176 matches found
CVE-2023-22600
Summary (CVE-2023-22600) InHand Networks InRouter 302 (pre-IR302 V3.5.56) and InRouter 615 (pre-InRouter6XX-S-V2.3.0.r5542) are affected by CWE-284: Improper Access Control. An unauthenticated device on the same network can subscribe to MQTT topics on the device manager network, and an attacker w...
CVE-2023-22600
InHand Networks InRouter 302, prior to version IR302 V3.5.56, and InRouter 615, prior to version InRouter6XX-S-V2.3.0.r5542, contain vulnerability CWE-284: Improper Access Control. They allow unauthenticated devices to subscribe to MQTT topics on the same network as the device manager. An...
CVE-2023-22599
InRouter 302 (all versions prior to IR302 V3.5.56) and InRouter 615 (all versions prior to InRouter6XX-S-V2.3.0.r5542) are affected by CWE-760: Use of a One-way Hash with a Predictable Salt. The MQTT credentials are encoded using a hardcoded string in an MD5 hash, which an unauthenticated attacke...
CVE-2023-22599
InHand Networks InRouter 302, prior to version IR302 V3.5.56, and InRouter 615, prior to version InRouter6XX-S-V2.3.0.r5542, contain vulnerability CWE-760: Use of a One-way Hash with a Predictable Salt. They send MQTT credentials in response to HTTP/HTTPS requests from the cloud platform. These...
CVE-2023-22597
InHand Networks InRouter 302, prior to version IR302 V3.5.56, and InRouter 615, prior to version InRouter6XX-S-V2.3.0.r5542, contain vulnerability CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information. They use an unsecured channel to communicate with the cloud platform by default. An...
CVE-2023-22597
InHand Networks InRouter302 (pre-IR302 v3.5.56) and InRouter615 (pre-InRouter6XX-S-V2.3.0.r5542) are affected by CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information. The devices communicate with the cloud over an unsecured channel by default, allowing an attacker to intercept configuration d...
PT-2023-1283 · Inhand Networks · Inrouter 615 +1
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: InHand Networks InRouter 302 versions prior to IR302 V3.5.56 InHand Networks InRouter 615 versions prior to InRouter6XX-S-V2.3.0.r5542 Description: The issue is related to improper access control in the software of InHand Networks InRouter 30...
PT-2023-2790 · Inhand Networks · Inrouter 615 +1
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: InHand Networks InRouter 302 versions prior to IR302 V3.5.56 InHand Networks InRouter 615 versions prior to InRouter6XX-S-V2.3.0.r5542 Description: The issue is related to the use of insufficiently random values, specifically with the MQTT...
PT-2023-1075 · Inhand Networks · Inrouter 615 +1
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: InHand Networks InRouter 302 versions prior to IR302 V3.5.56 InHand Networks InRouter 615 versions prior to InRouter6XX-S-V2.3.0.r5542 Description: The issue is related to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command, whi...
PT-2023-1274 · Inhand Networks · Inrouter302 +1
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: InHand Networks InRouter 302 versions prior to IR302 V3.5.56 InHand Networks InRouter 615 versions prior to InRouter6XX-S-V2.3.0.r5542 Description: The issue is related to the use of a one-way hash with a predictable salt, allowing an...
PT-2023-1275 · Inhand Networks · Inrouter302 +1
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: InHand Networks InRouter 302 versions prior to IR302 V3.5.56 InHand Networks InRouter 615 versions prior to InRouter6XX-S-V2.3.0.r5542 Description: The issue is related to the use of an unsecured channel for data transmission by default, whic...
CVE-2022-35843
CVE-2022-35843 affects FortiOS SSH login component (and FortiProxy SSH) across multiple versions, allowing remote, unauthenticated login via a crafted Access-Challenge response from RADIUS. Affected: FortiOS 6.0–7.2.0 and 6.2–6.4.9; FortiProxy 1.2.0–2.0.10 and 7.0.0–7.0.5. Root cause described as...
DEBIAN-CVE-2022-45061
An issue was discovered in Python before 3.11.1. An unnecessary quadratic algorithm exists in one path when processing some inputs to the IDNA RFC 3490 decoder, such that a crafted, unreasonably long name being presented to the decoder could lead to a CPU denial of service. Hostnames are often...
CVE-2022-40703
CWE-302 Authentication Bypass by Assumed-Immutable Data in AliveCor Kardia App version 5.17.1-754993421 and prior on Android allows an unauthenticated attacker with physical access to the Android device containing the app to bypass application authentication and alter information in the app...
Authentication flaw
CWE-302 Authentication Bypass by Assumed-Immutable Data in AliveCor Kardia App version 5.17.1-754993421 and prior on Android allows an unauthenticated attacker with physical access to the Android device containing the app to bypass application authentication and alter information in the app...
CVE-2022-40703
CWE-302 Authentication Bypass by Assumed-Immutable Data in AliveCor Kardia App version 5.17.1-754993421 and prior on Android allows an unauthenticated attacker with physical access to the Android device containing the app to bypass application authentication and alter information in the app...
Server side request forgery (ssrf)
The url parameter of the /api/geojson endpoint in Metabase versions 44.5 can be used to perform Server Side Request Forgery attacks. Previously implemented blacklists could be circumvented by leveraging 301 and 302 redirects...
CVE-2022-43776
The url parameter of the /api/geojson endpoint in Metabase versions 44.5 can be used to perform Server Side Request Forgery attacks. Previously implemented blacklists could be circumvented by leveraging 301 and 302 redirects...
U.S. Dept Of Defense: Account takeover on ███████ [HtUS]
Hello, I have found an endpoint in ████████ is vulnerable to Account takeover Steps to reproduce: 1. Create 2 accounts Attacker A and vicitm B 2. Log in to all of them and go to https://███████/███████/EditUserProfile with attacker's account 3. Now fill out the password with your password 4. Chan...
Server-Side Request Forgery
Dompdf is vulnerable to Information disclosure. The vulnerability exists when reading files using filegetcontents over http. If theres 302 response, it will allow a redirect to a blacklisted site...