CVE-2018-14343

In Wireshark 2.6.0 to 2.6.1, 2.4.0 to 2.4.7, and 2.2.0 to 2.2.15, the ASN.1 BER dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-ber.c by ensuring that length values do not exceed the maximum signed integer...

Integer overflow

In Wireshark 2.6.0 to 2.6.1, 2.4.0 to 2.4.7, and 2.2.0 to 2.2.15, the ASN.1 BER dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-ber.c by ensuring that length values do not exceed the maximum signed integer...

CVE-2018-14343

In Wireshark 2.6.0 to 2.6.1, 2.4.0 to 2.4.7, and 2.2.0 to 2.2.15, the ASN.1 BER dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-ber.c by ensuring that length values do not exceed the maximum signed integer...

CVE-2018-14343

CVE-2018-14343 affects Wireshark’s ASN.1 BER dissector across multiple versions (2.6.0–2.6.1, 2.4.0–2.4.7, 2.2.0–2.2.15). The issue is a crash caused by length values exceeding the maximum signed integer in the BER dissector. The published fix adjusts bounds in epan/dissectors/packet-ber.c to pre...

CVE-2018-14343

In Wireshark 2.6.0 to 2.6.1, 2.4.0 to 2.4.7, and 2.2.0 to 2.2.15, the ASN.1 BER dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-ber.c by ensuring that length values do not exceed the maximum signed integer...

CVE-2018-14343

In Wireshark 2.6.0 to 2.6.1, 2.4.0 to 2.4.7, and 2.2.0 to 2.2.15, the ASN.1 BER dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-ber.c by ensuring that length values do not exceed the maximum signed integer...

CVE-2016-2108

The ASN.1 implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1o and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2c allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service buffer underflow and memory corruption via an ANY field in crafted serialized data, aka the "negative zero" issue...

Security Bulletin: Multiple vulnerabilities in strongswan affect IBM Flex System Manager (FSM) (CVE-2017-9023, CVE-2017-9022)

Summary Multiple vulnerabilities have been identified in strongswan that is embedded in the FSM. This bulletin addresses these vulnerabilities. Vulnerability Details CVEID: CVE-2017-9023 DESCRIPTION: strongSwan is vulnerable to a denial of service, caused by the improper handling of CHOICE types ...

Security Bulletin: Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL affect Rational Reporting for Development Intelligence (CVE-2015-0286, CVE-2015-0287, CVE-2015-0288, CVE-2015-0289, CVE-2015-0293)

Summary OpenSSL vulnerabilities were disclosed on March 19, 2015 by the OpenSSL Project. OpenSSL is used by Rational Reporting for Development Intelligence RRDI. RRDI has addressed the applicable CVEs. Vulnerability Details CVEID: CVE-2015-0286 DESCRIPTION: OpenSSL is vulnerable to a denial of...

Security Bulletin: Vulnerabilities in OpenSSL affect IBM Cognos Metrics Manager (CVE-2015-0286, CVE-2015-0287, CVE-2015-0288, CVE-2015-0289, CVE-2015-0293)

Summary OpenSSL vulnerabilities were disclosed on March 19, 2015 by the OpenSSL Project. OpenSSL is used by IBM Cognos Metrics Manager. IBM Cognos Metrics Manager has addressed the applicable CVEs. Vulnerability Details CVEID: CVE-2015-0286 DESCRIPTION: OpenSSL is vulnerable to a denial of servic...

Security update for bouncycastle (moderate)

This update for bouncycastle to version 1.59 fixes the following issues: These security issues were fixed: - CVE-2017-13098: BouncyCastle, when configured to use the JCE Java Cryptography Extension for cryptographic functions, provided a weak Bleichenbacher oracle when any TLS cipher suite using...

CVE-2016-1000342

In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier ECDSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of...

Design/Logic Flaw

In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier ECDSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of...

CVE-2016-1000342

In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier ECDSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of...

CVE-2016-1000342

In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier ECDSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of...

CVE-2016-1000342

In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier ECDSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of...

CVE-2016-1000342

In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier ECDSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of...

CVE-2016-1000342

CVE-2016-1000342 is associated with Bouncy Castle JCE Provider up to version 1.55 and earlier, where ECDSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signatures during verification. This can allow injection of extra elements in the signature sequence and may permit the introduction of “invisible” ...

CVE-2016-1000342

In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier ECDSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of...

CVE-2016-1000338

In Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of...