1236 matches found
Privilege escalation
A local privilege escalation issue was found with the APM Java agent, where a user on the system could attach a malicious plugin to an application running the APM Java agent. By using this vulnerability, an attacker could execute code at a potentially higher level of permissions than their user...
CVE-2021-37942 APM Java Agent Local Privilege Escalation
A local privilege escalation issue was found with the APM Java agent, where a user on the system could attach a malicious plugin to an application running the APM Java agent. By using this vulnerability, an attacker could execute code at a potentially higher level of permissions than their user...
CVE-2021-37942
CVE-2021-37942 describes a local privilege escalation in the Elastic APM Java agent. A system user can attach a malicious plugin to an application running the APM Java agent, enabling code execution at a higher privilege level. Affected component: Elastic APM Java agent (Java). Root cause: abilit...
CVE-2021-22143 Elastic APM .NET Agent information disclosure
The Elastic APM .NET Agent can leak sensitive HTTP header information when logging the details during an application error. Normally, the APM agent will sanitize sensitive HTTP header details before sending the information to the APM server. During an application error it is possible the headers...
CVE-2021-22143
CVE-2021-22143 affects the Elastic APM .NET Agent, where sensitive HTTP header information can be leaked when logging errors because headers may not be sanitized before being sent to the APM server. This vulnerability concerns the Elastic APM .NET Agent components involved in error logging and he...
CVE-2021-22143 Elastic APM .NET Agent information disclosure
The Elastic APM .NET Agent can leak sensitive HTTP header information when logging the details during an application error. Normally, the APM agent will sanitize sensitive HTTP header details before sending the information to the APM server. During an application error it is possible the headers...
PT-2023-12332 · Unknown · Apm Java Agent
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: APM Java agent affected versions not specified Description: A local privilege escalation issue was found with the APM Java agent, where a user on the system could attach a malicious plugin to an application running the APM Java agent. By usin...
PT-2023-12039 · Elastic · Apm .Net Agent
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Elastic APM .NET Agent affected versions not specified Description: The issue concerns the Elastic APM .NET Agent leaking sensitive HTTP header information when logging application error details. Normally, the agent sanitizes sensitive HTTP...
F5 Networks BIG-IP : BIG-IP APM webtop vulnerability (K74114570)
The version of F5 Networks BIG-IP installed on the remote host is prior to tested version. It is, therefore, affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the K74114570 advisory. - A cross-site request forgery CSRF vulnerability in the APM webtop 11.2.1 or greater may allow attacker to force an AP...
CVE-2023-31416
Secret token configuration is never applied when using ECK =8.0. This could lead to anonymous requests to an APM Server being accepted and the data ingested into this APM deployment...
CVE-2023-31416
Secret token configuration is never applied when using ECK =8.0. This could lead to anonymous requests to an APM Server being accepted and the data ingested into this APM deployment...
Code injection
Secret token configuration is never applied when using ECK =8.0. This could lead to anonymous requests to an APM Server being accepted and the data ingested into this APM deployment...
CVE-2023-31416
The CVE-2023-31416 issue affects Elastic Cloud on Kubernetes (ECK) before 2.8 when used with APM Server 8.0 or later. The root cause is that the secret token configuration is not applied, which could allow anonymous requests to be accepted and lead to data ingestion into the APM deployment. Affec...
CVE-2023-31416 Elastic Cloud on Kubernetes (ECK) secret token configuration issue
Secret token configuration is never applied when using ECK =8.0. This could lead to anonymous requests to an APM Server being accepted and the data ingested into this APM deployment...
CVE-2023-31416 Elastic Cloud on Kubernetes (ECK) secret token configuration issue
Secret token configuration is never applied when using ECK =8.0. This could lead to anonymous requests to an APM Server being accepted and the data ingested into this APM deployment...
CVE-2023-31421
It was discovered that when acting as TLS clients, Beats, Elastic Agent, APM Server, and Fleet Server did not verify whether the server certificate is valid for the target IP address; however, certificate signature validation is still performed. More specifically, when the client is configured to...
Code injection
It was discovered that when acting as TLS clients, Beats, Elastic Agent, APM Server, and Fleet Server did not verify whether the server certificate is valid for the target IP address; however, certificate signature validation is still performed. More specifically, when the client is configured to...
CVE-2023-31421
CVE-2023-31421 affects Beats, Elastic Agent, APM Server, and Fleet Server when acting as TLS clients: if configured to connect to an IP address, the client does not validate the server certificate’s IP SAN against that IP, though certificate signature validation runs. This can allow a connection ...
CVE-2023-31421 Beats, Elastic Agent, APM Server, and Fleet Server Improper Certificate Validation issue
It was discovered that when acting as TLS clients, Beats, Elastic Agent, APM Server, and Fleet Server did not verify whether the server certificate is valid for the target IP address; however, certificate signature validation is still performed. More specifically, when the client is configured to...
Elasticsearch Security Vulnerabilities
Elasticsearch is a search engine based on the Lucene library. A security vulnerability exists in Elasticsearch that stems from the fact that Beats, Elastic Agent, APM Server, Fleet Server, when used as a TLS client, does not verify that the server certificate is valid for the target IP address...