6700 matches found
CVE-2020-14145
The client side in OpenSSH 5.7 through 8.4 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts where no host key for the server has been cached by the client. NOTE: some reports...
CVE-2020-14145
The client side in OpenSSH 5.7 through 8.4 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts where no host key for the server has been cached by the client. NOTE: some reports...
CVE-2020-14145
The client side in OpenSSH 5.7 through 8.4 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts where no host key for the server has been cached by the client. NOTE: some reports...
CVE-2020-14145
The CVE-2020-14145 entry concerns the OpenSSH client, with versions 5.7–8.4 (and notes that 8.5/8.6 may also be affected) exhibiting an observable discrepancy in the algorithm negotiation that leads to information leakage. The impact is a potential man-in-the-middle attack during initial connecti...
CVE-2020-14145
The client side in OpenSSH 5.7 through 8.4 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts where no host key for the server has been cached by the client. NOTE: some reports...
CVE-2020-14145
The client side in OpenSSH 5.7 through 8.4 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts where no host key for the server has been cached by the client. NOTE: some reports...
CVE-2020-14002: Observable Discrepancy
PuTTY 0.68 through 0.73 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts where no host key for the server has been cached by the client...
PT-2020-13830 · Simon Tatham +1 · Putty +1
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: PuTTY versions 0.68 through 0.73 Description: The issue allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts where no host key for the server has been cached by the client, due to an Observable Discrepancy leading to an...
CVE-2020-14002
PuTTY versions 0.68–0.73 have an observable discrepancy during algorithm negotiation that can leak information and enable MITM targeting the initial connection when no host key is cached. This is documented across multiple sources (DEBIAN/Mageia/Fedora advisories and Nessus plugin references) wit...
CVE-2020-14002
PuTTY 0.68 through 0.73 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts where no host key for the server has been cached by the client...
CVE-2020-14145: Observable Discrepancy
The client side in OpenSSH 5.7 through 8.4 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts where no host key for the server has been cached by the client. NOTE: some reports...
CVE-2020-14002
PuTTY 0.68 through 0.73 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts where no host key for the server has been cached by the client...
Baselining PassGAN: Adventures in the rhubarb
Cracking is a complex topic full of misunderstandings, confusing terminology and weird people. This blog post is front-loaded with some terminology, some explanations, and maybe some apologies. Password cracking: This is fundamentally one thing: guessing. Were not reversing, or talking to spirits...
Huawei Data Communication: Weak Algorithm Vulnerability in Some Huawei Products (huawei-sa-20200108-01-rsa)
There is a weak algorithm vulnerability in some Huawei products. Copyright C 2020 Greenbone Networks GmbH Some text descriptions might be excerpted from a referenced sources, and are Copyright C by the respective right holders. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later This program is free...
CVE-2020-15025
ntpd in ntp 4.2.8 before 4.2.8p15 and 4.3.x before 4.3.101 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service memory consumption by sending packets, because memory is not freed in situations where a CMAC key is used and associated with a CMAC algorithm in the ntp.keys file...
Design/Logic Flaw
ntpd in ntp 4.2.8 before 4.2.8p15 and 4.3.x before 4.3.101 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service memory consumption by sending packets, because memory is not freed in situations where a CMAC key is used and associated with a CMAC algorithm in the ntp.keys file...
CVE-2020-15025
The CVE-2020-15025 entry concerns ntpd (NTP) memory exhaustion via CMAC-related paths. Affected: ntpd 4.2.8 prior to 4.2.8p15 and 4.3.x prior to 4.3.101. Root cause: memory is not freed in CMAC-key scenarios in ntp.keys, enabling remote packets to trigger a denial of service through memory consum...
CVE-2020-15025: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime
ntpd in ntp 4.2.8 before 4.2.8p15 and 4.3.x before 4.3.101 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service memory consumption by sending packets, because memory is not freed in situations where a CMAC key is used and associated with a CMAC algorithm in the ntp.keys file...
PT-2020-2998
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions ntp versions 4.2.8 through 4.2.8p14 ntp versions 4.3.x through 4.3.100 Description The issue is related to a memory consumption problem in ntpd, which can be exploited by remote attackers to cause a denial of service. This occurs when memory i...
DDoS Protection for Networks: Utilizing AS Prepending to Route Traffic Through Imperva
In order for Imperva to protect customers’ traffic using DDoS Protection for Networks, the Internet must select Imperva as the best path. So what does this mean? Does Imperva automatically take over the customer’s prefix and control the routing of the Internet? Well…not exactly. Internet Routing...