StandardPolicyERC1155.sol doesn't validate the order.amount properly.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact StandardPolicyERC1155.sol doesn't validate the order.amount properly. This contract is used to check a policy for matching orders of ERC1155 tokens. But it doesn't check the amount of ERC1155 token properly and traders might lose their funds unexpectedly...

Amount of ERC1155 tokens transferred is always 1.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When a user signs an order to buy multiple ERC1155 tokens the amount of tokens transferred is hardcoded to be 1. This means although they expected to get n number of tokens for the total price of X they only get 1 and pay the total amount of X ETH. Proof...

The execution of an order transfers 1 token regardless of Order.amount

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An order can be placed for an arbitrary amount, which is relevant for ERC1155. But when matched and executed only 1 token is transferred. This can lead to problems with accounting for the user, expecting a transfer of Order.amount tokens, potentially wit...

withheld_amt calculation is done after minting frxETHToken tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of concept The submit method in frxETHMinter.sol has the following code // Give the sender frxETH frxETHToken.mintermintrecipient, msg.value; // Track the amount of ETH that we are keeping uint256 withheldamt = 0; if withholdRatio != 0 withheldamt =...

recoverEther not updating currentWithheldETH breaks calculation of withheld amount for further deposits

Lines of code Vulnerability details The emergency exit function recoverEther allows the owner to retrieve the ETH in case an issue were to happen. The problem is that this function does not update currentWithheldETH. This means upon deposit starting again after the emergency recovery,...

Users cannot use mintWithSignature() function in most cases

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function sfrxETH.mintWithSignature allows users to approve and mint in one transaction. Users will provide input param shares and function will calculate what assets amount needed to be approved in case approveMax = false. uint256 amount = approveMax ?...

Overflow in _baseVestedAmount() prevents claims to be retrieved

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Rewards of high value will be unable to be withdrawn since claimableAmount will revert. Proof of Concept In line 176, if we assume there's a claim of a token with 18 decimals and a vesting of 1 year, which is a realistic vesting period that can be observ...

Missing sanity check

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Missing sanity check on linearVestAmount Proof of Concept 1. Visit here 2. You are missing the sanity check on user inputted linearVestAmount 3. You need add the check on zero amount --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountere...

Overflow in amount calculation can lead to users not being able to withdraw their funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The amounts of token are saved in uint112 variables. The baseVestedAmount, which calculates the amount of token that was vested for the user given a timestamp, contains the following line that calculates the relative amount using the time passed from the...

error in calculation of vested amount

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The function vestedAmount can return a wrong value of vested amount. Proof of Concept The function vestedAmount calculates the vested amount of a recipient at a given time,referenceTs. The problem is that if the referenceTs is in the past and the user ha...

Contract TribeRedeemer: User might not redeem with large amount

Lines of code Vulnerability details 2022-09-tribe Contract TribeRedeemer: User might not redeem with large amount tags: c4, 2022-09-tribe, medium Affected code Impact After many redemptions of contract TribeRedeemer, redeemBase will be reduced and might not be still large. Then users can not rede...

Rounding error for low decimal token

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some token has low decimal USDC has only 6, as a result, the rounding may introduce substantial error in stable pair calculation, causing wrong getAmountOut quote, at the end lead to fund loss in swap function. Malicious user can abuse the wrong quote to...

Multiple Withdrawal Attack Vector in TRSRY.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Multiple Withdrawal Attack Vector in TRSRY.sol Proof of Concept The TRSRY.sol has setApprovalFor method to set approval for specific withdrawer addresses. The function is as below; function setApprovalFor address withdrawer, ERC20 token, uint256 amount...

New Golang-based 'Agenda Ransomware' Can Be Customized For Each Victim

A new ransomware strain written in Golang dubbed "Agenda" has been spotted in the wild, targeting healthcare and education entities in Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and Thailand. "Agenda can reboot systems in safe mode, attempts to stop many server-specific processes and services, and ha...

The vault account amount can be the result of an overflow

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The downcast uint128amountToTransfer can result in an overflow, which would impact the totalAsset.amout local variable, resulting in an incorrect amount for the totalAsset.amount state variable. function withdrawFeesuint128 shares, address recipient...

Users will never receive their borrow amount after tx the collateral

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact You are not able to receive any borrowed amount after adding addCollateral Proof of Concept By invoking addCollateral you will transfer an amount of collateralAmount to the Pair But you will receive any borrowed amount Recommended Mitigation Steps Invoke...

Affiliates Manager < 2.9.14 - Admin+ Stored Cross-Site Scripting

The plugin does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users to perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfilteredhtml capability is disallowed. Put the following payload in the "Currency Symbol" settings of the plugin and save: " Other settings...

MIMOVaultActions Tokens with fee on transfer are not supported

Lines of code Vulnerability details MIMOVaultActions Tokens with fee on transfer are not supported Vulnerability details There are ERC20 tokens that charge fee for every transfer / transferFrom. MIMOVaultActions.soldepositAndBorrow assumes that the received amount is the same as the transfer...

If baseJoin's available balance is greater than callers' amount no underlying will be transferred.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If callers' amount is greater than baseJoin's available balance no underlying will be transferred but caller still gets liquidatorCut. This may also negatively impact the accounting since its updated under the assumption that the caller will transfer...

Malicious code in amount-normalizer (npm)

--- -= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=- Source: ghsa-malware d09735973491e8bc50b7327031ed78e899206756947f1e87796071689767917d Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be...