1263 matches found
DEBIAN-CVE-2022-45198
Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data Data Amplification...
CVE-2022-45198
Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data Data Amplification...
PYSEC-2022-42979
Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data Data Amplification...
PYSEC-2022-42979
Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data Data Amplification...
Design/Logic Flaw
Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data Data Amplification...
UBUNTU-CVE-2022-45198
Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data Data Amplification...
CVE-2022-45198
Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data Data Amplification...
CVE-2022-45198
Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data Data Amplification...
CVE-2022-45198
CVE-2022-45198 affects Pillow up to version 9.2.0, where improper handling of highly compressed GIF data (Data Amplification) can cause abnormal resource usage. Public sources confirm Pillow prior to 9.2.0 is vulnerable; advisories reference upgrades to mitigate. Debian LTS notes Pillow updates (...
CVE-2022-45198
Pillow before 9.2.0 performs Improper Handling of Highly Compressed GIF Data Data Amplification...
Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS Reflected Amplification Denial-of-Service Vulnerability
A Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS URL filtering policy misconfiguration could allow a network-based attacker to conduct reflected and amplified TCP denial-of-service RDoS attacks...
CVE-2022-22455
IBM Security Verify Governance Identity Manager 10.0 virtual appliance component performs an operation at a privilege level that is higher than the minimum level required, which creates new weaknesses or amplifies the consequences of other weaknesses. IBM X-Force ID: 224989...
PAN-OS: Reflected Amplification Denial-of-Service (DoS) Vulnerability in URL Filtering
A PAN-OS URL filtering policy misconfiguration could allow a network-based attacker to conduct reflected and amplified TCP denial-of-service RDoS attacks. The DoS attack would appear to originate from a Palo Alto Networks PA-Series hardware, VM-Series virtual and CN-Series container firewall...
CVE-2022-2576
In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.7.2 and 3.0.0-3.5.0 a DTLS resumption handshake falls back to a DTLS full handshake on a parameter mismatch without using a HelloVerifyRequest. Especially, if used with certificate based cipher suites, that results in message amplification DDoS other peer...
CVE-2022-2576
In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.7.2 and 3.0.0-3.5.0 a DTLS resumption handshake falls back to a DTLS full handshake on a parameter mismatch without using a HelloVerifyRequest. Especially, if used with certificate based cipher suites, that results in message amplification DDoS other peer...
Design/Logic Flaw
In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.7.2 and 3.0.0-3.5.0 a DTLS resumption handshake falls back to a DTLS full handshake on a parameter mismatch without using a HelloVerifyRequest. Especially, if used with certificate based cipher suites, that results in message amplification DDoS other peer...
Mantis Botnet Behind the Largest HTTPS DDoS Attack Targeting Cloudflare Customers
The botnet behind the largest HTTPS distributed denial-of-service DDoS attack in June 2022 has been linked to a spate of attacks aimed at nearly 1,000 Cloudflare customers. Calling the powerful botnet Mantis, the web performance and security company attributed it to more than 3,000 HTTP DDoS...
Denial Of Service
Scandium is vulnerable to Denial of Serivice. The DTLS stack is not implemented correctly, leading to an amplification attack using resumption handshakes...
CVE-2021-4234
OpenVPN Access Server 2.10 and prior versions are susceptible to resending multiple packets in a response to a reset packet sent from the client which the client again does not respond to, resulting in a limited amplification attack...
CVE-2021-4234
OpenVPN Access Server 2.10 and prior versions are susceptible to resending multiple packets in a response to a reset packet sent from the client which the client again does not respond to, resulting in a limited amplification attack...