CVE-2018-13495

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for KMCToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13543

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GemstoneToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13687

CVE-2018-13687 describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of a smart contract for the normikaivo Ethereum token. The overflow enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. The provided documents confirm the vulnerability details but do not include explic...

CVE-2018-13599

CVE-2018-13599 affects the ResidualValue Ethereum token: the mintToken function in its smart contract has an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the root cause described across sources (NVD entry and related records). The avail...

CVE-2018-13544

The CVE-2018-13544 entry concerns a mintToken integer overflow in Numisma’s Ethereum token smart contract. The vulnerability allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, indicating a storage/balance manipulation vulnerability in the token mintToken function. The affe...

CVE-2018-13657

CVE-2018-13657 concerns the Rice Ethereum token. The mintToken function in its smart contract has an integer overflow vulnerability that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value, enabling unauthorized balance manipulation. No remediation details are provided in the con...

CVE-2018-13507

The CVE concerns the mintToken function in the SLCAdvancedToken smart contract. A integer overflow vulnerability allows the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance to a chosen value. The affected component is the mintToken implementation within the Ethereum token contract, with the u...

CVE-2018-13678

CVE-2018-13678 concerns a vulnerability in the Lottery Ethereum token contract. The mintToken function has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The root cause and impact are described in the sources; however, the connected documents d...

CVE-2018-13772

The CVE-2018-13772 entry covers a vulnerability in TheFlashToken’s smart contract where the mintToken function suffers an integer overflow. This allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Documents consistently identify the affected component as the mintToken funct...

CVE-2018-13694

CVE-2018-13694 concerns the GMile Ethereum token smart contract. The issue is in the contract’s mintToken function, where an integer overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This constitutes a critical integrity risk for token balances and could comprom...

CVE-2018-13684

CVE-2018-13684 concerns the ZIP Ethereum token. The mintedToken function contains an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the stated root cause and impacts balance integrity (ownership control over balances). Exploitation details...

CVE-2018-13697

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for RobotBTC, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13543

The CVE-2018-13543 entry concerns GemstoneToken, an Ethereum token implemented as a smart contract. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the stated vulnerability and impact. The provided connec...

CVE-2018-13464

The CVE-2018-13464 entry concerns t_swap, an Ethereum-based token smart contract. The issue is an integer overflow in the mintToken function that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is documented across multiple sources (e.g., CNVD-2018-13030, NVD entry...

CVE-2018-13557

The CVE-2018-13557 issue concerns a smart contract for Trabet_Coin where the mintToken function has an integer overflow . This vulnerability could allow the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value, representing an impact on balance integrity. The root cause is an overf...

CVE-2018-13715

The CVE-2018-13715 issue affects a smart contract implementation of BpsToken (Ethereum token). The mintToken function reportedly contains an integer overflow, enabling the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This is the primary vulnerability and impact described in the...

CVE-2018-13523

Summary: CVE-2018-13523 concerns an integer overflow in the mintToken function of the SmartPayment Ethereum token smart contract. The overflow enables the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. The description appears consistently across multiple sources (NVD/CNVD/CVEs) a...

CVE-2018-13623

CVE-2018-13623 affects the mintToken function of the AirdropperCryptics Ethereum token smart contract. Root cause: integer overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value, yielding owner-controlled balances and potential financial impact. CVSS data in the sourc...

CVE-2018-13778

The CVE-2018-13778 entry concerns CGCToken’s mintToken function, where an integer overflow allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The available documents describe the vulnerability as an integer overflow but do not provide concrete remediation steps, affected v...

CVE-2018-13759

CVE-2018-13759 concerns the mintToken function of the BIGCAdvancedToken Ethereum smart contract. The vulnerability is an integer overflow in mintToken, which the report states allows the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to any value. This root cause enables potential balanc...