Lucene search
+L

357 matches found

CVE
CVE
•added 2026/10/14 2:37 p.m.•27 views

CVE-2026-71184

The Gitea pull request review notifier fails to attach the pull request to the Actions notification , causing the fork workflow approval gate to fail to recognize runs originating from forks. This allows review comment , review approval , and rejection events to trigger workflow code from a fork ...

8.8CVSS5.9AI score
SaveExploits0References5
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/10/14 2:37 p.m.•11 views

CVE-2026-71184 Gitea fork workflow approval bypass through review events

Gitea's pull request review notifier does not attach the pull request to the Actions notification, so the fork workflow approval gate does not recognize the run as originating from a fork. Review comment and review approval or rejection events can consequently load workflow code from the fork hea...

SaveExploits0References5
AlpineLinux
AlpineLinux
•added 2026/10/14 2:37 p.m.•13 views

CVE-2026-71184

Gitea's pull request review notifier does not attach the pull request to the Actions notification, so the fork workflow approval gate does not recognize the run as originating from a fork. Review comment and review approval or rejection events can consequently load workflow code from the fork hea...

8.8CVSS5.9AI score
SaveExploits0
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/10/14 2:36 p.m.•37 views

CVE-2026-66877

Gitea is vulnerable to a workflow approval bypass where first-time fork contributor jobs can be executed without maintainer approval. The root cause is that certain job transition and dispatch paths fail to re-verify approval requirements when a separate, legitimate run sharing a job-level concur...

8.1CVSS6.2AI score
SaveExploits0References5
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/10/14 2:36 p.m.•11 views

CVE-2026-66877 Gitea fork workflow approval bypass through concurrency cancellation

Gitea enforces first-time fork contributor approval by blocking jobs, but some job transition and dispatch paths do not re-check the run's approval requirement. A separate run sharing a job-level concurrency group can cancel a pending job and cause its blocked sibling jobs to be re-emitted and...

SaveExploits0References5
AlpineLinux
AlpineLinux
•added 2026/10/14 2:36 p.m.•16 views

CVE-2026-66877

Gitea enforces first-time fork contributor approval by blocking jobs, but some job transition and dispatch paths do not re-check the run's approval requirement. A separate run sharing a job-level concurrency group can cancel a pending job and cause its blocked sibling jobs to be re-emitted and...

8.1CVSS6.2AI score
SaveExploits0
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/10/13 7:18 p.m.•5 views

CVE-2026-110206

Roo Code through 3.54.0 contains a command approval bypass vulnerability in parseCommandLine that allows attackers to auto-approve arbitrary shell commands by placing a command substitution in command position. Attackers using indirect prompt injection can submit commands like $echo touch /tmp/x...

8.8CVSS0.00427EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/10/13 7:18 p.m.•4 views

CVE-2026-110205

Roo Code through 3.54.0 contains a command approval bypass vulnerability in parseCommandLine that discards command substitutions placed next to or ? glob characters. Attackers using indirect prompt injection can craft commands like echo $... that match allowlisted prefixes, executing denied...

8.8CVSS0.00427EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/10/13 7:18 p.m.•5 views

CVE-2026-110203

Roo Code through 3.54.0 contains a command approval bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to auto-approve denied shell commands by abusing quote-masking regex in parseCommandLine. Attackers can use indirect prompt injection with escaped or single-quoted double quotes to hide command separato...

8.8CVSS0.00427EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/10/13 7:18 p.m.•3 views

CVE-2026-110204

Roo Code through 3.54.0 contains a command approval bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to run denied shell commands because parseCommandLine treats $ command; substitutions as parameter expansions. Attackers using indirect prompt injection can embed denied commands inside an allowlisted...

8.8CVSS0.00489EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/10/13 7:18 p.m.•5 views

CVE-2026-110202

Roo Code through 3.54.0 contains a command approval bypass vulnerability in getCommandDecision that allows attackers to auto-approve denied shell commands by prefixing them with a bare & redirect. Attackers using indirect prompt injection can make the allowlist match a redirect target like echo...

8.8CVSS0.00316EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/10/13 6:49 p.m.•7 views

CVE-2026-110204

Roo Code versions through 3.54.0 are vulnerable to a command approval bypass due to how the parseCommandLine() function handles ${ command; } substitutions as parameter expansions. Attackers can utilize indirect prompt injection to embed unauthorized shell commands within allowlisted commands, su...

8.8CVSS6.2AI score0.00489EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/10/13 6:49 p.m.•21 views

CVE-2026-110203 Roo-Code through 3.54.0 Auto-Approve Bypass via Quote Masking Desynchronization

Roo Code through 3.54.0 contains a command approval bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to auto-approve denied shell commands by abusing quote-masking regex in parseCommandLine. Attackers can use indirect prompt injection with escaped or single-quoted double quotes to hide command separato...

8.8CVSS0.00427EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/10/13 6:49 p.m.•11 views

CVE-2026-110203

Roo-Code versions through 3.54.0 are vulnerable to a command approval bypass caused by a quote-masking regex flaw in the parseCommandLine() function. Attackers can utilize indirect prompt injection with escaped or single-quoted double quotes to conceal command separators behind allowlisted prefix...

8.8CVSS6AI score0.00427EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/10/13 6:49 p.m.•25 views

CVE-2026-110202 Roo-Code through 3.54.0 Auto-Approve Bypass via Redirect Operator Stripping

Roo Code through 3.54.0 contains a command approval bypass vulnerability in getCommandDecision that allows attackers to auto-approve denied shell commands by prefixing them with a bare & redirect. Attackers using indirect prompt injection can make the allowlist match a redirect target like echo...

8.8CVSS0.00316EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/10/13 6:49 p.m.•12 views

CVE-2026-110202

Roo-Code versions up to and including 3.54.0 are vulnerable to a command approval bypass in the getCommandDecision() function. The root cause is redirect operator stripping , where attackers can auto-approve denied shell commands by prefixing them with a bare >& redirect. By using indirect pro...

8.8CVSS5.9AI score0.00316EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Mend
Mend
•added 2026/10/12 8:18 p.m.•4 views

CVE-2026-66877

Workflow runs from first-time fork contributors are held for maintainer approval only by inserting the run's jobs in a blocked state. The component that transitions blocked jobs to waiting does not re-check whether the run still needs approval. A separate, legitimate run in the same repository th...

9.3CVSS5.7AI score
SaveExploits0References3
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/10/12 1:10 p.m.•10 views

CVE-2026-109173

The yshop-crm software (versions through 2.1.3 ) is susceptible to a missing authorization vulnerability. The flaw resides in the CrmInvoiceController check handler, which lacks the @PreAuthorize annotation and has its approver checks commented out. This allows any authenticated back-office user ...

5.3CVSS5.8AI score0.00213EPSS
SaveExploits0References5
Kitploit
Kitploit
•added 2026/10/08 2:11 p.m.•21 views

CVE-2026-6145

CVE-2026-6145 — User Registration & Membership for WordPress: Unauthenticated Admin Approval Bypass Proof-of-concept exploit for CVE-2026-6145 , a missing authorization vulnerability in the User Registration & Membership plugin for WordPress ≤ 5.1.5 that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass...

5.3CVSS6.1AI score0.00434EPSS
SaveExploits1
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/10/06 8:17 p.m.•9 views

CVE-2026-94205

Gitea Actions decided whether a fork pull request run needed approval based on the user who triggered the event rather than the pull request author. For pullrequest activity triggered by a maintainer during ordinary triage, such as adding a label, the run was created without requiring approval,...

9.8CVSS0.00355EPSS
SaveExploits1References4
Rows per page
Query Builder