Lines of code Vulnerability details 2022-09-artgobblers Forgetting to delete approval can help attacker mint any legendary gobbler with 0 cost of standard gobblers. tags: c4, 2022-09-artgobblers, high Affected code Impact When mint new lengendary gobbler, an amount of standard gobblers cost must ...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/09/27 12:00 a.m.6 views

A User can mint a legendary Gobbler for free

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A User can mint a legendary Gobbler for free. Proof of Concept The problem lies in GobblersERC721 approval storage. A user can get approval for a specific id. This approval is granted by the owner of the id or by an "all-approved" user of the owner...

6.6AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/09/27 12:00 a.m.8 views

Allowance isn't deleted when burning gobblers in mintLegendaryGobbler()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Legendary gobblers can be minted for free. Proof of Concept A simple attack allows anyone with enough gobblers to pay for a legendary to get it for free Step by step attack : -Attacker has 69 gobblers and gives approval of all of them to himself -Attacke...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/09/27 12:00 a.m.10 views

Users can mint legendary gobbler without losing any gobblers

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In ArtGobblers.mintLegendaryGobbler function, it mints a legendary gobbler by burning multiple standard gobblers. But instead of call burn, it just set getGobblerDataid.owner = address0. All the data of the standard gobbler will stay the same, included...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/09/26 12:00 a.m.11 views

When minting legendary NFT, non-legendary NFTs are burned, but burned token approval is not revoked, burned NFT TokenURI still accessible after burning.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. When minting legendary NFT, non-legendary NFTs are burned, only the owner of the burned nft is set to 0, emit Transfermsg.sender, getGobblerDataid.owner = address0, id; but burned token approval is not...

7.1AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/09/19 12:00 a.m.15 views

ERC1155.isApprovedForAll(owner, receiver) logic means it is possible for an approved receiver to withdraw more shares than expected

Lines of code Vulnerability details In the Readme, it is mentioned a receiver can call withdraw on behalf of the shares owner we accept deposits and withdraws on behalf of other users, by using approve ERC1155 functions on withdraw, and recipient/owner params inside both deposit/withdraw function...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/09/19 12:00 a.m.10 views

A malicious user could stuck crowdfund ETH

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A user could freeze funds accumulated in a crowdfund and execute a "fake sale" that would be the approval of the token. Proof of Concept A group of users create a crowdfund, they raise money to buy the most good looking Bored Ape. An attacker would buy i...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/09/19 12:00 a.m.19 views

Griefing attack on the Vaults is possible, withdrawing the winning side stakes

Lines of code Vulnerability details Anyone can withdraw to receiver once the receiver is isApprovedForAllowner, receiver. The funds will be sent to receiver, but it will happen whenever an arbitrary msg.sender wants. The only precondition is the presence of any approvals. This can be easily used ...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/09/01 12:00 a.m.19 views

TRSRY: front-runnable setApprovalFor

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker may be able to withdraw more than intended Proof of Concept Let's say the alice had approval of 100. Now the treasury custodian reduced the approval to 50. Alice could frontrun the setApprovalFor of 50, and withdraw 100 as it was before. Then...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2022/09/01 12:00 a.m.18 views

Swap at the lower cushion is impossible due to non approved withdrawal. Wrong implementation can cause free swaps.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Currently it is not clear how the swap user is approved for withdrawing from treasury. Depending on implementation, user could swap without spending any tokens, due to approval mechanism in the TRSRY module. Description In the swap function it should be...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder